Big Ideas Simply Explained - The Sociology Book

["THE ROLE INSTITUT","OF IONS","252 INTRODUCTION Karl Marx says religion Max Weber explains Antonio Gramsci uses the In Asylums, Erving is \u201cthe sigh of the the process of term \u201chegemony\u201d to Goffman describes oppressed creature... the secularization and explain how the views of how \u201ctotal opium of the people\u201d in his rationalization of the dominant class institutions\u201d essay \u201cA Contribution to modern society in The reorder people\u2019s Protestant Ethic and become seen by the rest personalities and the Critique of Hegel\u2019s the Spirit of Capitalism. of society as \u201ccommon Philosophy of Right.\u201d sense\u201d and indisputable. identities. 1844 1904\u201305 1930S 1961 1897 1911 1949 1963 In Suicide, \u00c9mile Durkheim In Political Parties, In Social Theory and In Outsiders, Howard introduces the idea of Robert Michels argues Social Structure, Robert S. Becker suggests K. Merton proposes that that any behavior \u201canomie\u201d to account for that bureaucracies can be considered differing suicide rates, render democratic \u201canomie\u201d is at the deviant if society root of deviant labels it as such. revealing this personal act government behavior. as a social phenomenon. impossible to achieve. F or centuries, the dominant Enlightenment and the economic and so on. The new institutions institutions in Europe were demands of industry. The social formed a prominent part of the the Church and the ruling cohesion based on community social structure of modern society, class of monarchs and aristocrats. values and shared beliefs gave and sociologists have sought It was not until the Renaissance way to new secular institutions, to identify the roles they play that the authority of the Church and government of society was in creating and maintaining was challenged by humanist ideas transferred to representatives social order. and scienti\ufb01c discovery, and of the people. Together with republican democracy began to this secularization came a Bureaucracies, however, are threaten claims of a God-given, rationalization suited to the organized for ef\ufb01ciency and inherited right to rule. The age increasingly material nature of consequently tend to follow a of Enlightenment thought further modern society. Industrialization, hierarchical structure. As Robert weakened these institutions, and and the capitalism that grew from Michels pointed out, this leads to in the 18th century the old order it, required a much greater degree their being ruled by a small elite, an was overturned with political of administration, and the idea of oligarchy, which, far from helping to revolutions in the US and France, bureaucracy spread from the sphere promote democratic government, and an Industrial Revolution of commerce to government too. actively prevents it. As a result, spreading from Britain. people feel as much under the The institutions of modern control of the new institutions Secularism and rationalism society evolved from these as they did under religious and A recognizably modern society bureaucracies: \ufb01nancial and monarchical rule. Michel Foucault rapidly emerged, which was business institutions, government later examined the nature of shaped by the rational ideas of the departments, hospitals, education, the (often unnoticed) power of the media, the police, armed forces, institutions to shape society and","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 253 Bryan Wilson Stanley Cohen\u2019s Folk Ivan Illich, Paul Willis\u2019s discusses the Devils and Moral in Medical Nemesis: Learning to Labor diminishing social role of religion Panics is inspired by The Expropriation describes how media coverage of of Health, claims that the education in Religion medical establishment in Secular Society. violent clashes reproduces and between mods and constitutes a \u201cmajor perpetuates class threat to health.\u201d rockers in 1964. distinctions. 1966 1972 1975 1977 1970\u201384 1973 1976 1988 Michel Foucault J\u00fcrgen Habermas\u2019s In Schooling in Capitalist In The Time of Tribes, discusses how Legitimation Crisis explains America, Samuel Bowles Michel Maffesoli says governments use how institutions can lose the and Herbert Gintis say that individualism is policies to shape education instills attitudes declining as people citizens and right to exercise social control if they do not have and dispositions via a try to create new society. the con\ufb01dence of the people. \u201chidden curriculum.\u201d social groupings. the behavior of its individual population still identify themselves example of this is our increasing citizens\u2014imposing social norms, as belonging to a recognized reliance on medicine as a means of and sti\ufb02ing individuality. J\u00fcrgen faith community, and in many curing all ills, as described by Ivan Habermas was similarly critical of places religion is increasingly Illich. Education, too, came under institutional power, but argued that becoming a social force. scrutiny as an institutional means this can only be wielded so long of fostering social attitudes and as the institutions are trusted by Individualism and society maintaining a desired social order. the people. More recently (and As well as studying the nature and controversially), Michel Maffesoli scope of institutions in society, But it was \u00c9mile Durkheim who has suggested that as people sociologists in the latter part of the recognized the con\ufb02ict between become disillusioned with 20th century have taken a more individualism and institutional institutions, they form new social interpretive approach, examining expectations of conformity. His groupings along tribal lines, with the effects of these institutions on concept of \u201canomie,\u201d a mismatch corresponding new institutions. the individual members of society. between an individual\u2019s beliefs and Max Weber had warned of the desires and those of society, was The social in\ufb02uence of religious stultifying effects of bureaucracy, taken up by Robert K. Merton in his institutions, described famously trapping people in the \u201ciron cage\u201d explanation of what was considered by Karl Marx as \u201cthe opium of the of rationalization, and later Erving deviant behavior. Howard S. Becker people,\u201d declined with the growth Goffman described the effects developed this further, suggesting of bureaucracies, and during the of institutionalization, when that any behavior could be 20th century most states had (at individuals have become so used to considered deviant if an institution least nominally) a form of secular living with an institution they can labels it as such, and, according to government. Nevertheless, today no longer do without it. A particular Stanley Cohen, the modern media some 75 percent of the world\u2019s demonizes things in just this way. \u25a0","RELIGION IS THE SIGH OF THE OPPRESSED CREATURE KARL MARX (1818\u20131883)","","256 KARL MARX Economic hardship prevents most people IN CONTEXT from achieving comfort and true happiness in FOCUS Religion this world. KEY DATES Religion distorts Religion provides 1807 German philosopher this reality and encourages false hopes and says Georg Hegel\u2019s work The people to work hard, passively that true happiness can Phenomenology of Spirit only be attained in the introduces the concept accept their lot, and of alienation. endure suffering. heavenly afterlife. 1841 The Essence of Although it provides solace, Christianity by German religion is the sigh of the philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach draws on Hegel\u2019s idea of oppressed creature, the heart alienation and applies it of a heartless world. critically to Christianity. 1966 Religion has lost its authority, according to British sociologist Bryan Wilson in Religion in Secular Society. 2010 German sociologist J\u00fcrgen Habermas, in An Awareness of What is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post- Secular Age, muses on why religion has failed to disappear. A ccording to the German opposite), the social structures qualities, so they unconsciously philosopher Georg Hegel, and institutions that people worship themselves. This prevents liberty in a full sense create to serve them can instead them from fully realizing their own consists of participation in certain come to control and even enslave potential; the divine is no more ethical institutions. More infamously, them. The process of rational self- than a projection of alienated he also said that only in the state discovery can lead to \u201calienation\u201d\u2014 human consciousness. Karl Marx\u2019s \u201cdoes man have rational existence.\u201d a concept of estrangement that went collaborator, Friedrich Engels, He believed that Christianity was on to have a profound in\ufb02uence on acknowledged that Feuerbach\u2019s the perfect (\u201cconsummate\u201d) religion the social sciences. The Essence of Christianity had for the emerging age of modernity a profoundly liberating effect on because it re\ufb02ected its spirit or Ludwig Feuerbach, a German them both in the 1840s. geist\u2014faith in reason and truth. philosopher and former student However, because of the process of of Hegel\u2019s, used the concept of Man makes religion contradiction known as \u201cdialectic\u201d alienation to criticize religion. Karl Marx\u2019s father had converted (in which, by its own nature, Feuerbach argues that people from Judaism to Christianity something can contain its endow God with human qualities merely to ensure his job security, and then worship him for those","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 257 See also: Auguste Comte 22\u201325 \u25a0 Karl Marx 28\u201331 \u25a0 Friedrich Engels 66\u201367 \u25a0 Sylvia Walby 96\u201399 \u25a0 Max Weber 220\u201323 \u25a0 Bryan Wilson 278\u201379 \u25a0 J\u00fcrgen Habermas 286\u201387 Religion is used by those in them, are not natural or inevitable that serves capitalist interests, temporal charge to invest but can be overthrown. Until then, including religion, has to be themselves with authority. religion will remain as a symptom contested, and ultimately done Christopher Hitchens of the disease caused by material away with. The replacement will deprivation and human alienation, be a humanist society based on British-US writer (1949\u20132011) which creates such pain for its socialism and communism. sufferers that they need the solace and yet he instilled in his son a provided by religion. According to Marx, religion belief that religion is necessary for is \u201cconsolation and justi\ufb01cation\u201d morality. However, from a relatively Like the French philosopher for the existing state and society. young age, Karl Marx criticized Auguste Comte, for whom religious Churches proclaim that the the idea that a spiritual realm was belief is an infantile state of reason, authority of the ruling class is needed to maintain social order. Marx believes in society progressing ordained by supernatural authority, He later became convinced that scienti\ufb01cally toward secularism. thus the lowly position of the secularization (decline in the social However, Marx is more critical of workers is inevitable and signi\ufb01cance of religion) will liberate religion as a re\ufb02ection of society, just. When a society is riven by people from mystical forms of social rather than as a set of beliefs. inequality, injustice is perpetuated oppression. He outlined many His goal is to liberate the working rather than eased. Marx declared: of his ideas about religion in class from the oppression of \u201cThe struggle against religion is, \u201cA Contribution to the Critique of capitalism, and he argues that the therefore, indirectly the struggle Hegel\u2019s Philosophy of Right\u201d (1844). ideas of the ruling class are those against that world whose spiritual dominating society\u2014and one of aroma is religion.\u201d This sentiment Expanding upon the idea of the apparatuses transmitting was echoed in the 1960s by British alienation, Marx argues that \u201cman those ideas is the Church. sociologist Bryan Wilson, who makes religion, religion does not claims that the role of the Church make man.\u201d People, he says, have The Church and the state is to socialize each new generation forgotten that they invented God, In 18th-century England, an into accepting their lot. who has come to have a life of his unknown wit described the Church own and now controls the people. of England as a political party \u201cat Marx aims to expose the What people have created, they can prayer.\u201d For Marx, any institution illusory nature of religion and reveal destroy. The revolutionary working it as an ideological tool of the \u276f\u276f class, he believes, will realize that the ideologies and institutions of capitalist society, which enslave The wealth of the Catholic Church has been criticized by many. For Marx, religion serves capitalist interests and is a tool used by wealthy elites to control and oppress the working class.","258 KARL MARX Marx argues that religion is a belief The hereafter the people\u201d when the situation system that enables the ruling class demands their real happiness: to maintain power in the present by \u201cTo call on them to give up their promising the working class that things illusions about their condition is to will be better in the hereafter. The poor call on them to give up a condition \ufb01nd solace in moral teachings because, that requires illusions.\u201d The task of ultimately, they will reap a reward for history and philosophy, he declares, their suffering; social change is averted is \u201cto unmask self-estrangement in because religion stabilizes society and its unholy forms once the holy form upholds the status quo. of human self-estrangement has been unmasked.\u201d The here and now Marx agreed with German ruling class. Because a belief in the which suggests that religion has a sociologist Max Weber\u2019s premise hereafter serves as a comfort to radical or potentially revolutionary that Protestantism had played a the poor and the oppressed, Marx aspect. In 17th-century England, big role in establishing capitalism described religion as \u201cthe opium of for example, Puritanism led because it better satis\ufb01ed the the people.\u201d Russian revolutionary to the execution of a king and commercial needs of 16th-century Vladimir Ilyich Lenin said it is the establishment of a republic. merchants and later industrialists. \u201cspiritual gin\u201d: religion deadens the However, Marx says that religion Hard work accompanied by reward harsh realities of working-class life, is the \u201cillusory happiness of was at the heart of Protestant and through it people are drugged philosophy, and Calvinists in into accepting their lowly positions Feminism and religion particular looked upon material in return for a better afterlife. In success as a sign of God\u2019s favor. effect, religion can be understood Elizabeth Cady Stanton, as a potent form of social control 19th-century US author of The Marx describes the Reformation that keeps the poor in their place Woman\u2019s Bible, said the Word as Germany\u2019s revolutionary past\u2014 and obstructs social change. of God was actually that of a a revolution that began in the brain man and was used to subjugate of a monk, as he puts it. Luther, Religion and radicalism women. Feminist theories he says, \u201covercame bondage out Marx does not overlook the fact that of religion since then have of devotion by replacing it with Christianity is a religion that grew generally echoed this theme of bondage out of conviction\u201d; Luther out of oppression, and that it has sexism and gender inequality. turned priests into laymen because sustained and comforted those he turned laymen into priests. In who are miserable and without Women tend to participate Marx\u2019s view, Protestantism did hope. Religious suffering is both more than men in religious an \u201cexpression of real suffering and observation, but they are usually writer Nawal El Saadawi a protest against real suffering\u201d\u2014 marginalized and discriminated says religion may be used to it is the \u201csigh\u201d of oppressed people, against, with fewer rights and oppress women, but the cause heavier punishments. Egyptian is patriarchal forms of society, which has reshaped religion. Many Muslim women use their religion and dress to symbolize their liberation, notes British sociologist Linda Woodhead. Within some religions, the position of women is changing signi\ufb01cantly; since the Church of England permitted female ordination in 1992, women now make up one in \ufb01ve of the clergy.","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 259 not offer the true solution to the The roots of modern religion in this way also thwarted their problem, but it did provide a \u201ctrue are deeply embedded in the revolutionary potential and ensured setting\u201d whereby a man\u2019s struggle they became the compliant was now no longer against the social oppression of the workhorses of industry. clergy outside but the \u201cpriestly working masses. nature\u201d inside himself. Western intellectuals such as Vladimir Ilyich Lenin A.C. Grayling, the late Christopher Meanwhile, the social status Hitchens, and Richard Dawkins, quo presented a further obstacle to Russian political theorist (1870\u20131924) sometimes branded the \u201cNew real human emancipation. Whereas Atheists,\u201d share many of Marx\u2019s the landowners and capitalists It also attracted the new factory sentiments about religion. Namely became richer in this world, the owners, who were both perturbed that, as arguably the \ufb01rst attempt reward for the working class for by the apparently irreligious nature at philosophy, religion is interesting toiling long hours for little pay was of their workers and shocked by but is a form of alienation, both a place in heaven; suffering is made their vices, such as drunkenness. emotional and intellectual, and into a virtue. Marx is concerned Offering Marxists further evidence a poor substitute for social justice by the role of the Church as a of religion being used as an and happiness. However, Marx landowner and employer in the 19th ideological tool by the ruling himself\u2014in his observations about century and sees this as further classes, some owners coerced the Reformation\u2014acknowledged evidence that religion is one more workers into attending services, religion\u2019s potential for radical ideological tool used by the ruling Bible study classes, educational thought and social action. The part classes to control the workers. talks, and hobbies in an attempt that Nonconformist religions played to \u201ceducate\u201d them into a \u201cdecent,\u201d in Britain during more than a An irreligious workforce sober, existence\u2014one that century of progressive social reform In Britain, the establishment feared would enable them to work more later demonstrated this. In seeking that working people were losing ef\ufb01ciently. Divesting them of energy an answer as to why religion has touch with organized religion and not faded away by the 21st century, turning instead to other Christian J\u00fcrgen Habermas acknowledges religious groups or working-class the important public role played political movements, such as by religious communities in many Chartism. For this reason, a Census parts of the world. Today, in spite of Religious Worship was carried of widespread secularization, no out in 1851. This revealed working- one speaks of the extinction of class apathy as well as a divide in religions or the religious. \u25a0 society between the conservative, established Church of England and the meeting houses and chapels where followers of newer, popular religions, such as Quakerism and Unitarianism, gathered. Methodism\u2014a Protestant denomination focused on helping the poor\u2014was extremely popular in many working-class areas in the manufacturing centers of Britain. Christian groups like the Quakers were perceived as a threat to the religious-political status quo. Opposed to war and slavery, and refusing to swear oaths to others, they rejected the idea of hierarchies in the Church.","260 THE IRON LAW OF OLIGARCHY ROBERT MICHELS (1876\u20131936) IN CONTEXT B ureaucracy is an enemy of Keeping their positions of power individual liberty, according becomes an important role of FOCUS to Robert Michels. In the bureaucracies such as political Oligarchy early 20th century, he pointed parties; and maintaining an air out the link between bureaucracy of mystery and superiority through KEY DATES and political oligarchy (the rule complex voting systems, use 1904\u201305 Max Weber\u2019s of the many by the few). In his of arcane language, and sub- The Protestant Ethic and the observations of political parties committees helps to ensure this. Spirit of Capitalism sees the and unions, he saw that the size Of\ufb01cials tend to be well-insulated rationalization that results and complexity of democracies from the consequences of their from bureaucracy as an require hierarchy. A leadership, decisions\u2014bureaucracy protects inevitable feature of modernity. with a clear chain of command, them against public accountability. and separate from the masses, is Oligarchy thrives in the hierarchical 1911 In Political Parties, needed\u2014resulting in a pyramid- structure of bureaucracy and German social and political like structure that places a few frequently undermines people\u2019s theorist Robert Michels leaders in charge of vast and control over their elected leaders. \u25a0 contends that organizational powerful organizations. democracy is an impossibility. Who says organization, Michels applies Max says oligarchy. 1916 Italian sociologist Weber\u2019s idea that a hierarchy of Vilfredo Pareto argues that responsibility increases ef\ufb01ciency, Robert Michels democracy is an illusion; the but argues that this concentrates elite will always serve itself. power and endangers democracy. The interests of the elites of 2009 The launch of the Chilcot organizations, rather than the Inquiry in the UK into the 2003 needs of the people, become invasion of Iraq shows the the key focus, despite professed extent to which of\ufb01cials, such democratic ideals. Michels stresses as ex-Prime Minister Tony that the self-interest of those at Blair, are protected from being the top of organizations always publicly accountable for their comes to the fore. actions. Many argue that Blair should be tried for war crimes. See also: Karl Marx 28\u201331 \u25a0 Max Weber 38\u201345 \u25a0 Friedrich Engels 66\u201367 \u25a0 Michel Foucault 270\u201377 \u25a0 J\u00fcrgen Habermas 286\u201387","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 261 HEALTHY PEOPLE NEED NO BUREAUCRACY TO MATE, GIVE BIRTH, AND DIE IVAN ILLICH (1926\u20132002) IN CONTEXT S ociety has become acutely Hospital births, uncommon before aware of the dangers posed the 20th century, are cited by some FOCUS by medicine. Over-use of as an example of social iatrogenesis\u2014 Iatrogenesis diagnostic x-rays in pregnancy, the increasing, and unncecessary, which can lead to childhood medicalization of life. KEY DATES cancers, and harmful prescription- c.460\u2013370 BCE Hippocrates, drug interactions are examples. depression is, for example, often a physician in ancient Greece, The Greek word \u201ciatrogenesis\u201d\u2014 treated with habit-forming drugs. believes medics should not \u201cbrought forth by a healer\u201d\u2014is used The agencies involved, such as cause harm to their patients; to describe such problems. Radical drug companies, have a vested iatrogenesis becomes a Austrian thinker Ivan Illich argues interest in treating people this way. punishable offence. that the medical establishment has become a serious threat to human Even worse, for Illich, is cultural 1847 Hungarian physician life because, in conjunction with iatrogenesis\u2014the destruction of Ignaz Semmelweis capitalism, it is an institution traditional ways of coping with recommends surgeons that serves itself and makes more illness, pain, and death. The over- wash their hands to reduce people sick than it heals. medicalization of our lives means infection-related deaths. that we have become increasingly Illich suggests there are three unwilling to face the realities of 1975 Ivan Illich, in Medical main types of iatrogenesis. Clinical death and disease: doctors have Nemesis, claims that the iatrogenesis is when a harm arises assumed the role of priests. \u25a0 medical establishment that would not have occured constitutes a major threat without medical intervention; to human health. less resistance to bacteria from the over-prescription of antibiotics, 2002 David Clark, professor of for example. Social iaotragenesis medical sociology, argues that is the medicalization of life: more terminal cancer patients are and more problems are seen as given ravaging chemotherapy amenable to medical intervention, treatments as a result of with expensive treatments being human-centered treatment developed for non-diseases. Minor that offers false hope. See also: George Ritzer 120\u201323 \u25a0 Robert Putnam 124\u201325 \u25a0 Ulrich Beck 156\u201361 \u25a0 Erving Goffman 264\u201369 \u25a0 Michel Foucault 270\u201377; 302\u201303","262 SOME COMMIT CRIMES BECAUSE THEY ARE RESPONDING TO A SOCIAL SITUATION ROBERT K. MERTON (1910\u20132003) IN CONTEXT Societies provide people with D eviance is universal, clear life goals. normal, and functional, FOCUS according to French Anomie or strain theory Not everyone has theorist \u00c9mile Durkheim. He the means to achieve argues that when people no longer KEY DATES feel integrated into society and 1897 In Suicide, \u00c9mile these goals. are unsure of its norms and rules\u2014 Durkheim uses the concept for example, during times of rapid of anomie to account for Pressure to conform social change\u2014they are more differing suicide rates among and \u201csucceed\u201d leads to likely to turn to deviant acts or Protestants and Catholics. suicide. This condition is known deviant acts. as anomie, a Greek word meaning 1955 US criminologist Albert \u201cwithout law.\u201d In his article \u201cSocial Cohen, a former student of Some commit Structure and Anomie,\u201d published Talcott Parsons, says the crimes because they in 1938, US sociologist Robert disadvantages faced by K. Merton adapts Durkheim\u2019s lower-class men cause status are responding to analysis of deviance, applying frustration, or strain, leading to a social situation. it to contemporary US society delinquency, which is seen as and arguing that such behavior a way to command respect. occurs as a direct result of strain. 1983 British criminologist The American Dream Steven Box says some Merton suggests that the ideals accounts of delinquency, such and aspirations connected with as those of Albert Cohen, fail individual \u201csuccess\u201d in the to explain the crimes of the US\u2014the \u201cAmerican Dream\u201d of, powerful in society. for example, material prosperity, and home and car ownership\u2014 1992 US sociologist Robert are socially produced. Not everyone Agnew insists that anomie, can achieve these goals through or strain theory, can be used legitimate means because certain to explain crime and deviancy constraints, such as social class, but should not be tied to class. act as barriers to achieving them. According to Merton, deviance","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 263 See also: Richard Sennett 84\u201387 \u25a0 Robert D. Putnam 124\u201325 \u25a0 Robert K. Merton Max Weber 220\u201323 \u25a0 Howard S. Becker 280\u201385 \u25a0 Talcott Parsons 300\u201301 The American Dream of leading a not aspire to society\u2019s cultural Robert K. Merton was born as charmed life, owning a home and a car, goals, but nevertheless respect the Meyer R. Schkolnick in 1910 in and accumulating wealth is a fantasy recognized means of achieving Philadelphia. His parents were for many, especially those caught in the them. They may, for example, go working-class Russian-Jewish clutches of poverty and unemployment. to work every day and perform their immigrants; the \ufb01rst few years duties conscientiously, but they do of his life were spent living (which is also socially constructed) not attempt to climb the corporate above their dairy shop (which is likely to occur when there is an ladder to \u201csuccess.\u201d later burned down). He obvious tension or discrepancy adopted the stage name between social expectations and \u201cInnovators\u201d (often seen as Robert Merlin at the age of 14 the ability or desire to attain them. criminals) are those who believe in as part of his magician act, but This \u201cstrain theory,\u201d for Merton, the goals of society but choose less changed it to Robert K. Merton explains the direct correlation legitimate and traditional means when he won a scholarship to between unemployment and crime: to achieve them. \u201dRetreatists\u201d are Temple University. for example, a lack of money means society\u2019s dropouts\u2014they reject not that the legal routes to buying a only conventional goals but also Merton is credited with car, a house, or other items are the traditional means of attaining coining the phrases \u201cself- not accessible, but the pressure to them. Finally, \u201cRebels\u201d are similar ful\ufb01lling prophecy\u201d and \u201crole conform to what is expected can to Retreatists, but they create models,\u201d and is said to have lead people to theft. alternative goals and means pioneered the focus-group of achieving them and seek to research method. He was Rebel or conformist? advance a counterculture. It is elected president of the Merton extends his theory by this group (which often includes American Sociological dividing people into \ufb01ve categories terrorists and revolutionaries) that, Association in 1957. according to their relationship according to Merton, can effect to culturally accepted goals and social change. Key works the means of achieving them. \u201cConformists,\u201d he suggests, have Merton\u2019s strain theory has been 1938 \u201cSocial Structure and invested in the American Dream criticized for focusing on individual Anomie\u201d and, through the accepted routes of deviancy at the expense of group 1949 Social Theory and Social education and gainful employment, or gang behavior. It is also argued Structure are able to attain it. \u201cRitualists\u201d do that the theory relies too heavily on 1985 On the Shoulder of of\ufb01cial crime statistics, which often Giants: A Shandean Postscript obscure middle-class crime. \u25a0 Antisocial behavior is... \u2018called forth\u2019 by... differential access to the approved opportunities for legitimate... pursuit of... cultural goals. Robert K. Merton","TOTAL INSTITUTIONS STRIP PEOPLE OF THEIR SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND THEIR SENSE OF SELF ERVING GOFFMAN (1922\u20131982)","","266 ERVING GOFFMAN W hen dealing with the These establishments bureaucratic procedures are the forcing houses IN CONTEXT that typify the modern for changing persons in world\u2014and the frustrations they our society. Each is a FOCUS engender\u2014most of us can escape natural experiment, Institutionalization into our private lives to maintain a typically harsh, on what sense of balance. However, there can be done to the self. KEY DATES are people for whom this is not an 1871 Henry Maudsley, a option because they spend all their Erving Goffman British psychiatrist, argues time in structured institutions, that asylums adversely affect such as prisons or asylums. calls \u201ctotal institutions.\u201d Asylums, individuals\u2019 sense of self. prisons and concentration camps, US sociologist Erving Goffman and even boarding schools and 1972 Psychological Survival, was interested in how people deal monasteries, are examples of this Stanley Cohen and Laurie with things when they cannot extreme form of organization. Taylor\u2019s study of a men\u2019s prison escape everyday rules and in Durham, UK, reveals that regulations. For his seminal study In \u201ctotal institutions,\u201d not inmates adapt behavior and Asylums, published in 1961, only are the inmates physically identity in order to survive. he investigated how the \u201cself\u201d separated from the outside world, adjusts to living in permanent they are frequently isolated for 1975 French thinker Michel and omnipresent bureaucracy. He extended periods of time, Foucault\u2019s Discipline and contended that the most important sometimes involuntarily. Due to Punish: The Birth of the Prison factor for a patient in a mental these peculiar circumstances, considers the ways in which hospital was not the illness but the such organizations develop prisons and asylums maintain institution\u2014and that the reactions particular ways of going about social order and conformity. and adjustments the affected person makes are found in inmates 1977 In Decarceration, US of other types of institution too. sociologist Andrew T. Scull contends that the trend Total institutions to reduce the number of Institutions that are closed off institutions for the mentally from the outside world\u2014often ill and prisoners leads to a physically by walls, fences, and greater lack of care. locked doors\u2014are what Goffman The goal of \u201ctotal institutions\u201d A person\u2019s former identity and is to in\ufb02uence the lives of sense of self is broken down... individuals comprehensively. \u201cTotal institutions\u201d strip ...and they are forced to adapt people of their support systems and become adjusted to the and their sense of self. goals of the institution.","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 267 See also: \u00c9mile Durkheim 34\u201337 \u25a0 Michel Foucault 52\u201355; 270\u201377 \u25a0 G.H. Mead 176\u201377 \u25a0 Ivan Illich 261 \u25a0 Howard S. Becker 280\u201385 their business. Within such places, Using his own observations and Alcatraz prison, US, is a powerful says Goffman, a relatively small drawing upon a range of published symbol of institutional dominance. number of staff supervise a much material, such as autobiographies Foucault saw prison as omnipotent, but larger group of inmates. They do and novels about similar Goffman argues inmates of institutions so using surveillance techniques institutions, Goffman concludes try to fashion life to meet their needs. to achieve compliance\u2014an that identity is shaped, and observation made by Michel adjusted, through interaction institution, and discover that Foucault in his 1975 study, which with others. He states that if the these same people are stripping depicted prisons as all-seeing, organization\u2019s key goals are to be them of their rights. In this way, all-powerful machines. Goffman\u2019s met, it is sometimes necessary to they lose their autonomy and additional insight was that inmates sideline of\ufb01cial practices and ideals experience humiliation and responded to \u201ctotal institutions\u201d while giving the impression they a challenge to their identity, by fashioning a new mode of life. are being upheld. perhaps by having their actions or their sanity questioned. Functionalist theory holds that Goffman maintains that the society is glued together by social social relationships and identities The admission to the hospital consensus\u2014an agreed sense that patients possessed before they continues this breaking-down of purpose. A \u201ctotal institution\u201d entered a mental institution give process: being photographed, works because it has goals, and way to wholly new identities that having personal possessions everything within it is targeted on are built around the ways in which con\ufb01scated, \ufb01ngerprints taken, and those goals. Goffman, who worked they adapt to life in their new undressing\u2014all these procedures in a US asylum between 1955 and institutional home. chip away at the \u201cold self.\u201d Goffman 1956, argues that alongside the argues that our sense of self is of\ufb01cial aims of the organization, Breaking down the self partly invested in our appearance, there exist other, invisible goals The process begins with the the things we own, and the clothes and practices that constitute a breaking down of the old self. we wear; if these are changed or crucial part of its functioning. He The patients are sometimes either taken away, people are given a calls this the \u201cunderlife of public forcibly committed or tricked message that they are no longer the institutions\u201d and he concentrates by family members and health person they were. Once admitted, on the world of the asylum patients professionals into entering an this feeling is continually \u276f\u276f to understand this \u201cunderlife.\u201d Bethlem Royal Hospital, London\u2019s notoriously chaotic asylum, from which the word \u201cBedlam\u201d is derived, was founded in 1247. It is now a modern psychiatric facility.","268 ERVING GOFFMAN \u201cMorti\ufb01cation of the self\u201d Clothes and Movement is Goffman\u2019s term for an possessions restrained institutional process whereby taken away an individual is stripped of New self a sense of self. A personal Old self identity is transformed into Individual an organizational identity\u2014as Hair cut medicated \u201cpatient\u201d or \u201cinmate.\u201d At the outset, the \u201cold self\u201d is partly de\ufb01ned by trappings, such as possessions and clothes. Within the institutional maze, by becoming a number, getting a haircut or a uniform, having freedom curtailed through physical restraints, and one\u2019s behavior modi\ufb01ed by rules, or perhaps through medication, a compliant \u201cnew self\u201d is forged. emphasized; for example, by having tries to conform to what is Although \u201ctotal institutions\u201d are to ask permission to go to the toilet. expected of the ideal patient. focused on producing standardized This adds to what Goffman calls a Colonization, according to Goffman, behavior, many inmates \ufb01nd ways \u201cmorti\ufb01cation of the self,\u201d which is is when the institution\u2019s regime to adjust. Goffman suggests that brought about by the humiliations engulfs the inmate, so that the humans can develop complex and degradations of such a life. world \u201cinside\u201d seems preferable to responses to the types of demands that outside and the inmate would on the self required by such Usual face-saving ways of be unable to function in the world organizations. He maintains that coping with these situations, such outside the institution. a process of secondary adjustment as sarcasm or profanity, are not enables individuals to create a new possible in \u201ctotal institutions\u201d Salvaging identity self, centered on the organization, because punishment will ensue. The second stage of a mental which inhabits the spaces not Inmates have to make a primary patient\u2019s progress is the salvaging taken by the rules and regulations. adjustment to this organizational of some sense of individuality. demand, and often end up in a These secondary adjustments placid state where they can be easily Many total institutions\u2026 comprise the \u201cunderlife\u201d of the controlled, enabling the institution seem to function merely as institution and are a means for the to function effectively. The system storage dumps for inmates, inmates to get by on a day-to-day of privileges and reward used by basis, produce a degree of the institution, in return for work in but\u2026 usually present autonomy, and retain some the kitchen or elsewhere, can help themselves to the public as personality. The most popular way to focus an inmate\u2019s energy and this is done, according to Goffman, attention, and give a new sense rational organizations. is by \u201cplaying it cool\u201d; generally of purpose and meaning, while Erving Goffman getting along with staff while keeping them compliant. carving out an identity and \u201cworking\u201d the system without In some cases, the institution overtly clashing with the rules. can overwhelm the inmate, Inmates can \ufb01nd and use what he resulting in either \u201cconversion\u201d refers to as \u201cdamp corners\u201d in the or \u201ccolonization.\u201d In an asylum, organization\u2014spaces such as conversion is when a patient kitchens, workshops, or the sick accepts a hospital\u2019s de\ufb01nition bay\u2014that provide an opportunity of them\u2014for example, as being to exert control over self and emotionally disturbed\u2014and then","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 269 situation. In such places, the as the US sociologist and One Flew Over the Cuckoo\u2019s Nest, inmates can create new criminologist John Irwin, have a novel by Ken Kesey, is set in an currencies\u2014for example, bargaining suggested Goffman\u2019s study was a asylum. It deals with patients adopting with tobacco or sweets\u2014or develop little narrow in its focus and was coping strategies, and how institutions particular ways of communicating limited by only observing inmates crush challenges to their authority. through a creative use of language. while in the institution. Some may try to maintain a facilities have been closed from the de\ufb01ant feeling of independence by Nevertheless, in seeing \u201ctotal 1960s onward as part of a process discreetly urinating on a radiator, institutions\u201d as places that, rather of deinstitutionalization in favor which will evaporate any signs than operating in the best interest of domiciled (\u201cin the community\u201d) of misbehavior, rather than ask of inmates, effectively dehumanize care, a signi\ufb01cant proportion of for permission to go to the toilet. them, Goffman\u2019s work has been people will still end their days in an Institutions will often turn a blind cited as precipitating changes institution. An aging population eye to such relatively minor in the treatment of mental health means that many citizens may be indiscretions in the knowledge patients. He lays bare the ways unable to live independent lives that these keep the inmate in which \u201ctotal institutions\u201d are and therefore have to spend time tractable for the most part. self-legitimatizing organizations\u2014 in nursing or care homes, which through de\ufb01ning their goals they can exhibit some of the negative Not everyone is successfully legitimate their activity, which hallmarks of \u201ctotal institutions.\u201d \u25a0 socialized into the norms of \u201ctotal in turn legitimates the measures institutions.\u201d Although Goffman they take to meet those goals. does not focus in detail on this, some inmates may retain a spirit of His work is also important for resistance and rebel by sabotaging the sociology of identity because of the plumbing, organizing mass his claims that names, possessions, refusal of particular foods, riots, and clothes are symbols imbued or even arranging for a member with meaning and importance for of staff to have \u201can accident.\u201d identity formation. He highlights the clear gap between of\ufb01cially Self-serving institutions imposed de\ufb01nitions of the self Despite writing in a cool, detached and the self that the individual tone, Goffman has been accused by seeks to present. some of over-identifying with the patients he observed. Others, such Goffman\u2019s studies remain of social relevance. Despite the fact that, in Britain, many mental health US city jails con\ufb01ne those arrested A crisis of incarceration Erving Goffman. He argued that but not yet charged or convicted. It city jails, which con\ufb01ne those is argued such institutions expose John Keith Irwin had a different arrested but not yet charged normal citizens to inmate culture. kind of \ufb01rst-hand experience of a or convicted, degrade and \u201ctotal institution\u201d than Goffman: dehumanize people. Rather than in 1952, he served \ufb01ve years in controlling the disreputable, prison for robbery. He used that they indoctrinate inmates into time to study and later gained a particular ways of behaving. PhD in sociology, becoming an expert in the US prison system He claims that these jails and the forms of social control are designed to manage the demanded by society. \u201cunderclass,\u201d or \u201crabble,\u201d who are seen as threatening middle- Based on his own insight and class values. The jails are interviews with prisoners, Irwin perceived to be holding-tanks wrote The Jail: Managing the for petty thieves, addicts, and Underclass in American Society sexual nonconformists, which (1985), which he dedicated to con\ufb01rms their outsider status.","GOVERNMENT IS THE RIGHT DISPOSITION OF THINGS MICHEL FOUCAULT (1926\u20131984)","","272 MICHEL FOUCAULT In the Middle Ages, there were two \u201crulers\u201d for every person in Europe\u2026 IN CONTEXT \u2026the monarch, who ruled \u2026the Church, which FOCUS by divine right and \u201cgoverned\u201d people\u2019s souls. Governmentality maintained the security KEY DATES and peace of his lands. 1513 In The Prince, Florentine political theorist Niccol\u00f2 These roles were then combined in secular government, Machiavelli offers advice which took care of the land (now the \u201cstate\u201d) and its people. on how to maintain power. Government increasingly became the art of managing \u201cthings\u201d 1567 French writer Guillaume in a rational way (\u201cgovernmentality\u201d). de la Perri\u00e8re argues in Le Miroir Politique that the word Government\u2019s role is to maximize \u201cgovernor\u201d can apply to a broad the welfare of its people\u2014to manage array of people and groups. the right disposition of things. 1979 Michel Foucault publishes an article entitled \u201cOn Governmentality.\u201d 1996 British sociologist Nikolas Rose examines how institutions such as prisons and schools shape the behavior of citizens. 2002 German sociologist Thomas Lemke applies Foucault\u2019s concept of governmentality to modern day neo-liberal societies. T hroughout history, people a series of lectures that became but a changing thing that depends have been concerned with a prominent feature of intellectual on both time and place. What the nature of government, life in the city. One of these is \u201crational\u201d in one space and where and how it is needed, and lectures was later published in time may be thought irrational the question of who has the right the in\ufb02uential journal Ideology in others. To summarize this to govern other people. French and Consciousness in 1979, under concept, Foucault joined the French philosopher Michel Foucault the title \u201cOn Governmentality.\u201d In words governeur (governor) and focused his study on the workings this work, Foucault argues that it mentalit\u00e9 (mentality) to create of power, and became particularly is impossible to study the formation a new term\u2014governmentality\u2014 interested in the processes and of power without also looking at to describe the way that a legitimacy of government in the practices\u2014the techniques government thinks about itself Western Europe from the 16th and rationality\u2014through which and its role (its \u201crationality\u201d). to 20th centuries. people are governed. This rationality is not an absolute that Foucault\u2019s approach to As a professor at the prestigious can be reached by pure reason, as philosophical analysis focuses Coll\u00e8ge de France in Paris between most philosophers have suggested, on the \u201cgenealogy of the subject.\u201d 1970 and 1975, Foucault delivered So rather than relying on the","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 273 See also: Michel Foucault 52\u201355; 302\u201303 \u25a0 David McCrone 163 \u25a0 Norbert Elias 180\u201381 \u25a0 Max Weber 220\u201323 \u25a0 Robert Michels 260 traditional approach to inquiry, offenders in the stocks, in order Peasant farmers worked on the land where philosophers look for the to integrate people into their during the Middle Ages making vast universal and invariant foundations community. This was the age pro\ufb01ts for their lords. Feudal systems of knowledge, Foucault looks at how of feudalism, when monarchs, imposed control on people, rather than a subject is constituted across who were seen as God\u2019s divine coherent government. history, and how this leads to its representatives on Earth, relied modern appearance. on various lords to keep the local A new way to govern people under control. The network According to Foucault, the question Foucault\u2019s series of lectures of lords with allegiance to a king of governing became a far greater on governmentality examined offered a way of maintaining order problem in the 16th century the ways in which the modern across large areas of land. when medieval feudalism fell into idea of an autonomous, individual decline. As the ideas of empire and self developed in concert with The lords earned their titles, territorial expansion began to take the idea of the nation-state. He castles, and land rights by hold, the question of how to govern was particularly interested in providing military service and the individual, the family, and the seeing how these two concepts support to the monarch. Eventually state became a central issue. co-determined each other\u2019s these privileges became hereditary. Governmentality was born. existence, and changed with the Peasant farmers, or serfs, were political rationality of the time. obliged to work the land, making The break with the feudal large pro\ufb01ts for their rulers. Such a system also led to a rise in con\ufb02ict Medieval governance system, in which there was a very between states. As a result, it Foucault\u2019s investigations trace the clear and obvious exercise of power became increasingly important that shifts in ways of governing that by individuals, meant that there a state knew both its own capacity have taken place in different eras was little sense of coherent and strength and the strength of its and places. Looking back to Europe governance: the various nobles rivals. Foucault claims this is why in the Middle Ages (c.500\u20131500), he often ruled in very different ways. the phenomenon of the \u201cpolice\u201d says that the modern nation-state Con\ufb02ict and internal warfare were emerged in the 16th century. as we know it did not exist; nor did also common. Monarchs\u2019 subjects These forces not only provided the governmentality. People lived in a did not think of themselves as government with security but were \u201cstate of justice\u201d that imposed blunt bound to a national identity but also able to measure and assess laws and customs, such as putting instead were tied to their locality the strength of the state. The police and aligned to their feudal lord. enabled the easy governance of \u276f\u276f I wanted to study the art of governing, that is to say, the reasoned way of governing best and, at the same time, re\ufb02ection on the best possible way of governing. Michel Foucault","274 MICHEL FOUCAULT German priest Martin Luther led the Protestant Reformation, which challenged the power of the Catholic Church and, argues Foucault, marked the beginning of a shift in governance. citizens, ensuring that individuals government as an ef\ufb01cient mode of example, King Charles I\u2019s belief under surveillance remain operation through an examination that he had a divine right to rule productive and compliant. of the political treatise The Prince brought him into armed con\ufb02ict (1513), by Florentine diplomat with parliamentary forces in the The 16th century also saw Niccol\u00f2 Machiavelli. In this short English Civil War. Charles was a signi\ufb01cant shift in religious work, the prince is seen as being tried, convicted of high treason, practice in Europe. The Protestant fundamentally concerned with and executed in 1649. Reformation, which began in maintaining and expanding his 1517, was a major challenge to territories; his subjects living on Benevolent government? the Catholic Church and its power. those lands are of little interest or Foucault highlights French According to Foucault, the con\ufb02ict consequence, as long as they are Renaissance writer Guillaume that took place between the behaving themselves. The prince de la Perriere\u2019s 1567 de\ufb01nition of Protestant and Catholic Churches, remains morally detached from government, which was signi\ufb01cant together with the rise of territorial his territory\u2014he owes no one any because of its lack of reference to states, led early modern theorists obligation or debt. This is the way \u201cterritory.\u201d Instead, government of government to combine two of thinking that came to an end as was described here as the correct very differing ways of thinking. monarchs lost their sovereign disposition of things, organized Theologians had always rights, the Churches lost power, to lead to a convenient end. Under approached governance from a and new technologies (such as an ideology of benevolence, the spiritual perspective: the pastoral the printing press) allowed for the responsibilities of governments leader\u2019s ultimate duty was to save spread of revolutionary ideas. were expanded to include the souls by watching over his \u201c\ufb02ock\u201d welfare of their citizens, although in as a shepherd would guard his From the late Middle Ages to reality, this form of governance was sheep. Secular statesmen had the 17th century, the Renaissance really concerned with managing approached the art of government ushered in a return to classical people\u2019s lives\u2014and the material in much more worldly terms\u2014 ideas of freedom and democracy, products of their efforts\u2014in order seeing their role as managing followed by more revolutionary to maximize the nation\u2019s strength. con\ufb02ict, protecting the territory, thinking that threatened the Ensuring the growth of wealth was and securing peace. These two physical safety of monarchs as well seen as crucial in governing, but it ways of thinking, Foucault argues, as their right to rule. In England, for came together to form a new hybrid art of governance in the late 16th and 17th centuries. Death of the prince For the \ufb01rst time, it seemed possible that the citizens and their rulers could be brought together in a system that was mutually bene\ufb01cial. The personal interest of the rulers was no longer the sole guiding principle for ruling; with this shift, the idea of \u201cruling\u201d was transformed into \u201cgoverning.\u201d Foucault traces the shift from a sovereign notion of power to","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 275 was also important to have a political questions, including the Let us not... ask... why certain healthy populace that would rights and responsibilities of the people want to dominate... Let multiply if the government wanted individual and the state. In what to secure long-term prosperity and ways can an individual be free, if us ask, instead, how things productivity. Foucault says that he or she is governed by the state? work at the level of... processes, from this point onward, \u201cmen and The link between the \u201cautonomous\u201d things\u201d (the relation people have to individual\u2019s self-control and political which subject our bodies, wealth, the environment, famine, control became an important issue, govern our gestures, dictate fertility, the climate, and so on), as did the possibility of domination rather than territories, needed to and economic exploitation. our behaviors. be administered in an ef\ufb01cient way. Michel Foucault Governance was now an \u201cart.\u201d In examining this period, Foucault revisited his work on Governmentality refers to the ways Citizen or subject? \u201cpassive bodies.\u201d In Discipline and in which societies are decentered Foucault contends that early liberal Punish, he had traced how the body and citizens play an active role in ideas of civil society, as espoused was seen as a target (to be used their own self-governance; it is the by John Locke and Adam Ferguson and improved) by those in power relationship between public power in the 18th century, made a social during the 17th and 18th centuries. and private freedom that is central. government possible. The liberal He also examined how techniques art of government has as its of surveillance drawn from The art of government organizational principle \u201cthe monasteries and the army were Foucault claims that govermentality rationale of least government\u201d; in used to control people\u2019s bodies and is important because it provides other words, it advocates less state produce passive subjects who were a link between what he calls intervention and an increased focus incapable of revolt. the \u201ctechnologies of the self\u201d on the role of the population. At this (the creation of the individual time the concept of a \u201cpopulation\u201d In this earlier work, Foucault subject) and the \u201ctechnologies of \u276f\u276f and its centrality to the success of maintained that discipline creates the state became paramount, and docility, but when focusing on led to the idea of \u201can individual governmentality, he began to think member of the population\u201d as a this placed too much emphasis on living, working, and social being. domination and was too simplistic The new idea of an autonomous an argument. Individuals, he now individual was to lead to many new said, have more opportunities to modify and construct themselves than he had thought previously. Dieters regulate and discipline Governing the body Slimming companies and diets themselves according to mass constitute disciplinary practices standards and cultural requirements Weight-loss organizations, such as that promise an \u201cimproved self,\u201d rather than through individual choice. Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig, but they also subject women to illustrate Foucault\u2019s notion of patriarchal (male-dominated) governance of the self that sits in ideas about what a woman line with \u201cnormal\u201d ideas of the \u201cshould\u201d look like and how she time. While these organizations should behave. This necessity develop a person\u2019s sense of self to conform to current standards and worth, they also envelop them of \u201cnormal\u201d transforms dieting in a web of power that ultimately from an eating behavior into a bene\ufb01ts huge corporations. moral imperative. US feminists Sandra Bartky and Susan Bordo Many feminists, such as US argue that this is indicative writer Kim Chernin, have argued of the ways in which women that the quest for the perfect body become, simultaneously, both through dieting places women subjects and subjected. within a \u201ctyranny of slenderness.\u201d","276 MICHEL FOUCAULT If one wants to analyze on a multi-layered web. Where once The dream or nightmare of the genealogy of the subject governing rested on violence\u2014or a society programmed\u2026 by the threat of violence\u2014this is now the \u201ccold monster\u201d of the state in Western civilization, just one element of control. Other is profoundly limiting as a way he has to take into account systems that hold sway in current of rendering intelligible the forms of governing are coercive not only techniques of strategies, and those that structure way we are governed. domination but also and shape the possible forms Nikolas Rose techniques of the self. of action citizens may take. Michel Foucault Governing by fear and violence British sociologist (1947\u2013) is much less effective than domination\u201d (the formation employing more subtle forms of considered governmentality in of the state). This is because, control, such as de\ufb01ning limited relation to cigarette smoking according to Foucault, \u201cgovernment\u201d choices or using disciplinary among Chinese physicians. His does not have a purely political institutions like schools to guide 2008 paper \u201cSmoking Among meaning. From the 18th century the behavior of individuals. In this Doctors: Governmentality, until relatively recently, government way, self-control becomes linked Embodiment, and the Diversion was a broad concept that embraced to political rule and economic of Blame in Contemporary China\u201d guidance for the family, household exploitation. What appears to be looks at the ways smoking among management, and guidance for the individual choice just \u201chappens to health professionals was suggested soul, as well as more conventional be\u201d also to the bene\ufb01t of the state. to be the cause of high smoking politics. Foucault describes this In this way, Foucault suggests rates among the public. Public all-embracing form of government that the modern nation-state health campaigns targeted these as \u201cthe conduct of conduct.\u201d In the and the modern autonomous doctors, blaming them for tobacco- modern world, governing is more individual rely on one another related diseases in China and than simple top-down power for their existence. calling on them to govern their own relationships, Foucault says; it rests bodies and stop smoking. Governmentality in action Foucault\u2019s view of governmentality as the effort to shape and guide choices and lifestyles of groups and individuals has been further developed by many contemporary scholars. For example, US anthropologist Matthew Kohrman The individual and the state The individual became Domination by the The rise of the Citizens participate in recognized as important in monarchy and the Church individual (late 16th\u2013 their own governance politics, Foucault claims, when (from the 18th century). the ideas of the divine right (c.6th\u201316th centuries). 17th century). of kings and the infallibility of the Catholic Church were challenged. The task for any government then became how to \ufb01nd a way to conspicuously act for the people, while nevertheless continuing to build its own strength.","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 277 Foucault\u2019s vision of the modern agreed-upon goals and procedures Barack Obama\u2019s 2008 US presidency nation-state as a governmentalized of a society that are so \u201cobvious\u201d campaign had supporters chanting whole is not without its critics. He that they are seen as \u201cnormal.\u201d \u201cYes We Can!,\u201d implying government has, for instance, been charged In the 21st century these include by the people. The tactic echoes with being vague and inconsistent behaviors such as recycling, Foucault\u2019s concept of self-government.\u00a0\u00a0 in his de\ufb01nition of governmentality. losing weight, being involved in Philosopher Derek Kerr has argued Neighborhood Watch schemes, established in many ways, from that Foucault\u2019s de\ufb01nition \u201cbeheads or quitting smoking. cultural artifacts to government social subjectivity,\u201d by seeming discourse on family values. to do away with free, subjective Foucault claims that the ways Political policies may also be used choice. Canadian sociologists we think and talk about health, to put weight behind particular Danica Dupont and Frank Pearce work, family and so on, encourage ideas, such as the family, through accuse Foucault of taking a rather us to behave in particular ways. incentives such as tax breaks. simplistic and idealistic reading People govern themselves and of Western political history, seeing others according to what they British academic Nikolas Rose, it as \u201cthe growth of a plant from a believe to be true. For instance, drawing on Foucault\u2019s key ideas, seed,\u201d which overcomes obstacles many societies view monogamous, has written persuasively on the to realize its true potential (as heterosexual marriage as the \u201cdeath of the social\u201d and the though this were always implicit, \u201ccorrect\u201d environment for bringing ways in which the individual in in some way). up children, and this \u201ctruth\u201d is the neo-liberal state has to govern his or her access to state services Neo-liberalism Foucault\u2019s work permanently with little or no help. It is through Nevertheless, Foucault\u2019s idea changes one\u2019s understanding perspectives such as this, Foucault of governmentality remains a of how people are governed says, that we can see the ways in powerful conceptual tool with which power is repressive, even which to unpick and critique neo- in modern society. while it appears to be acting in liberalism. This is the post-war, Brent Pickett the interests of the individual. post-welfare politics and economics Foucault argues that political of the late 20th century, whereby US political scientist control\u2014the art of governance\u2014 the state, in many respects, rolled is most effective when it presents back its responsibilities to its everything it offers as an act of citizens. In his lectures, Foucault free choice. Modern neo-liberalist discussed neo-liberalism in three governments have found perhaps post-war states: West Germany, the most dangerous way to France, and the US. This form govern\u2014by giving the impression of governance has been described that they are not governing at all. \u25a0 as the triumph of capitalism over the state, or as \u201canti-humanism,\u201d owing to its emphasis on the individual and the destruction of community bonds. In neo-liberal thinking, the worker is viewed as a self-owned enterprise and is required to be competitive. Neo-liberalism relies on the notion of responsible, rational individuals who are capable of taking responsibility for themselves, their lives, and their environment, particularly through \u201cnormalizing technologies\u201d\u2014the","278 RELIGION HAS LOST ITS PLAUSIBILITY AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE BRYAN WILSON (1926\u20132004) IN CONTEXT Fewer people involve Religion has lost themselves in religious its plausibility FOCUS and social Secularization practices. signi\ufb01cance. KEY DATES Fewer people believe 1904\u201305 Max Weber claims in religious thought. there is a strong relationship between rationalization and Religious organizations secularization. are less involved in 1966 Austrian-American matters of state. sociologists Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann T owns and cities across on social life, institutions, and the suggest that the loss of Britain contain churches individual. Using statistical data religion\u2019s authoritative voice and chapels that have been on various aspects of religious life, has led to a legitimation crisis. converted into pubs, showrooms, he notes that, according to polls, and apartments. British sociologist fewer children are being baptized 1978 British sociologist David Bryan Wilson, writing between the in the Church of England, fewer Martin argues that the alleged 1960s and early 1990s, argues that people take part in the Easter decline of religion cannot be a process of secularization is taking communion, and more people say measured in statistical terms. place. By this he means that the that they do not believe in God. importance of the supernatural and 1985 US sociologists Rodney the sacred is declining; religion, Wilson cites modernity\u2014 Stark and William Bainbridge he suggests, has less in\ufb02uence industrialization, the development claim that religion is here to of the state, and the advances in stay because people need the solace of the supernatural. 1992 Traditional religions have had to adapt and become less \u201creligious\u201d in order to survive, according to British sociologist Steve Bruce.","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 279 See also: Auguste Comte 22\u201325 \u25a0 Karl Marx 28\u201331; 254\u201359 \u25a0 \u00c9mile Durkheim 34\u201337 \u25a0 Max Weber 38\u201345; 220\u201323 \u25a0 J\u00fcrgen Habermas 286\u201387 \u25a0 Michel Maffesoli 291 \u25a0 Michel Foucault 302\u201303 science and technology that come their marginalized position and The Unification Church is one with it\u2014as contributing to this have to adapt to changing moral of several new religious movements decline in the importance of values. As old orders crumble, that, according to Wilson, point to religious thought in society. people seek new assurances. fragmentation and secularization in the modern world. Initially, he suggests, religion Social fragmentation has was not defeated outright in the brought with it cultural pluralism: idea of secularization has received modern world, but had to compete alternative beliefs compete for stark criticism. British journalist with other claims to truth. But popularity, and religions have Michael Prowse, for example, says eventually science became too become more private. In this sense, the idea is out of date and that formidable an adversary. There has for Wilson, secularization is linked there is evidence for the continuing been a consequent disengagement to a decline in community. Rather vitality of religion. The popularity of state and church into separate than being indicative of the of church-going in the US and the domains, in contrast to their longevity of religion, he sees new growth of non-Christian religions in closeness in the Middle Ages. And religious movements (NRMs), such Britain, particularly Islam, certainly the role of religion in schools is as Scientology, as \u201canti-cultural\u201d: endorse this view. \u25a0 negligible, as it is in the workplace, they symbolize a destructuring where the principles of organization of society and do not contribute to have little room for religious myths. the maintenance of social order and control. They are unable to channel God is dead? their religious expression into a Wilson, like Karl Marx, believes form that might have signi\ufb01cant that world religions such as repercussions in modern society. Christianity and Judaism play a role in maintaining the status quo Many key thinkers of the 19th by socializing new generations century, such as Marx, Durkheim, into accepting social divisions. But and Comte, believed that religion with modernity, religion has lost its would lose its signi\ufb01cance with authority to instruct people in what the advent of industrialization. to believe and how to behave. He But in recent years, despite having states that churches are aware of several supporters, including British sociologist Steve Bruce, the [The] content of the message Bryan Wilson interest in new religious that the churches seek to movements and sects, and was promote, and the attitudes Bryan Ronald Wilson was born a staunch advocate of freedom and values that it tries to in Leeds, England, in 1926. He of religious thought. In addition was awarded his PhD from the to his fascination with religion, encourage, no longer inform London School of Economics and he wrote extensively on youth much of our national life. went on to become a lecturer at culture and education. Wilson Bryan Wilson the University of Leeds, where suffered from Parkinson\u2019s he taught for seven years. He disease for several years. He then moved to the University died in 2004, aged 78. of Oxford, and remained there for 30 years, until his retirement Key works in 1993. Wilson was president of the International Society 1966 Religion in Secular Society for the Sociology of Religion 1973 Magic and the Millennium from 1971 to 1975. Although 1990 The Social Dimensions of an agnostic, he had a lifelong Sectarianism","OUR IDENTITY AND BEHAVIOR ARE DETERMINED BY HOW WE ARE DESCRIBED AND CLASSIFIED HOWARD S. BECKER (1928\u2013 )","","282 HOWARD S. BECKER Powerful people Individuals are in society found guilty of these IN CONTEXT de\ufb01ne certain acts acts and labeled FOCUS as deviant. as outsiders. Labeling theory So they internalize All their future KEY DATES the label and actions are tagged 1938 Austrian-US historian Frank Tannenbaum argues behave accordingly. with the label. that criminal behavior is the result of con\ufb02ict between Our identity and behavior one group and the community are determined by how we are at large. described and classi\ufb01ed. 1951 Social Pathology, by US sociologist Edwin Lemert, introduces the idea of primary and secondary deviancy. 1969 Authorities create deviant identities, says US sociologist David Matza in Becoming Deviant. 1976 US sociologist Aaron Cicourel suggests that the police operate with a stereotype of the deviant as a young, working-class male; these youths are therefore far more likely to be sentenced than middle-class youths who commit crimes. A lthough many people of people, committed crime. In by young, working-class men, they in society break the contrast, labeling theory questions are far more likely to be labeled law\u2014for example, by why some acts are thought to as hooligans or criminals. exceeding the speed limit or be deviant and who has the power stealing stationery from work\u2014 to label some people\u2019s behavior According to labeling theorists, only some are regarded as real as deviant; it then examines this is because rule-makers, such criminals. Labeling theory, the impact of such labeling as judges and politicians, tend to which emerged from a mistrust on society and the individual. be middle or upper class and treat of government powers in post-war the infractions of their own kind Britain and the US in the 1960s Consider this example: If a more leniently than the deviance of and 70s, considers why this is so. group of young, middle-class working-class people. Our concept men on a stag night are drunk of deviance comes, the theorists Proponents of labeling theory and disorderly in a town center, argue, not so much from what argue that criminologists once the authorities are likely to people do, as how others respond to tended to conceptualize criminals attribute their behavior to youthful it\u2014labeling is a political act. This as types of people, asking why exuberance. But if a similar school of thought\u2014which has particular individuals, or groups disturbance is caused connections with the work of \u00c9mile","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 283 See also: \u00c9mile Durkheim 34\u201337 \u25a0 Ferdinand T\u00f6nnies 32\u201333 \u25a0 Edward Said 80\u20138 \u25a0 Elijah Anderson 82\u201383 \u25a0 G.H. Mead 176\u201377 \u25a0 Erving Goffman 190\u201395 \u25a0 Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis 288\u201389 \u25a0 Stanley Cohen 290 Deviant behavior behavior has become sanctioned to view such behaviors. Only those is behavior that within a given society. For example, who have power can make a label people so label. \u201cterrorists\u201d are accused of murder, stick; institutions such as the Howard S. Becker but the army may legally kill criminal justice system can ensure terrorists. And among Western that a deviant label will follow an nations, as recently as the 1990s, individual. Rather than being a husband forcing intercourse on universal, deviance is relative\u2014 his wife was not guilty of rape, it depends on who commits it according to the law. Becker claims and how it is responded to. that it is not the act itself that is deviant; the response of society Moral entrepreneurs de\ufb01nes it as such and, crucially, Coining a label that has proved the responses of the powerful extremely useful in the social determine how society is expected sciences, Becker identi\ufb01es \u276f\u276f Durkheim, G.H. Mead, and the A group of privileged undergraduates who smash up a restaurant Chicago School in the US\u2014is when fueled by alcohol may be accused of student high jinks, while particularly associated with the a group of working-class boys displaying identical behavior may work of US sociologists Howard be labeled as delinquents. S. Becker and Edwin Lemert. Types of deviancy Privileged students Working-class youths Lemert distinguished between the ideas of \u201cprimary\u201d and \u201csecondary\u201d Criminal damage or youthful exuberance? deviancy. According to him, primary deviance is when a crime HIGH JINKS DELINQUENT or other act is committed, but is not of\ufb01cially labeled as deviant, either because it went unnoticed or because the perpetrator was considered to be acting out of character. Either way, it does not attach a label of \u201cdeviant\u201d to the individual. Secondary deviance is the effect that society\u2019s reaction has on an individual. If someone commits a crime, and is caught and labeled as criminal or deviant, they may change their behavior in the future to live up to that label. In Outsiders (1963), Becker developed a number of Lemert\u2019s ideas and laid the foundations for what became known as labeling theory. He argued that there is no such thing as a deviant act: how we respond to an act depends on whether a particular form of","284 HOWARD S. BECKER The \ufb01lm Reefer Madness (1936) are always people in positions of investigate how they progressed was a thinly disguised piece of relative power, who use that power through the various stages of a propaganda that charts the downfall to get their own way by either deviant \u201ccareer\u201d and noted that of a respectable high-school couple imposing their will on others, \ufb01rst-time marijuana smokers who are corrupted by marijuana use. or by negotiating with them. had to learn how to perceive and subsequently enjoy the effects of \u201cmoral entrepreneurs\u201d as the people Becker illustrated the actions the drug. Without this learning in society who have the power to of moral entrepreneurs through the process, he said, taking the drug label others. They task themselves case study of a publicity campaign could be unpleasant or apparently with the role of persuading others that was run by the Federal Bureau have no effect whatsoever. to see the world in a way that suits of Investigation (FBI) in the US Learning was central to the their own moral beliefs. They fall in 1937. The goal was to ban the meaning of the deviant act\u2014 into two types: rule creators and recreational use of marijuana. The people only willingly learned what rule enforcers. The position and moral entrepreneurs\u2019 distaste for was meaningful to them\u2014and identity of moral entrepreneurs public displays of enjoyment or individuals became fully \ufb02edged varies between societies, but they ecstasy, coupled with a Protestant \u201cdope smokers\u201d only when they concern for respectability and self- learned how to hide the habit from The process of making control, led to the push for legal the \u201cstraight\u201d or \u201csquare\u201d world. a criminal... is a process change. The FBI, according If the smoker was caught and to Becker, used various means to charged or arrested, their deviant of tagging, de\ufb01ning, achieve their goals; these included status was likely to be con\ufb01rmed. identifying, segregating. propaganda such as the \ufb01lm Reefer Becker reasoned that following Frank Tannenbaum Madness, as well as public debate a deviant career has its rewards, and political lobbying. though they do not come from Austrian-US historian (1893\u20131969) wider society; instead, they come Deviant \u201ccareers\u201d from feeling a sense of belonging Becker was particularly interested to a group that is united by its in individuals who internalized opposition to the world at large. the label of deviancy, making it their de\ufb01ning characteristic, Labeling critics and went on to adopt lifestyles Despite its in\ufb02uence and continued with deviancy as a central feature. popularity, a number of criticisms He studied marijuana users to can be leveled at labeling theory. The British sociologist Jock Young, for example, points to the fact that much labeling theory focuses The rule-breaker might feel his judges are outsiders. Howard S. Becker","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 285 Social groups create complained that Becker\u2019s deviants Howard S. Becker deviance by making the passively accept the labels forced rules whose infraction upon them, rather than \ufb01ghting Born in Chicago, US, in back. Gouldner challenges Becker\u2019s 1928, sociologist Howard constitutes deviance. theory by saying people frequently Saul Becker became involved Howard S. Becker \ufb01ght back in their own defense: free in the world of music from will is far stronger than Becker\u2019s an early age. By the age of 15 on marginal deviancy rather work implies. he was working as a semi- than more \u201cserious\u201d crimes, and professional pianist in bars therefore ignores the fact that Academics such as Becker have and clubs and was regularly some crimes, such as murder, are also been accused of romanticizing exposed to the drug culture almost universally condemned, the underdog; in response, Becker that he later made the subject and are not subject to alternative has stated that \u201cunconventional of his studies. After studying perceptions of deviancy. Alvin sentimentality\u2026 is the lesser evil.\u201d sociology at the University Gouldner, a US sociologist, has But Becker\u2019s work forces us to of Chicago, most of his ask important questions about academic career was spent In a study of jazz musicians, power relationships and justice in at Northwestern University. Becker proposed that their \u201cdeviant\u201d society and has been signi\ufb01cant Becker has received many lifestyle set them apart from society, for a number of theorists who focus awards during his academic which caused them to develop values on deviancy. US sociologist David career, including the Award that reinforced their deviancy. Matza, for instance, develops for a Career of Distinguished many of Becker\u2019s ideas by arguing Scholarship from the that what becomes a crime is the American Sociological outcome of decisions and actions Association in 1998. Becker taken by governments and agents is known for his academic of the state. According to this generosity\u2014although mainly process, both the criminal and retired, he continues to help their act are seen as abnormal doctoral students with their and yet from the perspective work and offers advice of the deviant, the deviancy is on how to publish their theses. entirely normal behavior. \u25a0 Music\u2014jazz in particular\u2014 remains a subject of personal and research interest for him. Key works 1963 Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance 1982 Art Worlds 1998 Tricks of the Trade","286 ECONOMIC CRISIS IS IMMEDIATELY TRANSFORMED INTO SOCIAL CRISIS J\u00dcRGEN HABERMAS (1929\u2013 ) IN CONTEXT Late-capitalist societies K arl Marx argued that experience periodic capitalist societies are FOCUS prone to economic crises Legitimation crisis economic downturns. and that these will worsen over time, culminating in a workers\u2019 KEY DATES Policies to cope with this revolution. But why is it that 1867 In Das Kapital, Karl Marx may seem unfair to the when a society has such a crisis, suggests that capitalism is a somewhat different change in prone to economic crises. majority of voters. the political climate often follows? 1929 The stock exchange When this happens, citizens This was the question posed crash on Wall Street, New question the authority by the German sociologist J\u00fcrgen York, leads to a ten-year of government. Habermas in the early 1970s. He economic depression that was intrigued by the relationship affects all Western economies. Demonstrations and between capitalism and crises, protests threaten the having seen the system survive 1950\u201360s Talcott Parsons legitimacy of the state. a series of extraordinary events discusses legitimation and such as the Wall Street Crash of soical order, claiming that Economic crisis 1929 in the US, the subsequent through socialization people is immediately Great Depression, the rise and fall acquire values that lead them transformed into of fascist movements in Europe, to conform to social norms. World War II, and the Cold War. social crisis. 2007 Global economic Habermas suggests that recession results in a swing traditional Marxist theories across Europe to parties of of crisis tendencies are not the political right. applicable to some Western late-capitalist societies. This 2009 Chilean sociologist is because these societies have Rodrigo Cordero Vega argues, become more democratic and contrary to Habermas, that have changed signi\ufb01cantly thanks Marx remains relevant to welfare-state policies, such to contemporary society. as free healthcare provision, that aim to make up for economic inequalities. In addition, he says, collective identities have fragmented","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 287 See also: Adam Ferguson 21 \u25a0 Karl Marx 28\u201331 \u25a0 Herbert Marcuse 182\u201387 \u25a0 Daniel Bell 224\u201325 \u25a0 Michel Foucault 270\u201377 \u25a0 Stanley Cohen 290 and there is evidence of increased has the dif\ufb01cult task of balancing J\u00fcrgen Habermas individualization and fewer the pursuit for capital with class-based con\ufb02icts. maintaining mass support. Born in D\u00fcsseldorf, Germany, In other words, state policies must in 1929, J\u00fcrgen Habermas\u2019s Crisis of legitimacy favor business and property owners political awakening came Although the economic cycles of while appearing to represent the when, as a teenager in the prosperity and recession continue, interests of all. This means the Hitler Youth, he witnessed the policy measures by nation-states conditions exist for government aftermath of World War II and have enabled them to avert major institutions to suffer the Holocaust\u2014events that crises. Unlike earlier capitalist a large-scale loss of legitimacy. inform much of his work. societies, under state-regulated late-capitalism, the primary site of If citizens sense that the Habermas is one of the crisis and con\ufb02ict has shifted to government is just and benevolent, world\u2019s foremost contemporary the cultural and political spheres. then they will show support. If, social thinkers. Many of his however, they feel that policies are writings are concerned with The crisis of modern Western not in their interests, people will knowledge communication society is, according to Habermas, respond with political apathy or and the changing nature of one of legitimation. Legitimacy even large-scale discontent and the public and private spheres. has become the focal concern protests. Given a threat to the He was born with a cleft because the state, as manager status quo, a government may try palate, which affected his of the \u201cfree market\u201d economy, has to appease its citizens with short- speech and, at times, left him simultaneously to solve economic lived social welfare measures. socially isolated in his youth. problems, ensure democracy, and The experience in\ufb02uenced his please the voters. If the public feels Habermas says democratic work on communication. government policies are unfair, capitalism is an \u201cun\ufb01nished it withdraws its support for the project,\u201d implying the social system He studied sociology and government. The state therefore can be further improved. Western philosophy in Frankfurt at the governments\u2019 actions since the Institute for Social Research, Riot police in Athens, Greece, in global \ufb01nancial crisis began in under Max Horkheimer and 2011 confront demonstrators claiming 2007 have exposed many social Theodor Adorno, who both that government austerity measures to tensions between narrow capital helped originate critical deal with sovereign debt favor the few interests, the public interest, mass theory, and in the late 1960s at the expense of the many. democracy, and the need to secure he became director of the institutional legitimacy. \u25a0 Institute for Social Research. Key works 1968 Knowledge and Human Interests 1973 Legitimation Crisis 1981 The Theory of Communicative Action","288 SCHOOLING HAS BEEN AT ONCE SOMETHING DONE TO THE POOR AND FOR THE POOR SAMUEL BOWLES (1939\u2013 ) AND HERBERT GINTIS (1940\u2013 ) IN CONTEXT Schools prepare the poor Schools for the poor are to function well and established as part of the FOCUS uncomplainingly within the The hidden curriculum hierarchical structure popular program of of the modern workplace. free education to achieve KEY DATES 1968 In Life in Classrooms, US social equality. sociologist Philip W. Jackson claims that children are Schooling has been at once something socialized in the classroom done to the poor and for the poor. via a \u201chidden curriculum.\u201d S chools exist to prepare less favorable interpretation and 1973 According to Pierre children for adulthood and since then several sociological Bourdieu, the reproduction society, but in the 1960s the approaches have developed. of \u201ccultural capital\u201d (the benign consensus about this fact ability to recognize cultural of modern life began to fragment. The most radical perspective references, to know how At the end of that decade the term comes from US economists Samuel to act appropriately in different \u201chidden curriculum\u201d was coined by Bowles and Herbert Gintis, who social situations, and so on) Philip W. Jackson, who claimed argue in Schooling in Capitalist explains middle-class success. that elements of socialization take America (1976) that education place in school that are not part of is not a neutral sphere but one 1978 Kathleen Clarricoates\u2019 the formal educational curriculum. where the needs of capitalism are British study indicates Although \u00c9mile Durkheim had reproduced by implicitly creating that gender inequity, to the observed this imparting of values attitudes among young people detriment of girls, forms part decades earlier, it was now given a that prepare them for work that of the implicit curriculum. alienates them in their future lives. 1983 Henry Giroux, US cultural critic, suggests that hidden curriculums are plural, operating along lines of gender and ethnicity as well as social class.","See also: \u00c9mile Durkheim 34\u201337 \u25a0 Pierre Bourdieu 76\u201379 \u25a0 THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 289 Erving Goffman 264\u201369 \u25a0 Paul Willis 292\u201393 \u25a0 Talcott Parsons 300\u201301 Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis According to Bowles and Gintis, The structure of social Both Samuel Bowles, born schools exist to reproduce social relations in education\u2026 in New Haven, Connecticut, inequalities. Therefore, the best inures the student to the and Herbert Gintis, born in predictor for a child\u2019s future is the discipline of the workplace. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, economic status of parents, rather received doctoral degrees from than academic achievement or Samuel Bowles & Harvard University and they intelligence. Although the explicit Herbert Gintis have since worked extensively curriculum is about equality of with one another. They were opportunity, education\u2019s prime role as superior and this shapes what is invited by the US civil rights is not to teach the skills needed in taught, thus people learn to respect leader Martin Luther King the world of work, but to instill into things perceived as upper class and Jr. to write educational children the \u201chidden curriculum.\u201d deride those considered working background papers for the class. For example, working-class Poor People\u2019s March of 1968. Working-class children are children might be taught that Much of their work, which has taught their place in society and classical music is superior to been described as Marxist, learn that qualities such as working popular music, and that it is too argues that many social hard, deference, punctuality, and dif\ufb01cult for them to understand, institutions, such as schools, following orders are prized. These whereas middle-class children are are characterized by the traits are rewarded, while creativity taught how to appreciate it. In a disciplinary exercise of power. and independent thought are similar way, middle-class children not valued. This maintains the are taught the qualities that will They were both hired in economic status quo, which needs enable them to become leaders. So, 1973 to join the economics industrious, uncritical employees. lower-class children face systematic department at the University bias against them in the system. of Massachusetts. Gintis still Bowles and Gintis claim that works there, but Bowles left early 19th-century schools in the Many sociologists, such as in 2001 to join the Santa Fe US were set up to assimilate British academic Diane Reay, Institute as research professor immigrants into the \u201cAmerican\u201d contend that schools have not and director of behavioral work ethic. Crucially, there is a become vehicles for economic sciences, and he is also a \u201ccorrespondence\u201d between the opportunity. The work of Bowles professor of economics at the hierarchical social relations within and Gintis still has much resonance University of Siena. Recent the school system and those found because there has been little collaborations have focused on in the economic system. The nature progress for the working classes cultural and genetic evolution, of work also has similarities: pupils over the last century. The poor are asking why large groups of have little control over what they simply better educated than in the unrelated individuals gather study and neither do they study for past. Throughout Western society, together cooperatively. the inherent value of knowledge; \u201creal\u201d incomes for the poorest have like workers, they are \u201calienated.\u201d been falling, inequality has been Key works Schools teach children that social increasing, and it is common to inequalities are just and inevitable, \ufb01nd graduates in low-paid work. \u25a0 1976 Schooling in Capitalist and therefore education can be America: Educational Reform seen as a form of social control. and the Contradictions of Economic Life Class matters 1986 Democracy and In France, Pierre Bourdieu took a Capitalism: Property, different view and suggested that Community, and the the hidden curriculum is achieved Contradictions of Modern through the cultural reproduction of Social Thought knowledge. The dominant class is 2005 Unequal Chances: Family able to de\ufb01ne its culture and values Background and Economic Success (eds.)","290 SOCIETIES ARE SUBJECT, EVERY NOW AND THEN, TO PERIODS OF MORAL PANIC STANLEY COHEN (1942\u20132013) IN CONTEXT S o important is the panics re\ufb02ect deep-seated sociological concept of anxieties. Media attention may FOCUS \u201cmoral panics\u201d that the term create a \u201cself-ful\ufb01lling prophecy\u201d Moral panics is now widely used by journalists by encouraging the behaviors it and politicians. The idea emerged reports. Moral panics can be short- KEY DATES in the 1970s, partly from South lived and die down when they are 1963 Outsiders: Studies in the African-born sociologist Stanley seen to be dealt with, or they may Sociology of Deviance, Howard Cohen\u2019s Folk Devils and Moral form part of a larger, ongoing panic. Becker\u2019s study of labeling, Panics (1972), which was inspired lays the foundations for moral by media-aggravated con\ufb02icts The concept of moral panics panic theory by discussing in 1964 in the UK between youth continues to be used by academics, how people\u2019s behavior can groups known as mods and rockers. such as British sociologist Angela clash with societal norms. McRobbie, to describe the role Cohen examines how groups the media plays in creating deviant 1964 Media exaggeration of and individuals are identi\ufb01ed as acts and justifying increased social clashes between \u201cmods\u201d and a threat to dominant social values, control of marginalized groups. \u25a0 \u201crockers\u201d youth subcultures in and how the media plays a key role the UK sparks a moral panic. in amplifying this, presenting them The 9\/11 attacks in New York, in negative or stereotyped ways, sparked moral panics about \u201cterrorism,\u201d 1971 In The Drug Takers: The thus creating a national panic. The leading to widespread Islamophobia\u2014 Social Meaning of Drug Use, media is an in\ufb02uential institution prejudice against Muslims or those Scottish academic Jock Young, that often re\ufb02ects the values of the perceived as Muslims. a friend of Stanley Cohen, powerful and represents issues so discusses the idea of moral that the public are enticed to agree panic in relation to the social with \u201cexperts\u201d (politicians and the meaning of drug-taking. police, for example) on how best to deal with the problem. 1994 US sociologist Erich Goode and Israeli academic Those seen as blameworthy Nachman Ben-Yehuda develop become scapegoats, or what Cohen Cohen\u2019s ideas in their book terms \u201cfolk devils,\u201d for problems Moral Panics: The Social that often lie with the state; moral Construction of Deviance. See also: Harold Gar\ufb01nkel 50\u201351 \u25a0 Edward Said 80\u201381 \u25a0 Herbert Marcuse 182\u201387 \u25a0 Stuart Hall 200\u201301 \u25a0 Howard S. Becker 280\u201385","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 291 THE TIME OF THE TRIBES MICHEL MAFFESOLI (1944\u2013 ) IN CONTEXT W e live in \u201cthe time of The metaphor of the tribe... the tribes,\u201d according allows us to account for... the FOCUS to French sociologist role... each person... is called Neo-tribalism Michel Maffesoli. In a world of rapid upon to play within the tribe. change, characterized by risk and KEY DATES unpredictability, individuals need Michel Maffesoli 1887 Ferdinand T\u00f6nnies new ways to \ufb01nd meaning in their identi\ufb01es an important shift in lives. New collectives, or tribes, institutions and ties, these new social ties from Gemeinschaft have emerged, says Maffesoli: forms of belonging and community (community) to Gesellschaft they are dynamic, \ufb02eeting, and are actively achieved, rather than (society). \u201cDionysiac\u201d (after the Greek god being something one is born into. Dionysus: sensual, spontaneous). 1970s and 1980s Building A shared social experience, or Maffesoli sees the modern-day on the work of US sociologist collective aesthetic sensibility, tribes as short-lived, \ufb02exible, and Robert Merton, subcultural is far more important to the \ufb02uid rather than \ufb01xed, so a person theorists argue that youths tribes than individuality, and the can move between different form ties based on class repetition of shared rituals is a way groupings in everyday life and and gender. of forging strong group solidarity. achieve a ful\ufb01lling plural existence. Tribal membership, says Maffesoli, 1988 French sociologist The rave movement of the 1980s must be worked at and requires a Michel Maffesoli\u2019s The and early 1990s, featuring \u201craves\u201d shared belief or consciousness to Time of Tribes: The Decline (parties with rhythmic music maintain coherence. \u25a0 of Individualism in Mass and a speci\ufb01c dance style), Society is published. was characterized less by a common identity than a shared 1998 British sociologist consciousness (love of rave music Kevin Hetherington expands and dance). Not as \ufb01xed as class- Maffesoli\u2019s concept and argues based subcultures such as punk, that neo-tribes, a reaction the movement exempli\ufb01es the to the fragmentation of tribal forms of solidarity described postmodern society, are by Maffesoli. Unlike traditional communities of feeling. See also: Ferdinand T\u00f6nnies 32\u201333 \u25a0 Pierre Bourdieu 76\u201379 \u25a0 Zygmunt Bauman 136\u201343 \u25a0 Benedict Anderson 202\u201303","292 HOW WORKING-CLASS KIDS GET WORKING- CLASS JOBS PAUL WILLIS (1950\u2013 ) IN CONTEXT Working-class counter-school culture rejects middle-class values. FOCUS Cultural reproduction Formal academic Practical jobs and education knowledge is derided are believed to be KEY DATES as feminine. masculine. 1971 In\ufb02uential research by British sociologist Basil These beliefs are useful on the factory Bernstein suggests that \ufb02oor and in other low-paid work. working-class children are disadvantaged in the Working-class kids education system. get working-class jobs. 1976 US academics Samuel A repeated claim is that Following 12 boys, or \u201clads\u201d as he Bowles and Herbert Gintis society is meritocratic: refers to them, in their \ufb01nal two suggest that schools are people can achieve to years of school and \ufb01rst year of institutions that teach people the level of their ability. But Paul employment, Willis claims it is the their place in society. Willis, in his study of working-class culture and values surrounding youths in an industrial town in these young men that inform 1979 British journalist Paul England in the 1970s, asks why it their life choices. They develop Corrigan\u2019s Schooling the is, then, that working-class boys a counterculture that resists the Smash Street Kids argues end up in working-class jobs. philosophy of school, namely that that working-class boys reject middle-class understandings of success through hard work. 1994 A study by British sociologist M\u00e1irt\u00edn Mac an Ghaill, The Making of Men, re\ufb02ects some of Paul Willis\u2019s \ufb01ndings, showing how \u201cmacho lads\u201d react against school.","THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS 293 See also: Michel Foucault 52\u201355 \u25a0 Friedrich Engels 66\u201367 \u25a0 Pierre Bourdieu 76\u201379 \u25a0 R.W. Connell 88\u201389 \u25a0 Stuart Hall 200\u201301 \u25a0 Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis 288\u201389 academic hard work will lead to Willis says that this is not simply The \ufb01erce opposition to school progress. Through language, dress, an example of Friedrich Engels\u2019 exhibited by working-class boys in the and practices such as smoking \u201cfalse consciousness,\u201d whereby the UK is evident, according to Willis, in and drinking, they make clear their dominant ideology is imposed from their \u201cstruggle to win symbolic and rejection of middle-class ideals, and above. Instead, ideas about class, physical space from its rules.\u201d instead emphasize their belief in gender, and ethnicity also emerge practical skills and life experience, from within their culture; they are work in childcare ended up in developing what Willis sees as a very aware that they would have training programs for care of the chauvinistic or patriarchal attitude. to sacri\ufb01ce their class identity elderly. Another study focused to move up the social ladder. on girls who wanted to enter School\u2019s out Their teachers often have low the gender-stereotyped world of The boys see academic knowledge expectations of the boys, leading fashion. These aspirations con\ufb01rm, as \u201cfeminine,\u201d and pupils who them to gradually give up on the says Bates, that working-class aspire to achieve\u2014the \u201cear\u2019oles\u201d idea of teaching them. Schools thus girls have limited horizons. Overall, (conformists)\u2014as \u201csissies\u201d and play a crucial role in reproducing Bates suggests that a constrained inferior. Factory work and similar cultural values, economic divisions, labor market, few quali\ufb01cations, employment is viewed, says Willis, and working-class trajectories. and socialization into \u201cchoosing\u201d as suitably masculine. Many gendered jobs means there is little of the boys work part-time, for New questions evidence of social mobility. \u25a0 example as shelf-stackers or key- Willis\u2019s work has been criticized, cutters, and learn the value of and for example, by British sociologists ethnographical studies of culture connected to such work. David Blackledge and Barry Hunt, culture; in 2000 he cofounded for being based on insuf\ufb01cient the journal Ethnography. Having Their attitudes to girls are sampling. But in the 1990s British been a professor of social and exploitative and hypocritical sociologist Inge Bates reframed cultural ethnography at Keele (\u201csexy\u201d girls are desired but also Willis\u2019s question to ask why University, he is now a professor become \ufb01gures of contempt), and working-class girls end up in the sociology department of are based, Willis claims, on a belief with working-class and gender- Princeton University. in the gendered division of labor. stereotyped jobs. One of her studies Another challenging aspect of their showed that girls who wanted to Key works culture is racism, which serves to distinguish their white, working- Paul Willis 1977 Learning to Labour: How class group identity. The factory or Working Class Kids Get Working shop-\ufb02oor culture mirrors the boys\u2019 A cultural theorist, sociologist, Class Jobs experiences in school\u2014with a and ethnographer, Paul Willis 1978 Profane Culture stress in both places on having a was born in Wolverhampton, 2000 The Ethnographic laugh and resisting too much work. UK. After graduating from the Imagination University of Cambridge with Factory fodder? a degree in literary criticism, Willis argues that, in effect, the he studied for his PhD at the boys\u2019 \u201cperformance\u201d of working- Centre for Contemporary class masculinity supports both Cultural Studies at the patriarchy and\u2014crucially, from a University of Birmingham. Marxist perspective\u2014capitalism by providing the low-paid (male) From 1989 to 1990, Willis workforce. The lads, however, was a member of the Youth experience their employment as Policy Working Group for the a matter of their own free choice Labour Party. Much of his rather than as exploitation. recent work has focused on","FAMILIES INTIMACI","AND ES","296 INTRODUCTION Ann Oakley\u2019s The Adrienne Rich\u2019s essay Sociology of Housework \u201cCompulsory Heterosexuality Margaret Mead\u2019s describes how women cross-cultural studies and Lesbian Existence\u201d challenge traditional are alienated by describes the oppression of domestic work. women in a society where Western concepts of gender roles and heterosexuality is considered the norm. sexuality. 1930S AND 40S 1974 1980 1955 1976 1984 In Family, Socialization, and Michel Foucault publishes Christine Delphy examines Interaction Process, Talcott Parsons the \ufb01rst volume of The the role of capitalism in argues that the family serves the History of Sexuality, which women\u2019s treatment as social function of instilling the examines the power second-class citizens in Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis cultural rules of society relations that regulate into children. social norms. of Women\u2019s Oppression. F or many years, sociologists and wider society. This area of function of the family unit\u2014to offer had used scienti\ufb01c methods study progressed to examine a framework in which they can to study institutions and interpersonal relationships and develop stable relationships. the structure of society as a whole. how they are shaped by society. However, the middle of the 20th Others were more critical of century saw a shift in emphasis Family roles the conventional notions of family. toward understanding the social Among the \ufb01rst sociologists to Traditionally, families re\ufb02ected the actions of individuals\u2014a study of examine the family in this way norms of wider society\u2014patriarchal reasons and meanings rather than was US scholar Talcott Parsons, in their structure, with a male quantities and correlations. This who combined the interpretive breadwinner and a female child- came to be known to sociologists approach of German social theorist carer and houseworker. But as the interpretative approach. Max Weber with the concept of attitudes changed rapidly after functionalism. For Parsons, the World War II. The idea of the stay- From the 1950s, the scope of family is one of the \u201cbuilding at-home mother was increasingly this interpretive method widened blocks\u201d of society, and has a regarded as a form of oppression, slightly to include the study of speci\ufb01c function in the working and feminist sociologists such as families, which could perhaps be of society as a whole. Its primary Ann Oakley and Christine Delphy seen as a social unit somewhere function, he argued, was to provide described the alienation that these between the individual and an environment in which children women experienced. institutions. As such, it was can be prepared for roles they will possible to identify not only the later play in society, by instilling Gender roles within the family relationships between individuals in them its rules and social norms. and, by extension, within society and their families, but also the Adults too bene\ufb01t from another as a whole, began to be challenged, connections between families as did the idea that there is such a thing as a \u201ctypical\u201d or \u201cnormal\u201d","Jeffrey Weeks suggests Judith Stacey\u2019s research FAMILIES AND INTIMACIES 297 in Sex, Politics, and presents radical Steven Seidman rejects Society that sexuality alternatives to the the idea of \u201cnormal\u201d is as much socially conventional Western behavior and sexual constructed as it is identity in Difference understanding of Troubles: Queering Social biologically determined. a stereotypical Theory and Sexual Politics. \u201cnormal\u201d family. 1989 1990S 1997 1990 1995 Judith Butler pioneers queer Ulrich Beck and Elisabeth theory by challenging Beck-Gernsheim examine the problems of maintaining traditional notions of stable sexual and gender identity close relationships in in Gender Trouble: Feminism modern society in The and the Subversion of Identity. Normal Chaos of Love. family. As a result of the decline study of gender roles and sexuality of challenging the sexual norms of the traditional patriarchal family in various cultures around the imposed by society, and his ideas model, the con\ufb02icting pressures world, showing that ideas of paved the way for the sociological of home and work now affect both sexual behavior are more a social study of sexuality itself. partners in many couples, putting construction than a biological fact. a strain on their relationship. The In the West, despite increasing In the 1980s, Jeffrey Weeks nature of families, according to secularization, religious morality applied the idea of sexual norms Judith Stacey, is continually continued to in\ufb02uence the social as a social construct to his study changing to meet the demands norms of heterosexual relationships of sexuality, and speci\ufb01cally of the modern world and also within marriage. homosexuality, while Christine responding to and shaping social Delphy described the experiences norms, so that, for example, single- Attitudes toward relationships of lesbians in a predominantly parent families and same-sex changed greatly during the 1960s. heterosexual society. Perhaps the couples are no longer considered An anti-establishment youth most in\ufb02uential sociologist in this unusual in Western societies. culture helped break taboos \ufb01eld of study, however, is Judith surrounding sex, advocating Butler, who advocated challenging Interpersonal relationships hedonistic free love and a relaxed not only notions of sexuality, but The more liberal attitude toward view of homosexuality. This change the entire concept of gender and sexual relationships and sexuality in culture was echoed by the gender identity too, opening up in the West was, however, slow academic work of French scholar a new, and radical, \ufb01eld of study in coming. In the 1930s and 1940s, Michel Foucault and others. now known as queer theory, which the anthropologist Margaret Mead calls into question conventional helped to pave the way with her Foucault believed that the ideas of what constitutes normal new openness toward intimate sexual behavior. \u25a0 relationships of all kinds was a way","298 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE SEXES ARE CULTURAL CREATIONS MARGARET MEAD (1901\u20131978) IN CONTEXT Men and women learn their gender roles through systems of reward and punishment... FOCUS Variation in gender roles ...but de\ufb01nitions of \u201cnatural\u201d tendencies of men and women across different cultures vary from culture to culture. KEY DATES Women need not be Men need not be 1920 Women in the US nurturers of children. the dominant sex. are given the right to vote. Differences between the sexes 1939\u201345 Women in the are cultural creations. UK and subsequently in the US prove themselves capable I n early 20th-century US gender is not based on biological of doing \u201cmen\u2019s work\u201d during society, a man\u2019s role was to differences between the sexes, World War II; factory worker provide for his family, while but rather re\ufb02ects the cultural Rosie the Riveter becomes a women were relegated to the conditioning of different societies. US icon of female capability private sphere and considered and economic potential. responsible for childcare and Mead\u2019s investigations of the housework because they were intimate lives of non-Western 1972 British sociologist Ann thought to be naturally more peoples in the 1930s and 1940s Oakley argues in Sex, Gender, inclined to such roles. Margaret crystallized her criticisms of her and Society that gender is Mead, however, believed that own society: she claimed that a matter of culture. the ways in which US society 1975 In her article \u201cThe Traf\ufb01c in Women: Notes on the \u2018Political Economy\u2019 of Sex,\u201d US cultural anthropologist Gayle Rubin argues that heterosexual family arrangements give men power and oppress women.","FAMILIES AND INTIMACIES 299 See also: Judith Butler 56\u201361 \u25a0 R.W. Connell 88\u201389 \u25a0 Talcott Parsons 300\u201301 \u25a0 Ann Oakley 318\u201319 \u25a0 Jeffrey Weeks 324\u201325 expressed gender and sexuality another, leads Mead to argue that Gender roles are cultural creations, restricted possibilities for both temperamental attitudes can no according to Mead. There is no men and women. Mead claims longer be regarded as sex-linked. evidence that women are naturally that men and women are punished better than men at doing the and rewarded to encourage gender Her theory that gender roles housework or caring for children. conformity, and what is viewed as are not natural but are created by masculine is also seen as superior. society established gender as a therefore challenge, the ways in critical concept; it allows us to see which social structures such as the Comparing cultures the historical and cross-cultural law, marriage, and the media Mead takes a comparative ways in which masculinity, encourage stereotyped ways of approach to gender in her studies femininity, and sexuality are conducting our intimate lives. of three tribes in New Guinea. Her ideologically constructed. \ufb01ndings challenge conventional In comparison to the early 20th Western ideas about how human Change can happen century, gender roles for both men behavior is determined. Arapesh Mead\u2019s work laid the foundations and women in the 21st century men and women were \u201cgentle, for the women\u2019s liberation have become far less restrictive, responsive, and cooperative\u201d and movement and informed the with women participating more both undertook childcare\u2014traits so-called \u201csexual revolution\u201d of the in the public sphere. \u25a0 the West would see as \u201cfeminine.\u201d 1960s onward. Her ideas posed a fundamental challenge to society\u2019s Similarly, it was the norm for rigid understandings of gender Mundugumor women to behave roles and sexuality. in a \u201cmasculine\u201d way by being as violent and aggressive as the Following on from Mead, men. And in a further reversal of feminists such as US cultural traditional Western roles, women in anthropologist Gayle Rubin Tchambuli society were dominant, argued that if gender, unlike while men were seen as dependent. sex, is a social construction, there is no reason why women should The fact that behaviors coded continue to be treated unequally. as masculine in one society Viewing gender as culturally may be regarded as feminine in determined allows us to see, and Margaret Mead Margaret Mead was born in became a popular \ufb01gure, Philadelphia in 1901. Her father lecturing widely on key social was a professor of \ufb01nance; her issues such as women\u2019s rights, mother was a sociologist; she sexual behavior, and the family. herself became curator emeritus Mead was the author of more of the American Museum of than 20 books, many of which Natural History, New York. were part of her mission to make anthropology more Mead received her PhD from accessible to the public. She Columbia University in 1929, and died in New York in 1978. went on to become a leading cultural anthropologist, best Key works known for her studies of the people of Oceania. Her early work 1928 Coming of Age in Samoa on gender and sexuality was 1935 Sex and Temperament labeled as scandalous and she in Three Primitive Societies was denounced as a \u201cdirty old 1949 Male and Female woman.\u201d She nevertheless"]