10077315-DEA-XX-XX-RP-A-RP.2 Stage 3 Report

Stage 3 Report Solent University Warsash Safety Training Centre Developed Design 10077315-DEA-XX-XX-RP-A-RP.2 Stage 3 Report Date: Revision: By: Checked: 22.03.19 00 JJ DG 1 190322 Stage 3 Report-1.pages ISO 9001 Version 3 Date: 12 February 2016

The Project The Team Project Manager 3D Axonometric Views: Consultant Team: Cost Consultant View 1 - Towards Safety Training Building and HUET Entrance Principal Designer View 2 - Towards Fire Building Entrance M&E Engineer Structural Engineer BREEAM + Acoustics Planning Consultant BIM Manager Building Control 2

The Process Executive Summary RIBA Work Stage: This document collates the RIBA Stage 3 architectural Planning: Warsash Safety Training Centre information for the Warsash Safety Training Centre. The Centre is being developed for Solent University with the principal BREEAM: Background to the proposals All other buildings will be retained and repurposed. stakeholders being the Warsash Maritime Academy and BIM: The Nigel Gee building will be used as staff offices. The Hampshire Fire and Rescue. The campus existing classrooms and training facilities, Waterside Building will continue to provide boat storage including the fire ground, are approaching their end of life and maintenance facilities. It will in the future also house the This document forms part of the overall Stage 3 report being and require substantial reinvestment. Warsash Sea Cadets. compiled by Faithful + Gould. As such this document should not be read in isolation and instead should be read alongside Furthermore, the University does not have its own survival The fire changing building will continue to support fire those reports prepared by the other members of the consultant pool facility for undertaking controlled training exercises ground training activities. The small and unconventionally team. The document includes the agreed deliverables for this including Helicopter Underwater Escape Training (HUET). shaped existing fire school building will initially be work stage and these are detailed on page 8. In addition to the Currently an external swimming pool is used requiring the decommissioned, but we envisage adapting it to support agreed deliverables this document contains some benchmark transfer of delegates and equipment by road on a daily future fire ground training exercises. material related to specific aspects of the project. basis. Access to the site will remain as the existing main entrance Extensive consultation and numerous meetings have taken Of the 9 buildings on the retained site, 4 are prefabricated via Newtown Road. The secondary access to the north will place up to this point, both during this work stage and previous and temporary and therefore not suitable for remain closed and only available for emergency vehicles. to it and these are summarised on page 9. The consultant team redevelopment. are detailed opposite. During this stage preparations for the This proposal consolidates all teaching and training submission of a detailed planning application have been made. Of the remaining buildings only the John Thorneycroft facilities into a new integrated L shaped building within a Public consultation took place on Wednesday the 6th and workshop will be demolished. It was constructed in the remodelled campus. Thursday 7th of March 2019 and included a set of presentation early 1980s and has large expanses of glass with very poor boards and a model. The intention is that the detailed environmental performance. Early studies concluded that it LOCATION PLAN application will be submitted week commencing 25th March would be too expensive and complex to refurbish. 2019. AERIAL OVERVIEW The project has been developed in line with the brief requirements to achieve the Building Research Establishment Public consultation board (above) Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) standard of Very Good. VERY GOOD The proposals have also been developed in accordance with the requirements of the project Building Information Model (BIM) Execution Plan (BEP) for this work stage. This has included the exchange of IFC model data for coordination with the M&E and Structural Engineering consultants. Support has also been provided during this work stage to the project team in the selection of a main contractor for development of the project during the next work stage. The following should also be noted: 1. Reference should be made to the enabling works information issued previously with regards works associated with the new access road and works to the fire ground. 2. Currently the status of the tidal pond is to be determined. There is an option to fill in the pond to assist site logistics as well as future biodiversity improvements; however at present these works are not agreed. The adoption of these measures should therefore not be assumed when commencing Stage 4. 3

4

0.0 _ Contents Page Section Description Page Section Description 7 0.1 Executive Summary 4.0 Outline Specification 8 0.2 Introduction 9 0.3 Stage 3 Deliverables 5.0 SSU Design Guide Consultation - Stakeholder engagement 12 1.0 6.0 Architectural Drawings 13 1.1 Campus Layout & Setting 6.1 Site Plans 14 1.2 WMA Campus - Upper + lower site overview 6.2 GA Plans Information 15 1.3 WMA Campus Setting - Location plan 6.3 Detail Plans 16 1.4 WMA Campus Setting - Site plan existing 6.4 HUET Layouts 17 1.5 WMA Campus - Existing site overview 6.5 GA Sections 19 1.6 WMA Campus Setting - Site plan proposed 6.6 GA Elevations 20 1.7 WMA Campus - Proposed site overview 6.7 Component Drawings 21 1.8 WMA Campus Setting - Model view of the proposal 6.8 Details 1.9 WMA Campus Setting - North view 6.9 Fire Strategy 24 WMA Campus Setting - West view 6.10 External Works 25 2.0 6.11 Schedules 26 2.1 Building Typology 6.12 Visualisations 27 2.2 Building Typology - Access requirements 29 2.3 Building Typology - Functional requirements 7.0 Designer’s Risk Assessments 2.4 Building Typology - Functional requirements 33 2.5 Building Typology - Maritime precedents 8.0 Access & Maintenance Strategy 35 Building Typology - 3D form and massing 36 3.0 37 3.1 Specification Benchmarking 38 3.2 External Envelope - Materials 39 3.3 Design Engine Benchmark Projects 41 3.4 External Envelope - Rainscreen cladding 42 3.5 External Envelope - Concrete plinth 43 3.6 External Envelope - Solar shading 44 3.7 External Envelope - End bay detail 45 3.8 Interior - Doors 47 3.9 Interior - Services 49 3.10 Interior - Ceiling systems 3.11 Interior - Joinery (servery) 3.12 Interior - HUET 3.13 Interior - 3D plans Externals - Boundary treatment 5

6

0.1 _ Introduction The campus existing classrooms and training facilities, including the fire ground, are approaching their end of life and require substantial reinvestment. Furthermore, the University does not have its own survival pool facility for undertaking controlled training exercises including Helicopter Underwater Escape Training (HUET). Currently an external swimming pool is used requiring the transfer of delegates and equipment by road on a daily basis. Of the 9 buildings on the retained site, 4 are prefabricated and temporary and therefore not suitable for redevelopment. Of the remaining buildings only the John Thorneycroft workshop will be demolished. It was constructed in the early 1980s and has large expanses of glass with very poor environmental performance. Early studies concluded that it would be too expensive and complex to refurbish. All other buildings will be retained and repurposed. The Nigel Gee building will be used as staff offices. The Waterside Building will continue to provide boat storage and maintenance facilities. It will in the future also house the Warsash Sea Cadets. The fire changing building will continue to support fire ground training activities. The small and unconventionally shaped existing fire school building will initially be decommissioned, but we envisage adapting it to support future fire ground training exercises. Access to the site will remain as the existing main entrance via Newtown Road. The secondary access to the north will remain closed and only available for emergency vehicles. This proposal consolidates all teaching and training facilities into a new integrated L shaped building within a remodelled campus. View from the West 7

0.2 _ Stage 3 Deliverables Information to be issued by Design Engine: For Reference we have provided details of the agreed • IFC Model deliverables for this RIBA Work Stage. • Site Plans (1:500) • Area Plans (1:100) • Reference Plans (1:200) • GA Plans (1:100) • Reflected Ceiling Plans (1:100) • Wall Types Plans (1:100) • Floor Finishes Plans (1:100) • Fire Strategy Plans (1:100) • Acoustic Strategy Plans (1:100) • Bird Protection Location Plans (1:100) • GA Sections (1:100) • GA Elevations (1:100) • Internal Door Elevations (1:20) • Plan Details of Key Junctions (1:5) • Sections Details of Key Junctions (1:5) • GA sections of key areas (1:25) • Component drawing of typical internal stair/handrail (1:10) • Component drawing of typical external railing/handrail (1:10) • External works drawings of west boundary wall (1:200/1:20) • CDM Designers Hazard assessment • CDM Access and maintenance strategy • Outline Specification • Internal door list schedule • Servery Kitchen Plan (1:50) • Huet Plan (1:50) • GF Changing Village/Staff Changing Plan (1:50) • GF Changing Village A/B Plan (1:50) • FF Changing Village/Staff Changing Plan (1:50) • Typical Disabled WC Plan (1:25) • Typical WC Plan (1:25) • Typical Shower Cubicle Plan (1:25) • COBie Schema including Contact, Facility, Floor and Space Data. 8

We have detailed here all the workshops and consultation 0.3 _ Consultation - Stakeholder engagement meetings that have occurred during Stage 3. Meetings during RIBA Stage 3 1. 29th November 2018: Structures workshop 2. 4th December 2018: MEP workshop 3. 4th December 2018: Design progress meeting 4. 11th December 2018: Review of catering proposals 5. 13th December 2018: Structures workshop 6. 13th December 2018: Fire ground design workshop 7. 18th December 2018: Design progress meeting 8. 8th January 2019: BREEAM workshop 9. 11th January 2019: Catering workshop 10. 11th January 2019: Workshop - upper & lower site separation 11. 15th January 2019: Workshop - HUET/Pool requirements 12. 15th January 2019: Design progress meeting 13. 16th January 2019: Workshop - waterside & Nigel Gee refurbishment 14. 16th January 2019: Workshop - Operational requirements 15. 16th January 2019: Workshop - IT/AV 16. 29th January 2019: Workshop - Fire strategy 17. 29th January 2019: Design progress meeting 18. 31st January 2019: Pre App meeting 19. 5th February 2019: Structures / M&E coordination meeting 20. 7th February 2019: Minerva meeting 21. 11th February 2019: Workshop - Waterside refurbishment 22. 11th February 2019: Workshop - Cleaning requirements 23. 12th February 2019: Design progress meeting 24. 26th February 2019: Design progress meeting 25. 12th March 2019: Design progress meeting 26. 12th March 2019: Coordination meeting 27. 15th March 2019: CDM meeting A series of workshops and presentations occurred during the scope review and Stage 2 process that have informed the work during Stage 3 design: • Initial Stakeholder workshops with WMA team. • Interim Design review with WMA team. • Survival Systems Group visit to SU re HUET • Operational Requirements - Workshop • Fire Building plans update - Workshop. • Fire Strategy - Workshop • Materials - Workshop • Maintenance, Cleaning, Lift, - Workshop • Environmental Workshop • ICT/AV - Workshop • SEFtec Presentation to SU Team • Safety Training team meeting ,HFRS • BIM - Workshop • BREEAM - Workshop • Project Launch presentation • Presentation to end user teams WMA. 9

10

1.0 _ Campus Layout & Setting 11

1.1 _ WMA Campus - Upper + lower site overview 12

n. 1.2 _ WMA Campus Setting - Location plan Project Location The proposed new Warsash Safety Training Centre is to be located on Solent University’s existing Lower Site. Thus consolidating teaching spaces from the upper and lower site as well as providing ‘in-house HUET’ training facilities which are currently conducted off site. The proposal will also accommodate the teaching and training requirements of Hampshire Fire & Rescue as part of a shared- facility collaboration. Access to the site is maintained via the existing driveway off Newtown Road. 13

1.3 _ WMA Campus Setting - Site plan existing n. 14

11. 1.4 _ WMA Campus - Existing site overview 4. 8. 1. 5. 6. 12. 13. 3. 7. 8. 8. 2. 14. 10. 9. Key - Lower site 1. John Thorneycroft (ex workshops) 2. Waterside Building and boathouse 3. Teaching (Lovat house) 4. Teaching (Drummond House) 5. Nigel Gee (Safety Training Staff) 6. Estates building 7. Fire school Buildings 8. Parking 9. Pier 10. Boat compound 11. North east access 12. Lower Site entrance 13. Tidal pond 14. Electrical sub station 15

1.5 _ WMA Campus Setting - Site plan proposed n. 16

1.6 _ WMA Campus - Proposed site overview 13. 2. 3. 15. 1. 4. 14. 9. 11. 5. 12. 6. 1. 12. 7. 10. 9. 8. Key - Lower site 1. Waterside Building and boathouse 2. Nigel Gee (Reception + admin) 3. New Safety Training Building and HUET 4. Covered entrance 5. Pedestrian zone around tidal pond 6. New Fire Building 7. Existing Fire Building 8. Fire ground 9. Parking 10. Pier 11. Boat compound 12. Tidal pond 13. North east access 14. Lower Site entrance 15. Pedestrian footpath + access route 17

18

1.7 _ WMA Campus Setting - Model views of the proposal 19

1.8 _ WMA Campus Setting - North view New Safety Training Building and HUET New Fire Building 20

1.9 _ WMA Campus Setting - West view New Safety Training Building and HUET New Fire Building 21

22

2.0 _ Building Typology 23

2.1 _ Building Typology - Access requirements To main car park DrNiveewwtaoywton Road Form and function and access To main car park Cafe Security Vehicular access is via the existing drive off Newtown Road and Pond through to the consolidated car park at the north of the site, Fire Ground behind the Safety Training Building (ST). Secondary traffic To point requiring access to the Fire Ground would continue west, down the existing road via boom gates. This allows a shared To Fire Ground access zone in front of the wing which primarily is used for fire training. Pedestrian access from the main car park is via dedicated pathways and ramps to the north entrance of the building and via a pedestrian path around the pond to the shared entrance node where the two wings intersect. Existing walk ways to the building via Newtown Road are being maintained. n. Main Vehicular Route Secondary Vehicular Route / Specialist Traffic Boom gate Main Pedestrian Route Secondary Pedestrian Access between wings Entrance Points Pedestrian Zone Shared Zone 24

2.2 _ Building Typology - Functional requirements Form and function The two-winged building typology fulfils the requirements for a new Safety Training Centre which encompasses the many facets of the Solent University’s teaching offerings, but also the varied and expanding services from the Warsash Maritime Academy and the growth of Hampshire Fire and Rescue’s training programs. Cafe Water and Medical Pond Safety Training Water Safety and HUET Training Fire Training n. Entrance, communal and amenity provisions Classrooms Water Safety and HUET Training Office, meeting and administrative 25

2.3 _ Building Typology - Functional requirements Form and function With this project, building typology and form is directly driven by its very specialist functions. The Safety Training building houses the HUET (Helicopter Underwater Escape Trainer). Typically these are housed within portal frame sheds that provide a clear span over the pool, but also a sufficient lifting beam location at ridge level. For this project it makes sense to adopt a portal frame solution for the structure and section, then extrude this section as a series of bays to accommodate the remaining elements of the brief (teaching, catering and admin facilities). Within this framed structure we are able to keep the footprint of the building compact and efficient, by reducing circulation distances to a minimum. The portal framed bays also allow for an expedient and sequential construction where elements could be phased to suit funding restrictions. A similar principle could be adopted for the Fire Safety building so that both buildings have a sibling relationship. 26

2.4 _ Building Typology - Maritime precedents Architectural language Coastal and dockyard architecture often inherits its form from its functional and transient nature. Typically buildings are required to accommodate boats and equipment with easy access to slipways. Therefore they tend to take the form of wide span sheds with deep extruded sections. Lightweight industrial materials are often used but are specified and detailed to suit a harsh marine and saline environment. To navigate through the planning process its important that we create a strong narrative behind the design of the buildings, that is appropriate for the typology but also the site. There is a strong parity between the functional internal requirements of the HUET and the typology of coastal, dockyard architecture. Both suit a “shed” aesthetic with a gabled section and extruded plan. At this preliminary stage we have adopted these principles for the typology and form of the two new buildings. At this stage and in anticipation of the Pre Application meeting with the local authority, we suggest that darker colours are selected that will be visually recessive. Signature colour highlights could be introduced associated with branding and signage. 27

View 1 - Towards Safety Training Building Key (Views 1 & 2) and HUET Entrance 1. Entrance 5 2. External terrace with architectural 7 9 10 guarding 16 8 3. Canopy over terrace 4. Sinusoidal rainscreen cladding 4 5. Sinusoidal roof covering 6. Coloured metal linings 7. Photovoltaic array 8. Rooflight 9. Solar shading 10. Fume cupboard chimney 11. Natural vent chimney 12. Covered terrace 13. External screening to staircase to match facade cladding 14. Pre-cast concrete plinth 15. Industrial access door 16. Flush continuous linear external grilles 11 8 93 9 14 5 1 6 12 13 2 28

2.5 _ Building Typology - 3D form and massing View 2 - Towards Fire Building Entrance 8 11 10 8 7 4 3 9 5 9 1 2 16 4 14 15 29

30

3.0 _ Specification Benchmarking NOTES: This section of the report should be read alongside the Outline Specification (Section 4.0) and the Solent University Design Guide (Section 5.0). The benchmarking is intended to illustrate the broad specification of the scheme. Exterior materials would need to be robust and suitable for a marine saline environment. Lightweight sheet materials will suit the building, typology, environment and speed of construction. Having adopted a portal frame solution, our approach is to expose the primary and secondary steel structure within the building interior, including diagonal cross bracing. Ceiling finishes and linings to exterior walls are only to be included where necessary for hygiene or acoustic reasons. Elsewhere the internal face of exterior lining trays/panels will be left unfinished. 31

Sinusoidal cladding Trespa type panel Sinusoidal cladding Wall Cladding (High-Level) Sinusoidal profiled sheets will be used for high-level cladding. This will Red Trespa type cladding will be used for Dark coloured sinusoidal cladding will be used to We have chosen both sinusoidal cladding and Trespa type be coated to resist the marine environment and provide a service life of cladding feature colour panels and solar the roof to match the cladding used to high-level cladding to use at high-level. 30-40 years. shading fins walls All options need to suitable for a saline marine environment. The steel sinusoidal profile will be a dark recessive colour Colour highlights will be provided with Trespa type material used for wall sections and for solar shading fins. Roof Cladding We have chosen to use sinusoidal cladding to the roof which will be matched to the high-level wall cladding in both colour and profile. As with the wall cladding it will need to suitable for a saline marine environment. 32

Window system 3.1 _ External Envelope - Materials Examples of top-hung composite thermally broken windows. Windows For this project we are considering a proprietary window system. Ideally we would adopt a fully reversible window to allow cleaning from the building interior to reduce future maintenance costs. The windows will be a dark recessive colour to match the surrounding sinusoidal cladding. Allowances for interior roller blinds will be provided to all teaching spaces in order to reduce glare. 33

Performing Arts Building John Payne Building University Centre Photography Building The University of Winchester Oxford Brookes University The University of Winchester Arts University Bournemouth Main Contractor: Osborne Main Contractor: N/A (Management Contract) Main Contractor: Osborne Main Contractor: Morgan Sindall Winchester Oxford Winchester 34 Poole

Abercrombie Building Student Services Building 3.2 _ Design Engine Benchmark Projects Oxford Brookes University Arts University Bournemouth Over the next 8 pages we have highlighted some key apsects of the design and illustrated the design intent by reference to Main Contractor: Laing O’Rourke Main Contractor: Morgan Sindall project precedents. These benchmark projects are noted here with key data and location so they can be visited if necessary. It should be noted that each project is a benchmark for a particular element(s) and NOT as an overall benchmark Oxford Poole 35

3.3 _ External Envelope - Rainscreen cladding Key visual requirements: • Concealed gutters and rainwater downpipes • Minimal flashing details to create a crisp aesthetic, notably at all openings, corners, eaves and ridge locations as design intent precedent Elevation key Design intent precedent: Performing Arts Building - University of Winchester Precedent photographs A A powder coated pressed 140 mm medium dense paint grade max 30 metal corner profile blockwork (7N/mm2) - F10/250 powder coated pressed metal corner profile 12 mm external support bracket (Eurofox) to span 360 ply mm support angle H31 vertical support fixing bracket H31 rail max 30 bracket and horizontal rail for secret fixing 01 max 30 max 30 acoustic wall ties to S.E's insulation details acoustic vapour control membrane seal bracket and horizontal rail for secret steel column to S.E's detail fixing 140 mm medium dense paint grade acoustic blockwork (7N/mm2) - F10/250 seal vapour control membrane metal frame to S.E'd detail to support trespa cladding vertical sinusoidal metal cladding H31/120 06 (Euroclad - colour: matt anthracite) 13 mm trespa cladding (mechanically secret fixed) 13 mm trespa cladding (mechanically secret fixed) Reference should be made to metal frame to S.E'd detail to support drawing 1731-5101 for an trespa cladding annotated version of this section Part elevation Precedent detail Sketch section through the facade 36 1 TYPICAL EXTERNAL WALL CORNER DETAIL 2 TYPICAL EXTERNAL WALL CORNER DETAIL GROUND FLOOR PLAN DETAIL FIRST FLOOR PLAN DETAIL

Elevation key Design intent precedent: 3.4 _ External Envelope - Concrete plinth Part elevation Abercrombie Building - Oxford Brookes University Wall Cladding (low-level flood zone) Our elevations have been arranged to provide resilience to flooding up to a datum of 2m above grade. We are proposing an in-situ concrete plinth up to a level 1m above grade to match the level of the existing Nigel Gee building. This provides the podium/terrace area to gain entry to the new buildings accessed via steps and ramps. To provide a robust surface to the lower part of the exterior elevations we are proposing a pre-cast concrete panel finish. Precedent photographs Pre-cast concrete Note 8mm x 8mm chamfers to all edges Low-level wall cladding RWP detail In-situ concrete Recessed with cover plate flush with plinth Plinths, access ramps and steps. 37

3.5 _ External Envelope - Solar shading Key visual requirements: • Projecting Trespa solar shading panels to adopt concealed fixings with a recessed frame as the design intent precedent • External services to be integrated to avoid surface mounted fixings which if exposed could deteriorate in the exposed marine environment Elevation key Design intent precedent: Performing Arts Building - University of Winchester NOTE: The contractor is responsible for the checking of all site dimensions and levels. These should be checked prior to ordering of any components and before commencement of the works on site. All discrepancies should be brought to the immediate attention of the Contract Administrator. KEY: Precedent photographs A A powder coated pressed 140 mm medium dense paint grade max 30 metal corner profile blockwork (7N/mm2) - F10/250 powder coated pressed metal corner profile 12 mm external support bracket (Eurofox) to span 360 ply mm support angle H31 vertical support fixing bracket H31 rail max 30 bracket and horizontal rail for secret fixing 01 max 30 9mm plywood sheeting to acoustic max 30 acoustic consultant's details wall ties to S.E's insulation vertical timber support between details 50mm - 200mm acoustic vapour control membrane seal bracket and horizontal rail for secret wall ties to S.E's steel column to S.E's details detail fixing 9mm plywood sheeting on vertical timber support with mineral wool 140 mm medium dense paint grade acoustic insulation between to acoustic blockwork (7N/mm2) - F10/250 seal consultant's details vapour control membrane metal frame to S.E'd detail to support vertical sinusoidal metal cladding trespa cladding H31/120 vertical sinusoidal metal cladding (Euroclad - colour: matt anthracite) H31/120 06 vapour control (Euroclad - colour: matt anthracite) membrane 13 mm trespa cladding (mechanically secret fixed) fixing bracket H31 support angle H31 13 mm trespa cladding (mechanically steel column to S.E's secret fixed) detail Part elevation Reference should be made to metal frame to S.E'd detail to support drawing 1731-5100 for an trespa cladding annotated version of this section Precedent detail Sketch section through the facade 38 00 24.03.09 issued fortender BK DG rev date notes drawn chkd Design Engine Architects Limited 3+4 St Clement Yard Winchester SO23 9DR www.designengine.co.uk 01962 890111 project title date of origin scale Art Faculty Studios March 2009 1:5@A1/:10@A3 TYPICAL EXTERNAL WALL CORNER DETAIL TYPICAL EXTERNAL WALL CORNER DETAIL client drawing title GROUND FLOOR PLAN DETAIL FIRST FLOOR PLAN DETAIL University of Winchester Plan Details-Sheet 2 1 2 status drawing reference revision TENDER 0820-501 00

3.6 _ External Envelope - End bay detail Reference should be made to drawing 1731-5102 for an annotated version of this section Reference should be made to drawing 1731-5102 for an annotated version of this section Part elevation Sketch section through the facade and detail (right) 39

Interior Elements Refer to Section 3.12 for illustrative plans 40

3.7 _ Interior - Doors Key visual requirements: • Split frame detail with full depth stop as design intent precedent • Face of skirtings to be set flush with face of door frame • Vision panels and push plates to align as design intent precedent • Allow for integration of graphic to face of doors as design intent precedent Key section through the Training Centre Design intent precedent: NOTE: The contractor is responsible for the checking of all site dimensions and levels. These should be NOTE: The contractor is responsible for the checking of all site dimensions and levels. These should be Performing Arts Building - University of Winchester checked prior to ordering of any components and before commencement of the works on site. All checked prior to ordering of any components and before commencement of the works on site. All discrepancies should be brought to the immediate attention of the Contract Administrator. discrepancies should be brought to the immediate attention of the Contract Administrator. KEY: KEY: 1. For structural opening sizes and fire & acoustic door 1. For structural opening sizes and fire & acoustic door requirements refer to written schedule 0820-801. requirements refer to written schedule 0820-801. 2. For door details refer to 0820-805 2. For door details refer to 0820-805 3. Ironmongery shown indicatively only- refer to 3v ironmongery 3. Ironmongery shown indicatively only- refer to 3v ironmongery schedules. schedules. 4. Dimensions for doors are frame sizes based on details - for 4. Dimensions for doors are frame sizes based on details - for structural opening width - 10mm, for structural opening height - structural opening width - 10mm, for structural opening height - 5mm, dimensions for internal screens are structural openings from 5mm, dimensions for internal screens are structural openings from blockwork to blockwork or to steelwork. blockwork to blockwork or to steelwork. 5. for NBS specification 5. for NBS specification for doors: 0820-L20/430 for doors: 0820-L20/430 for room number signs: 0820-N14/321 for room number signs: 0820-N14/321 for ironmongery: 0820-P21 for ironmongery: 0820-P21 2400 608 1020 920 1020 920 NOTE: The contractor is responsible for the checking of all site di 2400 608 be checked prior to ordering of any components and before co DOOR TYPE 1B DOOR TYPE 1B DODOROTRYTPYEP1EB1B DODOOR RTYTPYEP1EB1B DODOROTRYTPYEP1EA1B DODOROTRYTPYEP5E 1B DOOR TYDPOE 4OR TYPE 1A DOOR TYPE 6 DOOR TYPE 5 DOOR TYPE 4 All discrepancies should be brought to the immediate attention 2400 608studiosstudiosstustduiodsiosstustduidoisoscosrtruiddoiors- ground floortosilteutd-iogrsound floortoilet - grocunodrrfliodoor r - ground floorcleaner's & plant t-ogirloeutnd- fglorour nd floor toilet - ground floor KEY: 2400 2400 608DOORS:DOORS:DOODORSO: RS:DODOORSO:RS:1370DOODORSO: RS:DOODORSO: RS:DOORS:DOORS:DOORS:DOORS: DOORS: DOOR TYPE 6 2400ID.0.01ID.0.01ID.0ID.0.01.01ID.0ID.0.01.01ID.1ID.0.08.01ID.1ID.0.08.01ID.1.08ID.1.08ID.1.08ID.1.08ID.1.08cleaner's & plant - ground floor ID.0.02 ID.0.02 ID.0ID.0.02.02 ID.0.07 ID.0.07 ID.0ID.0.07.07 ID.0ID.0.02.02 ID.0.02 ID.0.02 DOORS: ID.0.10 ID.0.10 ID.0ID.1.0.10 ID.0ID.0.07.07 ID.0.07 ID.0.07 ID.1.08 ID.1.06 ID.1.06 ID.1ID.0.16.06 ID.0.10 ID.0.10 ID.1.07 ID.1.07 ID.1ID.0.17.07 ID.0ID.1.00.10 ID.1.06 ID.1.06 ID.1ID.0.16.06 ID.1.07 ID.1.07 1370 ID.1ID.0.17.07 150 150 fairfaced concrete block DODOROTRYTPYEP1EA1B costrruiddoiors- first floor flush bolt treated softwood packing 44 15 timber stud to underside of plywood lining K11/415 with fire 150 150 G20/270 7 steel or PC planks retardant treatment as Z12/210 DOODORSO: RS: 150 150 ID.0ID.1.01.01 thick bead mastic seal door frame L20/430 150 treated softwood packing timber vertical studs with acoustic L20/820 12 32 G20/270 insultation in between ID.0.02 concealed door seal ID.0.07 rockwool isowall packed to fire rated or thick bead mastic seal timber ' lintel' / packing ID.0.10 into gap L20/810 acoustic doors only L20/820 ID.1.06 L20/430 door frame L20/430 ID.1.07 palusol fire rated strip - to rockwool isowall packed into gap concealed fire rated doors only L20/430 door leaf L20/430 L20/810 door seal to fire rated + acoustic doors only fairfaced concrete block palusol fire rated strip - to fire rated L20/430 doors only L20/430 150 650 fixed door leaf L20/430 flush bolt 1 DOOR JAMB - EXPOSED BLOCKWORK 2 DOOR HEAD - BEHIND PLYWOOD LINING 482 PLAN DETAIL 1:5 SECTION DETAIL 1:5 888 920 920 920 1020 Precedent photograph 1370 DPOrOeRcTeYPdEe1nt details DOOR TYPE 2 DOOR TYPE 3 DOOR TYPE 4 DOOR TYPE 5 disabled wc DOOR TYPE 1B studios & corridor tech gallery office wc studios DOOR TYPE 3 DOOR TYPE 5 DOOR TYPE 3 DOOR TYPE 1B DODOROTRYTPYEP5E 1B DOOR TYDPOE 4OR TYPE 1A DOOR TYPE 9 DOOR TYPE 4 DOOR TYPE 9 DOORS: studios toilet - first cflooorrridor - first floor DOORS: office & tech galletryoi-lefirstt -flofirostr floor store ID.0.01 tDoOsiOlteRuStd: -ifoirsst floor store DOORS:toilet - first floor office & tech gaDllOeOryRS-: first floor DOORS: ID.0.02 DOORS: ID.1.02 DOORS: ID.0.13 ID.0.07 ID.0.01 ID.0.01 DOORS: ID.1.11 00 25.09.09 issued for Information ID.B0K.14DG ID.0.03 00 25.09.09 issued for Information BK DG ID.0.10 ID.0.02 ID.0.03 ID.0.06 ID.1.09 drawn chkd ID.1.06 ID.0.07 ID.0.02 DOORS: DOORS: ID.0.06 DOORS: rev date notes DOORS: ID.d1raw.1n 0chkd ID.1.04 rev date notes ID.1.07 ID.0.10 DIIDDO..10DIOD..0OR.008SO7.:0R1S: ID.1.08 ID.1.08 ID.1.04 ID.1.08 ID.1.06 ID.0ID..100.02 DOORS: DOORS: ID.1.08 ID.1.07 ID.0ID..101.07 ID.0.11 ID.1.08 00 21.05.09 issued forinformation ID.1ID..006.10 41 rev date notes Design Engine Architects Limited ID.1ID..017.06 Design Engine Architects Limited ID.1ID..018.07 3+4 St Clement Yard Winchester SO23 9DR 3+4 St Clement Yard Winchester SO23 9DR www.designengine.co.uk www.designengine.co.uk 01962 890111 01962 890111 project title date of origin scale project title date of origin scale Art faculty studios September 2009 1:20@A1/1:40@A3 Art faculty studios September 2009 1:20@A1/1:40@A3 client drawing title client drawing title University of Winchester Door graphics University of Winchester Door graphics status drawing reference revision C status drawing reference 00revision 3+4 St C INFORMATION 0820-810 00 INFORMATION 0820-810 project title date of origin Art Faculty Studios May 32000059 client drawing title University of Winchester Internal Doo

3.8 _ Interior - Services Key visual requirements: • Generally surface-fixed services - galvanised finish unless noted otherwise • All visible services to be aligned, plumb and coordinated to avoid length of runs and extent of services. Services to be grouped wherever possible with even spacing following general setting out strategy detailed below • Where necessary coordinated service runs through steel beams to achieve level distribution rather than setting down at each location as design intent precedent Design intent precedent: Key section through the Training Centre John Payne Building - Oxford Brookes University Precedent photograph Precedent details 42

3.9 _ Interior - Ceiling systems Key visual requirements: • All baffles to be set to align with bottom edge of downstand beams with even, regular spacing. Baffles to be coordinated with light fittings and other services as design intent precedent • Acoustic plasterboard ceilings to be installed to ensure services are coordinated with acoustic slot areas with even borders/ margins as design intent precedent • Particular care to be taken with quality of plasterboard installation at rooflight recesses as face will be unforgiving due to natural daylight conditions AB C NOTE: The contractor is responsible for the checking of all site dimensions and levels. These should be checked prior to ordering of any components and before commencement of the works on site. All discrepancies should be brought to the immediate attention of the Contract Administrator. KEY: BAFFLE CEILING SYSTEMSteelbalustrades-EWS-8 Facade bund wall - EWS-3A 1. Do not scale from this drawing. ACOUSTIC PLASTERBOARD CEILING ROOFLIGHTS Glass fin bracket - EWS-8 Curtain walling - EWS-3A 2. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all relevant Glass fin - EWS-8 Aluminium insulated spandrel panel - EWS-3A Architects and Consultants drawings, schedules and specifications. Design intent precedent: Gantry support bracket EWS-8 EPDM - EWS-3A 3. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with the latest revision of University Centre - The University of Winches8ter Steel maintenance gantry - EWS-8 Stone paving slabs on adjustable supports the Architect's Specification Key Reference Schedule: 1216-10000. - FLF-11 EWS-8 Warm flat roof system - RFS-1 Thermally broken fixing - EWS-8 Curtain walling / gantry support bracket - EWS-8 Third Floor Level FFL + 59.600 m EWS-8 EWS-8 EWS-8 Design intent precedent: Design intent preceEdWS-8 ent: 10Student Services BuildingG - Arts University Bournemouth EWS-8 EWS-3A FOR DETAILED NOTES 10 SEE DRAWING 5720 RFS-1 Photography Building - Arts University Bournemouth 9 NOTE: The contractor is responsible for the checking of all site dimensions and levels. T checked prior to ordering of any components and before commencement of the works EPDM - EWS-3A Steel beams to S.E. details discrepancies should be brought to the immediate attention of the Contract Administrato Aluminium insulated spandrel panel - EWS-3A Concrete slab to S.E details KEY: 6mm Aluminium fascia trims - EWS-3A FCL - refer to RCP 1. Do not scale from this drawing. 2. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all re Curtain walling - EWS-3A Architects and Consultants drawings, schedules and 3. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with the la Suspended acoustic baffle - CLG-1 the Architect's Specification Key Reference Schedule Plasterboard lining to floor beams CLG-9 Blind with cable/pot guides - EWS-3A Passivhaus glazed rooflight EWS-4 56.910 15° Upstand level - to suit Level at intersection A B C Aluminium insulated spandrel panel - EWS 3A Blind cable/pot - EWS-3A Passivhaus glazed rooflight - EWS-4 Upstand level - to suit Curtain walling - EWS-3A Parapet level Second Floor Level FFL + 56.200 m EWS-8 EWS-8 Steel and insulation to support floor finish and Parapet level ALIGN 10 provide acoustic separation between floors 110 EWS-8 EWS-8 EWS-8 EWS-8 - EWS-3A All window actuators, ALIGN Glass fin brackets - EWS-8 Thermally broken fixing - EWS-8 associated wiring and Glass fins - EWS-8 Carpet - FLF-2A conduits to be concealed 300 1290 Steel maintenance gantry - EWS-8 Acoustic raised floor - FLF-9 Gantry support bracket - EWS-8 Curtain walling / gantry support bracket - EWS-8 min. 150 6mm aluminium fascia trims - EWS-3A Curtain walling - EWS-3A FCL - refer to RCP Structural slab to S.E. details Steel beam to S.E. details 02 24.06.14 Facades Construction Issue PC OM Suspended acoustic baffle - CLG-1 DE KE Blind with cable/pot guides - EWS-3A 01 08.11.13 Revised Tender Issue. DE KE Plasterboard lining to floor beams - CLG-9 drawn chkd - 01.11.13 Tender Issue. rev date notes Design Engine Architects Limited The Studios, Coker Close, Winchester SO22 5FF www.designengine.co.uk 01962 890111 project title date of origin scale AUB Photography October 2013 1:5 @ A1 / 1:10 @ A3 client drawing title Arts University Bournemouth External Envelope Section Details status drawing reference revision CONSTRUCTION 1216-5501 02 Precedent details Precedent detail 8 9 10 Rooflight in 6 equal sections CL CL CL CL CL CL CL 900 900 900 900 900 900 G approx location of internal lining below 1 03.11.14 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION - updated in full t reflect Value Engineering - 06.12.13 ISSUED FOR TENDER rev date note No. & location of opening lights TBC by Design s/contractor design, to achieve minimum 2.3 sqm The Studios, Coker Clo free area for purposes of smoke ventilation. Note: Automatic opening vents linked to BMS & Fire alarm systems project title date of origin 1:2 AUB Student Services November 2013 client drawing title Arts University Bournemouth EWS-4 Window Elevatio Sheet 8 (Rooflight) - Bui status drawing reference CONSTRUCTION 1234-8207 Precedent photographs Precedent photographs Precedent photograph 43

3.10 _ Interior - Joinery (servery) Design intent precedent: Photography Building - Arts University Bournemouth Precedent details Precedent photographs 44

3.11 _ Interior - HUET Key visual requirements: • Installation of specialist equipment to follow strategy outlined under section 3.7 • Allow for painting of agreed elements of structure/services to highlight key components • Careful coordination of installation between specialist system and general building M&E installation Key section through HUET Design intent precedent: John Payne Building - Oxford Brookes University Precedent photographs 45

Ground floor plan 9 15 5 11 36 8 4 7 4 7 2 1 16 2 6 12 3 4 6 4 1 Key - Ground floor 14 17 15 17 1. Entrance 2. Cafe + servery 16 3. Medical theory 4. Changing 13 5. Plant 5 6. Stair 7. Lift 8. HUET pool 9. TEMPSC pool 10. Repair 11. Store 12. Breakout 13. Briefing/De-briefing 14. Outwear store 15. Laundry 16. Drying room 17. External terrace 46

First floor plan 3.12 _ Interior - 3D plans 9 4 8 7 16 6 11 2 7 6 2 1 10 4 6 5 3 10 1 12 3 Key - First floor 12 13 11 11 1. Circulation 2. Offshore theory 11 3. Maritime theory 4. Changing 14 15 6 5. Hub room 17 6. Stair 7. Lift 8. HUET pool 9. TEMPSC pool 10. Toilets 11. Tutorial room 12. Classroom 13. Simulator 14. Meeting room 15. Office 16. Drying room 17. Covered terrace 47

Boundary treatment extent plan (Waterside to Fire Building) Boundary treatment extent plan (Fire Building to end of site) Key Boundary treatment type 1 Boundary treatment type 2 Boundary treatment type 3 48

3.13 _ Externals - Boundary treatment Perimeter Fencing/Walling As part of the scheme we will look to enhance the West boundary of the site between the Waterside Building and the south boundary of the site. To achieve this we will look both to add to existing boundary treatments as well as introduce new ones. We will look to add additional security mesh fence topping to the existing 1200mm high wall between the Waterside and fire school buildings, a new brick wall will be erected to replace the palisade fencing at the end of the fire ground and a new security mesh fence will replace the palisade fencing to the rest of the west boundary. Existing brick wall to be enhanced with addition of Existing palisade fencing to edge of fire ground to be Existing palisade fencing to remainder of west security mesh fence topping to bring total height to replaced with 1800mm high brick wall, to match boundary be replaced with 1800mm security mesh 1800mm existing adjacent brick. fencing. Example of security mesh fencing Example of Ruskin Red brickwork to match existing adjacent wall 49