VPS.BQS-SB20152547-DEF

Bunker Quantity Survey Report date 7-Dec-2015 Maersk A/SMaersk NijmegenRotterdam 4-Dec-2015Executive summary 1. RMG180ULSFO There was no quantity dispute for this bunkering. The Bunker Delivery Note (BDN) was issued for 375.202 M.Tons. The Bunker Tanker’s quantity is 377.009 M.Tons. The density difference is -2.2 kg/m³ or -0.91 M.Tons. The water content is Lower than 0.1 % V/V. VPS Sampling Information RMG180ULSFO Grade - Refer to ‘comments’ A-3.Fuel Grade Ordered RMG180ULSFOQuantity Ordered 375 M. TonsSupplier Maersk Oil TradingBunker Tanker Jaimy VLocation Rotterdam, Waalhaven UniportVPS Colour Code usedNormal Caution Problem 1 / 5 SB20152547

1. RMG180ULSFO | Maersk Nijmegen1. RMG180ULSFO1.1 On Site Quantity Data 375.202 M. Tonsa Bunker Delivery Note 377.926 M. Tonsb VPS Measurements (Bunker Tanker Out-Turn) 378.035 M. Tonsc VPS Measurements (Vessel Out-Turn)d Difference (c-b) 0.109 M. Tons1.2 Quantity & Quality Data Volume at Density at Mass Weight Factor Weight 15°C (m3) 15°C (Kg/m3) (M. (Kg/ m3) (M. Tons) Tons)Bunker Delivery Note (BDN) 413.400 *907.6 375.202 **906.5 **374.747VPS Measurements (Bunker Tanker 416.907 905.4 377.468 904.3 377.009Out-Turn) 3.507 -2.2 2.266 -2.2 2.262DifferenceVPS Measurements (Vessel Out-Turn) 417.027 905.4 377.576 904.3 377.118“Mass” in this report refers to “Weight in Vacuum” but commercial fuel transactions are typically based on “Weight in air”given here as Weight.* BDN values converted to kg/m³ by VPS.** Not stated on BDN therefore calculated by VPS.Analysis Results 905.4 72.68Density @ 15°C (m3) (Kg/m3)Viscosity @ 50 °C (m3) (Kg/m3) 0.01Water Content (% V/V)WCF corrections based on VPS tested Density and VCF are used in the calculations for Bunker TankerOut-Turn.Our survey procedures require compulsory and thorough bunker tanker inspection before and aftertransfer.Based on our assessment, the receiving vessel has received 1.807 M.Tons more than the Bunker DeliveryNote, of which; a -0.909 M.Tons was due to lower d ensity tested by VPS, and b +3.171 M.Tons was due to higher volume measurement by VPS, and c -0.455 M.Tons was due to Weight Correction Factor not used by supplier.1.3 VPS Sampling Information Vessel manifold VesselSampling Point used Manual Drip Sampler Continuous DripSampling Device provided byType of Sampling DeviceSampling Method used 2 / 5 SB20152547

1. RMG180ULSFO | Maersk NijmegenVPS Surveyor’s Sample VPS Seal Number Supplier Seal Num- VPS SealNo Description ber recorded on BDN 0299191 Not Sealed N.A.1 Bunker Quantity Survey 02991922 Vessel Retention 0299193 Not Sealed N.A.3 Bunker Tanker Retention Not Sealed N.A.Supplier’s Samples Supplier Seal Counter Seal Counter SealNo Description Number Number recorded on BDN 0702077 Not Sealed N.A.1 Retained by Bunker Tanker 0702078 Not Sealed N.A.2 Retained by Bunker Tanker3 Retained by Vessel 0702076 Not Sealed N.A.4 Vessel Retention (MARPOL) 0702075 Not Sealed N.A.Chief Engineer’s Samples C/Eng Seal Number Counter Seal Counter SealNo Description Number recorded on BDN Not Sealed N.A.1 For analysis at the VISWA lab V324044 Not Sealed N.A.2 Retained by Supplier V324043 Not Sealed N.A. Not Sealed N.A.3 Retained by Vessel V3240414 Vessel Retention (MARPOL) V3240421.4 Comments 1 The Supplier did not counter-seal the VPS sample bottles.2 There was no Pre-agreed sampling location stated in the survey instruction received by VPS.3 The vessel’s staff took their own 4 samples at the Vessel’s manifold jointly with the VPS Surveyor. Two samples retained on board, 1 as vessel’s MARPOL sample and 1 as vessel’s retention sample, 1 sample was passed to the bunker tanker and 1 sample was sent to the VISWA Lab.4 The bunker tanker’s staff took their own 4 samples at the bunker tanker pipeline by Spot Method. One sample was passed to the vessel’s staff as the MARPOL sample and 1 sample as vessel’s retained sample. The other 2 samples retained on board of the bunker tanker.5 The C/Eng had signed 4 sample labels of the supplier.1.5 WitnessingThe Vessel’s 3rd Engineer witnessed the opening and closing measurements of both theVessel and the Bunker Tanker.1.6 PhotographsThe VPS Surveyor obtained permission from the vessel’s Chief Engineer to take photographs. 3 / 5 SB20152547

2. Vessel and Bunker Tanker | Maersk Nijmegen2. Vessel and Bunker Tanker2.1 Representatives Mr. S. Ilyin Mr. J. de Koning Chief Engineer Bunker Tanker Representative2.2 Rob & Logbook DataThe vessel’s R.O.B quantity for the nominated grade was determined by the VPS Surveyor prior to thelifting of the fresh bunkers at Rotterdam.The quantity based on the density as declared by the vessel’s Chief Engineer was ascertained as follows:Grade As declared by C/E As measured by VPS SurveyorLSFO Logbook data (M/tons) (M/tons) 04-12-2015 12:00 277.744 283.9002.3 Survey DocumentsWe have attached the following documents: a Vessel Measurement Report. b Bunker Tanker Measurement Report. c Vessel Non-Nominated Bunker Tanks Report d Photographs 4 / 5 SB20152547

3. Time Log Time 3. Time Log | Svenja (9446594) 1700 Surveyor Left Base 1600 Date Vessel Anchored 1730 4 December 2015 Surveyor Boarded Vessel 4 December 2015 1915 4 December 2015 JAIMY V (RMG180ULSFO) 1925 Bunker Tanker Alongside 1945 4 December 2015 Hose Connected 2020 4 December 2015 Surveyor Onboard Bunker Tanker 2320 4 December 2015 Commence Bunkering 0010 4 December 2015 Completed Bunkering 0030 4 December 2015 Hose Disconnected 4 December 2015 Bunker Tanker Departed 0030 4 December 2015 0100 Surveyor Left Vessel 8.0 hours 5 December 2015 Surveyor Returned to Base 5 December 2015 Total Survey Hours3.1 StoppagesThere were no stoppages.3.2 Attending VPS SurveyorMr. Argyrios Schoinas.This Survey has been carried out to the best of our knowledge and our responsibilityis limited to the exercise of reasonable care.This Report is not intended to relieve the buyers & sellers from their contractualobligations.On behalf of Veritas Petroleum Services B.V.Alfred BaertBQS Reporting Coordinator, EuropeEnd of Report for ‘MAERSK NIJMEGEN’For further information on this report please contact your nearest VPS office([email protected] or +31 180 221145)The liability of Veritas Petroleum Services (VPS) for any loss or damage whatsoever and howsoever caused by its bodies, officers oremployees or caused by others who are instrumental in carrying out VPS’ contractual obligations to the Client, whether or not such personhas acted negligently or otherwise and whether or not the loss or damage has affected the Client or any third party who without having anycontractual relations with VPS has acted or made arrangements in reliance on decisions made or information given by or on behalf of VPS,shall be limited to USD200,000 (Two Hundred Thousand) or an amount equal to ten times the agreed fee to be charged for the service inquestion, whichever is less.The Leader in Maritime 5 / 5 SB20152547Testing & Surveys