Design Engine, Isle of Wight Ryde, Expression of Interest

Isle of Wight Regeneration Programme Site 04 : Ryde Nicholson Road Expression of Interest DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS \ MARCH 2017 QUOTATION REFERENCE NO: RY04/201702DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 1

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 1

Contents About Us Our Approach to Masterplanning About Your Project — Site 04: • Project Objectives • Deliverables • Timeline Stakeholder Engagement Relevant Feasibility Studies: 1.Technology Park, Bracknell 2.Testwood Park, Totton 3.Cedar Park, Andover Consultant Team & CV’sDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 2

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 3

About Us With our studios in central Winchester, we are ideally placed for this project; 40m from the site and with easy links to London for meetings with Inner Circle. • Established in 2000 • 37 people in our Winchester Studio • 48 Awards • 14 RIBA Awards • Projects range from masterplans to bridges • Construction budgets from £0.5m to £90mDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 4

ABOUT US Stakeholders Ryde Site 04 IOW Council Inner Circle Design Engine Architects Team Cost Consultant Buro Happold Sub ConsultantsFinance Manager Review Project Civil / Structural Eng FacadesIT Manager Director Director GeotechnicComms Manager Traffic Associate ProjectAdmin Team Director Architect(s) Env / BS Eng Acoustic Lighting Associate Interior Designer BIW Manager Architectural AssistantsDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 5

ABOUT US“ Design Engine Architects are a very professional and dedicated company. The Directors and staff are very competent and really do consider the client’s needs. Some architectural practices are only interested in the design (and what the design can do for their practice). Design Engine really do want the client to have a building they can afford to own as well as one that delights them.” Kerry Hutchings Head of Major Projects, Foreign and Commonwealth OfficeDesign Engine Architects Design by dialogue Award-winning deliveryRichard Rose-Casemore, Richard Jobson and Rodney Graham We like to develop our designs through close dialogue with all We pride ourselves on the delivery of our projects. We invest asformed Design Engine Architects as a Private Limited Company in project stakeholders. This is a key part of our service and is never a much in the process of technical design and productionDecember 2001. time-limited exercise. The client briefing process in particular, is a information as we do in client briefing, scheme design delivery key part of the relationship-building process and when properly and the making of planning applications.Our staff receive the bestDesign Engine's projects are designed and delivered by a undertaking always leads to a truly successful project. training possible in order to deliver our clients outstandingdedicated team of staff, who offer a first-class quality driven service projects.to its clients. The practice has a wealth of experience working on Director-led Designsnew buildings but also within sensitive historic settings and with Our projects are always director-led from inception to completion. Lessons learntconstruction budgets ranging to date from £0.5 million - £90 We consider the delivery of a building to be a journey for all partiesmillion in value. Models concerned. We believe it is vital that once it is complete an In addition to the production of drawings and CGI’s a uniqueness opportunity is made to reflect on the positives and negatives of theDesign Engine's work holds the synthesis of high quality design of the practice is the sheer number of physical models that we outcome.and sustainability as a core value and consequently many produce to explore and explain a project. These become hugelycompleted projects have been honoured with awards, including important when describing ideas to stakeholders, as we find theyRIBA Stirling Mid-list, an RIBA International Award, the LEAF bring clarity to a proposal that drawings often cannot. Models are(Leading European Architects Forum) Sustainability Award and always supplemented by drawings and CGI’s which are producednumerous RIBA, Civic Trust, RTPI and BCI awards and in-house by our highly skilled team.commendations. The Practice has received 48 Design Awardssince 2001. Currently the practice employs 36 people which Team approachincludes 22 qualified architects and 9 assistant architects. We like to work closely with our client and consultant team alike and to date have enjoy long-term and fulfilling workingSite analysis relationships with the many clients and professionals we haveWe undertake very careful analysis of the site which we use to lead encountered.us to the development of potential site-specific concepts arisingfrom the brief.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 6

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 7

Our Approach to Masterplanning An insight into our masterplan process.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 8

OUR APPROACHMasterplanningThe masterplan process Potential masterplan challenges for Site 04Most of our projects begin with some form of masterplan • Historic / Heritage sensitivities.approach. This provides a roadmap for any future development • Topographical challenges.ensuring that short term decisions are robustly tested against the • Archaeology.long term vision for the site. • Flood risk. • Funding streams and phasing strategies.It also provides a structure to funding strategies and to marketing • Neighbours and adjacent users.campaigns. • Local Authority resistant to piecemeal development. • Services/transport infrastructure insufficient for newLocal authorities are reassured by the holistic approach inherentin the masterplan process. It ensures that each individual development.planning application is set within a planning context, and part of • Difficult to access in order to develop.an overall design philosophy for the site. • Potential for significant pre-project sub-phases.The masterplan process in this instance may address many of thefollowing challenges:DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 9

OUR APPROACH KA 1 Option 1 KA 1Masterplanning current site of St Swithun’s Lodge and the Cottage provides potential to build an academic and office building large enough to Holm replace Herbert Jarman, releasing site KA 2. StableA working campus site Holm LodgeMost of our projects involve the intervention of new buildings, New Build Demolition Rate Approximaterefurbishment of existing structures and new landscaping within GIA sqm GIA sqm (£/sqm) Cost (£M) St James’s Halla working environment that needs to operate throughout the (approx.) (approx.)construction process. Building St Elizabeth’s HallHealth and safety St Swithun’s Lodge 617 114 0.07 St Grimbald’sThe safety of employees and visitors is critical so any site widestrategy needs to anticipate all risks and manage them The Cottage 131 114 0.01throughout the life of the project and beyond. The safemovement of people across the site as well as within structures Herbert Jarman 1,368 114 0.16needs to be considered. Herbert Jarman Extn 1,354 114 0.15Noise and disruptionWe understand the importance of containing noise and Building A - Academic / Office 2300 3,246 7.5disruption on site. We have learnt through our work in schoolsand universities how to mitigate noise during examination Building B - Academic / Office 1200 3,246 3.9 2722 sqm DECANT HERBERTperiods and maintain quiet teaching and work environments. JARMAN AND HERBERTAny design approach needs to also maintain deliveries as well as TOTAL 3500 3,470 11.8 JARMAN EXTN INTOclean dust free working environments. BUILDINGS A +BPhasingA phased design approach is often key to the delivery of any Multistoryproject. The phasing strategy is progressed in parallel with the Carparkarchitectural design proposals serving as a road map for thedelivery of the project, as well as a mechanism for managing the WD 2 748 sqm POSSIBLE OFFICEcost plan and funding. DECANT TO WD 1DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 10 Student Residences Nursery WD 1 KA 1 B Herbert Jarman Main Building Student A can be demolished Centre St.Edburga Kenneth Chapel St.Alphege John Stripe Kettle Library Theatre Queens Road Fred Tom Student Village Wheeler Atkinson Programme Overview 2 years, 6 months Alwyn Hall Project 0 12 months 748 sqm Commences POSSIBLE OFFICE DECANT TO Sports TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION IN Hall THE DYTCH Performing Arts Design Development / Construction (18 months) Planning (12 months) Start on Site Completion Design Engine Architects Ltd © 2013 Option 2 KA 2 KA 2 Holm NB: reliant on option 1 or on Stable possible decant into WD 1 current site of Herbert Jarman, with potential for development into academic / commercial space following completion of KA 1. Holm Lodge New Build Rate Approximate 3. GIA sqm (£/sqm) Cost (£M) (approx.) 1. New teaching building frame under construction - centre Building 2,994 4.5 of the St Alphege campus - Winchester University Building C - Academic / Commercial 1500 2,994 4.8 Building D - Academic / Commercial 9.3 2. Phasing diagrams for the University Of Winchester TOTAL 1600 St James’s Hall masterplan. St Elizabeth’s Hall 3100 St Grimbald’s 3. Oxford Brookes University under construction Programme Overview 2 years, 6 months Project 0 12 months Multistory Commences Carpark Design Development / Construction (18 months) Planning (12 months) Start on Site Completion Student Residences Nursery A KA 1 B C D Main Building Student KA 2 Centre Kenneth Chapel St.Edburga Kettle St.Alphege John Stripe Theatre Library Queens Road Fred Tom Student Village Wheeler Atkinson Alwyn Hall Performing Arts Sports Hall KA 1 + KA 2 Design Engine Architects Ltd © 2013 New Build Demolition Rate Approximate Total Capacity of Options 1 + 2 GIA sqm GIA sqm (£/sqm) Cost (£M) (approx.) (approx.) Holm Stable Holm Lodge Building 617 114 0.07 St Swithun’s Lodge 114 0.01 The Cottage 131 114 0.16 Herbert Jarman 114 0.15 Herbert Jarman Extn 1,368 3,246 Building A 3,246 7.5 Building B 1,354 2,994 3.9 St James’s Hall Building C - Academic / Commercial 2,994 4.5 St Elizabeth’s Hall Building D - Academic / Commercial 2300 4.8 St Grimbald’s TOTAL 21.0 NET change 1200 1500 1600 6600 3,470 Multistory Carpark 3130 Nursery Minimum Programme Overview Student Residences KA 1 0 B C D Main Building 12 months A KA 1 KA 2 2 years, 6 months Kenneth St.Edburga Student 4 years Kettle St.Alphege Centre Design Chapel Development / Construction John Stripe Theatre Decant (3 months) KA 2 Library Design Fred Tom Development / Construction Wheeler Atkinson Queens Road Alwyn Hall Student Village 2. Performing Arts Sports Hall Design Engine Architects Ltd © 2013

OUR APPROACHMasterplanning Framework for development 2. 4. We see a masterplan as a flexible framework for future development. Explored in both 2D and 3D, design at this scale involves infrastructure of services, roads and pedestrian movements. Places and spaces are created between and around buildings. Working with existing buildings More often than not, masterplanning involves the judicious retention, removal and extension of existing buildings to create such a framework. Surprising results which exceed Client expectations can often result.1. Cedar Park, Andover.2. Arts University Bournemouth.3. Jesselton Quay, Borneo.4. Arts University Bournemouth, campus extension. 3.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 11

OUR APPROACH 3. A Commercial Campus Sense of place Our ambition with any project is to create a memorable and exciting destination that celebrates brand values and cultural values. Heart of the campus We like to seek and enhance the natural centre of gravity of the campus, its heart and creative centre. Once found this forms the cultural focus of the workplace environment. Landscape From an early stage in the design process we like to consider the spaces between the buildings and how they are landscaped. We view landscape as an essential component of any campus design creating a series of formal and informal exterior spaces to greet, meet and gather.1. Historic quarter masterplan, Farnborough.2. Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane campus.3. Oxford Brookes University, Public Realm. 2. DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 12

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 13

About Your Project: Site 04 • Project Objectives • Deliverables • TimelineDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 14

ABOUT YOUR PROJECT Access junction will require improvements Ryde Business ParkSite 04 Liz Earle, beauty product company Railway station Public footpath to be retained and improved Island train line Mimise impact on neighbouring residential area Opportunity for new train station Secondary road access possible ISLE OF WIGHT REGENERATION PROGRAMME SITE 04 RYDE NICHOLSON ROAD Outline planning permission for Penny Feathers SITE MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS residential development but the project has not v0.1 27/02/17 moved aheadDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 15

ABOUT YOUR PROJECTSite 04Project Objectives• Engage the community • Plan for a phased delivery Engage the local community in the planning and design of the Develop a masterplan that allows for delivery in stages. site. • Develop a sound funding strategy• Double the size of the current successful business park Deliver the Island Plan policy that allows for enabling residential By securing planning permission to extend onto adjacent land to development to pay for works to bring forward plots and the south. infrastructure to support industrial land.• Put in place enabling development to facilitate growth • Explore opportunities for sustainable transport options Provide infrastructure to extend the existing business park with Create a mixed-use site and ensure planning is supported by a industrial and office space alongside enabling development. sustainable strategy for parking and improved pedestrian,• Create additional jobs cycling and public transport access. Create temporary construction-related jobs and new permanent employment opportunities through by developing space for new and existing businesses.• Generate additional income for the Council Generate ongoing revenue income through retained business rates from new commercial premises on the site.• Ensure plots are suitably sized and flexible to ensure future commercial space appropriate for demand Create employment space that meets the spatial requirements and financial constraints of new and growing businesses.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 16

ABOUT YOUR PROJECTSite 04Deliverables Initial options:Analysis and mapping of development opportunities andconstraints based on the information provided, meetings • Explore development options for the site.with the client group and desktop research, including: • Review and update current assumptions of development levels• Site vision and objectives on the site.• Site opportunities and constraints• Site access (for vehicles and pedestrians) and servicing (utilities) • Consider size, quantity, juxtaposition and distribution of• Adjacent uses including any that could relocate and expand on preferred uses across the site. the site • Consider phasing of development options. • Consider feasibility and viability of options including initial input• Planning context and history• Site and area history from viability consultants.• Other relevant site information • Consider site access, operational and maintenance solutions.• Engineering and technical challenges • Create 3D massing studies including context, proposed volumes coloured by use and proposed floor areas. • Develop design principals and narrative for the site options. • Options Workshop with client group: • Presentation of site analysis and initial options • Workshop to refine and agree 3 options to assess viabilityDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 17

ABOUT YOUR PROJECTSite 04Deliverables Cont’d Final feasibility study TimelineDraft feasibility study • Deliver final feasibility study incorporating client comments to 15/03/17• Further develop 3 options agreed with client group. inform the Outline Business Case. Design team selected• Develop final 3D massing for 3 options including context, Formats 28/03/17 proposed volumes coloured by use and proposed floor areas. Kick-off meeting and site visit (Newport, Isle of Wight)• Indicative phasing for the 3 options. • All documents and plans should be formatted to A4 or A3 page 12/04/17• Set out design principals and narrative for the site options. size. Site analysis and initial options workshop (Newport, Isle of Wight)• Costing and viability appraisal of the 3 agreed options in • Presentation, draft and final documents should also be shared in 28/04/17 collaboration with the client-side cost and viability consultants. PDF format. Draft feasibility study issued to client team• Initial assessment of impact of options on the local community, • Any information prepared or obtained should be shared by the 03/05/17 environment and transport. design team in a format which can be readily shared and used. Meeting – Draft feasibility study feedback (Newport, Isle of Wight)• Identify further site surveys and site information necessary 10/05/17 (geotechnical studies, assessment of any contamination, Final feasibility study availability of services, uses of adjoining land, easements and restrictive covenants, environmental impact, phase 2 ecology We have reviewed this timeline and can confirm we feel it survey etc.) is achievable, subject to efficient feedback responses from third parties.• Summary of engineering and technical challenges. High level structural and service engineering input may be required. This should be provided by the selected design team either in-house or by a sub-consultant as necessary.• Deliver draft feasibility study for comment.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 18

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 19

Stakeholder Engagement Design by Dialogue and our Client CareDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 20

ABOUT USStakeholder EngagementDesign by DialogueWe enjoy the process of sharing the design journey with thevarious user groups and stakeholders, and value their contributiontowards the final proposals. Feedback is recorded and reviewedby the design team.We invest time in preparing presentations, drawings and modelstailored specifically for local audiences. Communicating our ideasclearly through three dimensional physical, as well as computergenerated models makes this process efficient and focussed.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 21 Stakeholder workshops for Cedar Park and Princes Mead school

ABOUT USStakeholder EngagementKey External Stakeholder Engagement the backdrop of statutory matters such as planning/listed buildings will often need to consult directly with senior client-users who areWorking in the realm of large scale developments is of enormous applications procedures and any statutory notice periods etc. responsible for specific aspects of the schools operation.significance to us, since it affords us an opportunity to exercise ourpassion for combining modern, sustainable architecture within the The role of the design team and in particular the architect is to Whether we are working on a design for a specific building or acontext of individual settings and contexts. support the engagement process with the necessary material to wider strategic masterplan, we adopt an approach which we refer enable presentations and face to face consultation to occur, as well to as ‘design by dialogue’. The phrase captures the essence of theFrom this unique position we have been fortunate to develop new as being involved in the presentation/consultation events in process we undertake, which is to work closely with our clients inarchitectural strategies and responses that are both respectful of person. Very often we will provide physical models of a proposal as order to consolidate the brief and to establish different andthe place but which are driven by progressive thinking about the these are very often the most easily understood medium. appropriate options in response. Our preference is for our designsfuture needs and aspirations. to emerge in face to face workshops, where the client has direct We are well experienced in the consultation process itself and with involvement and input in the process alongside the manyA key to the success of a project in this type of environment is how managing feedback and resistance that might arise during the professional consultants that need to be involved in boththe designs are supported by key external stakeholders such as the engagement cycle so that the ambitions of the process can be masterplan and building projects. Finding the most appropriateLocal Authority Planning and Conservation Officers, achieved through a process of sensitive negotiation. means to engage in dialogue and ultimately to present the outputsrepresentatives of Historic England and local community individual of the work both within the project and with the manybodies and/or groups. Client Care stakeholders that surround a project is a major consideration. Our We pride ourselves on our approach to our work, in particular how approach is very much dictated by the type of project, the physicalAs with all external consultation, we work with the client to we listen to our clients. Our focus is to treat the client as a key part context of the project and client sensitivities including theirdevelop a carefully considered strategy of engagement which is of the design team and whilst we expect to be the ones doing the previous experience in delivering projects.programmed to work well with the key milestones identified for the hard work, we recognise the enormous insight and expertise thatproject. This ensures that the time-periods for consideration and the client can bring to the design process. For us the key to To support the design process we hold a range of skills in-house,response arising through the consultation process are dovetailed understanding the clients brief is to understand the clients including physical model-making, realistic computer generatedwith the clients own expectations of progressing the designs with approach to education and pastoral care, the long-term vision and images, fly-through films and a vast range of 2-dimensional values of the institution and the constitutional arrangements in drawing types. Often a project has benefitted from making studyDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 22 respect of how decisions need to be made by the client body. We tours to completed buildings where there has been a similar brief or an interesting aspect about a project relating to the brief.

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 23

Relevant Feasibility Studies 1. Technology Park, Bracknell 2. Testwood Park, Totton 3. Cedar Park, AndoverDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 24

RELEVANT FEASIBILITY EXAMPLE 1 Technology Park BracknellPROJECT DETAILS PROJECT SUMMARYClient Private This was an invited competition for a new Centre of Excellence for a high-profileProject Competition racing company, incorporating manufacturing, testing and design facilities.Location BracknellConstruction value N/A Involving the masterplanning of an existing site, the proposed new and remodelledSize 24,000sqm (258,000 facilities had to be constructed over time in a series of phases without disruption tosqft) ongoing operations. Our work included strategic proposals for this sequencing,Year 2016 illustrating how activities could be continued uninterrupted throughout the enabling works and construction programme. Access, deliveries and parking formed a critical focus of the study, as did the ‘showcase’ element at the reception where visitors would be invited to view prototypes etc.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 25

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 26

RELEVANT FEASIBILITY EXAMPLE 2 Testwood Park TottonPROJECT DETAILS PROJECT SUMMARYClient UBS Planning Permission was gained for a development which sought to integrate theProject Stage Planning Approval new buildings into the setting. Reducing the impact of the development on the siteLocation Totton by creating smaller volumes that are generously spaced and creating permeabilityBudget Approx £25m across the site.Size Devt Site 4.1 HectaresYear 2013 The existing condition presents a large single volume of the warehouse is inappropriate to the setting and the proposed development aims to rectify this with the provision of a number of smaller volumes. The smaller edges of the proposed development aim to define spaces of suitable scale and character. Whilst the proposed buildings have a relationship with one another, their permeable arrangement across the site offers view, interest and enclosure, whilst promoting movement and interaction with the surroundings. The proposed accommodation is divided across six new buildings; each designed with space around it and screened by deciduous trees which aid solar shading in summer. Testwood House itself is part three-storey, part two-storey in height. The new buildings are intentionally set at a lower level from Testwood House to differentiate between the old and new elements on site. The overriding aim has been to minimise the impact of this development: to restrict the height, reduce the mass and to provide generous landscape between buildings.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 27

DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 28

RELEVANT FEASIBILITY EXAMPLE 3 Cedar Park AndoverPROJECT DETAILS PROJECT SUMMARYClient Enham Trust Design Engine were selected in competition from a shortlist of six practices toProject Stage On Site design the new Cedar Park estate for Enham Trust which is based at Enham AlameinLocation Andover, Enham near Andover, Hampshire. The project will deliver a centre of excellence to supportAlamein people with acquired brain injuries, complex and extra care needs, and an evenBudget 16m wider choice of temporary and permanent homes for disabled people. In additionSize 7,500sqm (80,700 sqft) there will be a new health and well-being centre, restaurant and meeting spaces.Year 2017 Design Engine also designed Enham Trust’s first town centre housing development, Bradbury Place, which consists of eight wheelchair accessible homes in Andover, giving residents the opportunity to live independently with easy access to amenities and work opportunities and are currently working with the charity on accessible housing projects on two infill sites within the wider village of Enham Alamein.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 29

107.13 FFL FFL 101.65 101.65 FFL 101.65 103.60 Lower 103.75 Upper (106.75) 103.75 FFL 101.65 101.60 100.90 103.75 101.60 (103.90) 103.75 101.60 103.75 101.60 Lower 101.60 100.90 103.60 103.75 103.75 101.60 Upper (104.60) (103.90) 101.60 103.75 103.75 101.60 Lower 103.75 103.75 106.75 Upper (106.75) 103.75 100.90 103.75 103.75 100.90 Lower 103.75 (103.90) Upper (106.75) 103.75 100.90 103.60 103.45 (103.90) 103.15 102.85 101.60 FFL 103.75 103.45 103.15 FFL 100.90 103.75 Upper (103.90) 103.75 103.75 103.75 103.75 103.45 103.15 101.60 FFL 101.65 104.05 Upper(104.05) 104.35 101.60 103.75 102.70 101.65 Lower 101.65 FFL 101.60 Upper (104.65) 103.3 101.65 101.65 102.9 101.35 101.60 102.5 100.75 FFL FFL 102.0 101.35 101.75 101.75 101.05 101.35 FFL 101.05 101.75 100.75 FFL FFL 100.75 103.9 101.75 Upper (103.9) 103.6 100.75 103.9 103.6 103.3 FFL 103.3 100.75 FFL 100.75 FFL 103.0 100.75 100.75 103.00 101.2 103.6 103.3 FFL 101.5 100.75 101.8 102.7 FFL 102.4 100.75 FFL 100.77 100.75 FFL 100.00DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 30 1 Site Access Plan 01 5 10m 1:500

OUR TEAMConsultant TeamDesign Engine will lead the project and will provide necessary We propose to sub-consult the services of Buro Happold (Bathcentral services on Site 04: office) for the high-level strategic engineering advice on this project for:• Masterplanning• Architecture • Civil & Structural • Environmental and MEPWe enclose the brief resume of the people who we feel have the Buro Happold are also able to provide services for the following,appropriate experience for this project. should Inner Circle need additional consultancy outside this appointment: • Flood Analysis • Contamination • Traffic & TransportDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 31

PRICING SCHEDULEFeasibility StudyPlease note, day rates shown here are cost rates rather than charge- This kind of strategic high-level work necessitates high-level inputout rates. Should additional work be required beyond this from Design Engine as lead consultant and Buro Happold, and thisexercise, these would be at £900, £645 and is reflected in this pricing schedule.£385 respectively. Supporting the Design Engine director in charge is a project architect/engineer and a graduate architect/engineer.Tasks Director in Charge Associate/Proj Arch/Eng Graduate Arch/EngSite analysis and initial options Day rate £300 £160 £135 - - 3.0 3.0 3.5 - 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.5Draft feasibility study - 2.5 4.0 6.0 - 2.5 4.0 6.0 - 2.5 4.0 6.0Final feasibility study 2.0 3.5 6.5 - 2.0 3.5 6.5 - 2.0 3.5 6.5 - 22.5 31.5 48.0 £6,480Total days £6,750 £5,040Total cost £18,270Sub-totalExpenses (included in fixed fee total) £1,500 £0 - £0 - £19,770 -Fixed fee totalDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 32

RESUMES Richard Rose-Casemore RIBA FRSA MCSD David Gausden RIBA FCSD Director DirectorEDUCATION SUMMARY CV EDUCATION SUMMARY CV1988-1989Professional Management Richard is a co-founder of Design Engine and, with his fellow 1987-1989 David studied architecture at Canterbury College Of Art and the Kentin Architecture RIBA Pt3 directors, is responsible for the design direction of the practice. He Kent Institute of Art & Institute of Art and Design. Prior to joining Design Engine in 2003, he(Distinction) enjoys working in all sectors and at all scales: from masterplanning to Design Diploma in worked for Pentagram Design Ltd, Apicella Associates, MacCormac interior design, with architecture at the centre. He has been the Architecture RIBA Pt2 Jamieson Prichard, and the London and Hong Kong offices of Terry1985-1987 recipient of numerous RIBA and Civic Trust Awards during 25 years of (Distinction). Farrell and Partners.Plymouth University, practice, and received the Stephen Lawrence Prize for his own houseDiploma in Architecture in Winchester at the 2001 Stirling Prize celebrations. 1983-1986 David has an expertise in education within primary, secondary andRIBA Pt2 (Distinction) Canterbury College of Art University sectors. Projects include La Mare De Carteret Schools and Before the creation of Design Engine, Richard was a director of Degree in Architecture Les Beaucamps High School In Guernsey, The Performing Arts Studios1981-1984 Architecture PLB, senior architect with Rogers Stirk Harbour, and an RIBA Pt1 at the University Of Winchester and the reception to the Old BuildingPlymouth University, associate of ORMS after graduating with distinction and coming at the London School Of Economics. He has brought his interest andDegree in Architecture runner-up in the RIBA Student President’s Medals. Richard has experience in interior and exhibition design to projects across sectorsRIBA Pt1 travelled widely as part of his training as well as in his practice, and that include educational, ecclesiastical and commercial commissions. worked in South Africa for a year as an under-graduate.SKILLS Recent Independent Schools projects include Twyford School andArchitecture Richard has a particular passion for teaching and led a post-graduate Stowe SchoolMasterplanning studio at Oxford Brookes University School of Architecture betweenSustainable Design 1995 and 2010. He continues to act as a visiting critic at OBU, Bath, He has taught throughout his career as a visiting tutor and critic, mostInterior Design Bartlett, Portsmouth, Brighton and Plymouth Schools. Richard has recently at Oxford Brookes University. He also mentors students withinStrategic Delivery taught Professional Practice at the Architectural Association, and has the practice and as part of the RIBA mentoring scheme.Practice Management been an external examiner at the UCL Bartlett and PortsmouthClient Design Advisor Schools. He is currently a Fellow of Royal Society of Arts, a Visiting David is a Fellow of the Chartered Society of Designers and a memberDesign Review Fellow of Oxford Brookes University, a Member of the Chartered of The Coastal West Sussex Design Panel and the Jersey Commission Society of Designers, and an RIBA Client Design Advisor. He was Design Panel.DESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 33 CABE Representative for SE England for five years and now chairs or sits on various Design Review Panels and the HEDQF. SKILLS RELEVANT EXPERIENCE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Architecture Les Beaucamps High School, Guernsey, 2013 Oxford Brookes University, John Henry Brookes Building Masterplanning Director responsible for the design and strategic delivery of a new 2007-2013 (130m) Client Liaison High school. New Library, Social Learning Space, Student Services Centre, Student Interior Design RIBA Award 2013, RIBA Client Award 2013, Civic Trust award 2014 Union, Food Hall, multiple teaching rooms, with extension to 1950’s Exhibition Design Guernsey Design Award 2014 teaching building incorporating the new School of Architecture. Product Design Mobile Structures Twyford School Masterplan 2016 Ramboll Consulting Engineers HQ, Southampton, 2005 Sustainable Design Project director for the new masterplan project. New Headquarters and National Centre of Excellence for the Project Delivery Engineering firm Gifford (now Ramboll). Low Energy Office of the Year and David Alsop Award 2005

RESUMES James Salman RIBA Tamsin Thomas RIBA Senior Associate AssociateEDUCATION SUMMARY CV EDUCATION SUMMARY CV2007-2008 James studied at Brighton University. Before joining Design Engine he 2001-2002 Tamsin studied Architecture at The University of Cambridge andRIBA North West Adv. worked for PTW in Sydney Australia.James has also worked on various South Bank University Prof. Oxford Brookes University, qualifying as an architect in 2002. Prior toDiploma in Prof. Practice in schemes for the development of the Charterhouse School campus in Management Cert. in joining Design Engine in 2008, Tamsin had wide ranging professionalArchitecture RIBA Pt3 Surrey, and been responsible for a number of projects at Design Architecture RIBA Pt3 experience at Alec French Architects in Bristol where she was an Engine including a new building for the University of Winchester Associate and as a Project Architect at Buckley Gray Yeoman2003-2005 which achieved BREEAM excellent and has received an RIBA Award. 1998-2000 Architects in London.University of Brighton Oxford Brookes UniversityDiploma in Architecture As well as experience in the education and commercial sectors, James Diploma in Architecture Tamsin has led many projects as Project Architect from conception toRIBA Pt2 has been involved in numerous housing projects. As a qualified BRE RIBA Pt2 completion, with particular interests in Education, Community and Code for Sustainable Homes Assessor, James is able to conduct in- Historic building projects that have a complex brief, requiring an in-1999-2002 house technical design reviews in order to assess housing schemes 1993-1996 depth understanding of Clients’ aspirations and needs as well asUniversity of Brighton during the development stage. James has excellent project delivery University of Cambridge considered interaction with surrounding environments and existingDegree in Architecture and organisational skills and is capable of delivering large complex MA in Architecture RIBA buildings.RIBA Pt1 projects within tight deadlines. James has a particular interest in Pt1 sustainability; not only limited to new buildings, but also intelligent At Design Engine she has brought her experience of education adaptation and re-use of existing buildings. buildings to the team that has successfully delivered the new masterplan for Twyford School. She is also the client liaison and Amongst James’ other practice duties, James is a member of the IT/ associate in charge of the Downe House School project. CAD group and also actively contributes to design reviews of projects and procedures at regular intervals. James is responsible for Tamsin spent several years (whilst in practice) as a Studio Tutor in the coordinating and implementing ISO 9001 for the practice, and schools of architecture at The University of Bath and The University of addressing and monitoring practice quality management standards. the West of England and continues her teaching as an occasional Visiting Critic.SKILLS RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SKILLS RELEVANT EXPERIENCEArchitecture University of Winchester, 2013 Architecture Twyford School Masterplan, 2016Masterplanning Lead designer & Project Architect responsible for the design and Masterplanning Design and client Liaison. Associate lead.Client Liaison delivery and project management Client LiaisonDetailed Design BREEAM Excellent. RIBA award 2013 Education Buildings Downe House School masterplan and new Learning CentreSpecification writing Historic Buildings Client Liaison and project associate.Visualisation Charterhouse School, 2012 Detailed DesignSustainable Design Lead designer & Project Architect responsible for the design and Sustainable DesignProject Delivery delivery and project management of new dining facilities and Specification Writing refurbishment of an existing connected building. Project DeliveryDESIGN ENGINE ARCHITECTS | 34