Mono

47

Хавсралт №2. Пробит загварын үр дүнDependent Variable: ROAMethod: ML - Binary LogitSample: 1 137Included observations: 137Convergence achieved after 1 iterationsCovariance matrix computed using second derivativesVariable Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob.A1 -3.00E-08 5.96E-08 -0.503736 0.6144A2 -0.091466 0.4072A4 0.043501 0.110359 -0.828801 0.0044A8 0.476261 0.0218A9 -0.229574 0.015275 2.847783 0.4997A10 -0.514344 0.0312A11 -0.000102 0.207679 2.293249 0.8314A12 -0.092277 0.5476A13 0.190617 0.340105 -0.675008 0.0457A14 0.223402 0.1964A15 2.44E-05 0.238741 -2.154404 0.4783A16 -0.000285 0.1947A17 -0.001004 0.000480 -0.212919 0.1257А18 0.001203 0.0936А19 0.008701 0.153443 -0.601378 0.0008А21 0.000315 0.5269Mean dependent var 0.710744 0.095412 1.997819 0.455302S.E. of regression 0.452778 1.238300Sum squared resid 23.37095 0.172910 1.292016 1.400040Log likelihood -67.91717 1.303989Avg. log likelihood -0.561299 3.45E-05 0.709053 137 0.000220 -1.296708 0.000655 -1.531397 0.000717 1.676782 0.002603 3.342083 0.000497 0.632814 S.D. dependent var Akaike info criterion Schwarz criterion Hannan-Quinn criter.Obs with Dep=0 39 Total obsObs with Dep=1 98 48

Хавсралт №3. Пробит загварын дахин үнэлгээний үр дүнDependent Variable: ROAMethod: ML - Binary LogitSample: 1 137Included observations: 137Convergence achieved after 10 iterationsCovariance matrix computed using second derivativesVariable Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob.A4 0.476261 0.207679 2.293249 0.0218A8 -0.229574 0.340105 -3.675008 0.0097A10 -0.514344 0.238741 -2.154404 0.0312A18 -0.000102 0.000480 -2.212919 0.0314A19 -0.092277 0.153443 -2.601378 0.0276A13 0.190617 0.095412 1.997819 0.0457Mean dependent var 0.640777 S.D. dependent var 0.480942S.E. of regression 0.457749 Akaike info criterion 1.229611Sum squared resid 41.90678 Schwarz criterion 1.326539Log likelihood -120.6499 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.268812Avg. log likelihood -0.585679Obs with Dep=0 39 Total obs 137Obs with Dep=1 98 Хавсралт №4. Omitted тестийн үр дүн Value df Probability 0.0092 Likelihood ratio 18.68223 7 LR test summary: Value df Restricted LogL Unrestricted LogL -82.20697 130 -72.86586 123 Unrestricted Test Equation: Dependent Variable: Z Method: ML - Binary Probit (Newton-Raphson / Marquardt steps) Sample: 1 137 Included observations: 137 49

Convergence achieved after 8 iterations Coefficient covariance computed using observed Hessian Variable Coefficient Std. Error z-Statistic Prob. C -4.336288 4.061070 -1.067770 0.2856 A4 0.020972 0.070047 0.299404 0.7646 A8 -0.137746 0.069381 -1.985343 0.0471 A10 -0.516119 1.318229 -0.391525 0.6954 A18 -0.423588 0.574025 -0.737927 0.4606 A19 0.474285 0.187004 2.536224 0.0112 A13 -2.75E-07 3.19E-07 -0.860782 0.3894 A1 9.14E-08 3.27E-08 2.794718 0.0052 A2 0.057554 0.069355 0.829842 0.4066 A3 -0.068865 0.067075 -1.026687 0.3046 A5 -0.009860 0.077054 -0.127961 0.8982 A6 4.279251 3.510297 1.219056 0.2228 A7 0.405184 1.317319 0.307582 0.7584 A9 4.721092 3.906978 1.208375 0.2269 McFadden R-squared 0.178801 Mean dependent var 0.649635 S.D. dependent var 0.478835 S.E. of regression 0.452691 Akaike info criterion 1.268115 Sum squared resid 25.20624 Schwarz criterion 1.566507 Log likelihood -72.86586 Hannan-Quinn criter. 1.389374 Deviance 145.7317 Restr. deviance 177.4622 Restr. log likelihood -88.73110 LR statistic 31.73049 Avg. log likelihood -0.531868 Prob(LR statistic) 0.002633 Obs with Dep=0 39 Total obs 137 Obs with Dep=1 98 Хавсралт №5. Нэг алхамт динамик панел загварModel 11: 1-step dynamic panel, using 137 observationsIncluded 137 cross-sectional unitsH-matrix as per Ox/DPDDependent variable: ROI Coefficient Std. Error z p-value −2.0909 0.0753const −0.00060802 0.00055735 50

A4 0.619706 0.354251 −1.7493 0.0802 *A8 0.00225032 0.00641912 −2.3506 0.0259 **A10 −0.00646777 0.00929069 −3.6962 0.0013 **A13 −0.435718 0.089349 −4.8766 <0.0001 ***A18 -0.0405483 0.0158135 2.5642 0.0103 **A19 0.065278 0.0238465 −2.7374 0.0062 ***Sum squared resid 1.977755 S.E. of regression 0.090589Хавсралт №6. Weighted profile least squares estimation panel загвараар үр дүнModel 1: WLS, using 137 observationsIncluded 137 cross-sectional unitsDependent variable: ROAWeights based on per-unit error variances Coefficient Std. Error t-ratio p-value 0.00459007 1.0147 0.31385const 0.00465751 0.024023 1.4527 0.15092 0.0399977 1.9462 0.05576du_1 0.0348972 0.004656 -0.5240 0.60195 0.0091734 -1.3082 0.19520du_2 0.0778455 1.82482 1.0072 0.31739 * 0.00463402 -3.2048 0.00206 ***du_3 -0.00243994 0.0676347 0.7772 0.43974 0.0230016 0.7845 0.43548 ***du_4 -0.012001 4.78167 1.0150 0.31371 *** 0.067462 -0.9950 0.32325du_5 1.83804 0.00459031 -1.0250 0.30899 0.0107904 -3.7586 0.00036du_6 -0.0148512 0.0391584 -2.6891 0.00900 0.0680429 0.3463 0.73019du_7 0.0525648 0.100254 -0.0174 0.98621 0.124045 0.9768 0.33213du_8 0.0180445 0.00577157 0.3043 0.76181 0.0257237 0.9259 0.35777du_9 4.85335 0.00465206 -0.5118 0.61047 0.896052 -1.0202 0.31124du_10 -0.067126 0.0300075 -1.1658 0.24776du_11 -0.00470511du_12 -0.0405566du_13 -0.105301du_14 0.0235633du_15 -0.00173959du_16 0.121166du_17 0.0017564du_18 0.0238176du_19 -0.00238076du_20 -0.914168du_21 -0.0349832 51

du_22 -0.0505285 0.0547778 -0.9224 0.35957 *du_23 0.0915738 0.0948808 0.9651 0.33789 ***du_24 0.635895 0.341514 1.8620 0.06693 ***du_25 -0.118538 0.112287 -1.0557 0.29486du_26 0.00104484 0.00780459 0.1339 0.89390 *du_27 0.00839645 0.0822226 0.1021 0.91896 *du_28 0.0311239 0.0258446 1.2043 0.23266 ***du_29 -0.0301972 0.00494103 -6.1115 <0.00001 *du_30 -0.0211557 0.0176146 -1.2010 0.23390du_31 -0.0109456 0.012384 -0.8839 0.37989du_32 0.00100498 0.0277084 0.0363 0.97117du_33 0.0044772 0.0357618 0.1252 0.90074du_34 -0.360324 0.323965 -1.1122 0.26996du_35 -0.432063 0.0678396 -6.3689 <0.00001du_36 0.0127869 0.0157032 0.8143 0.41832du_37 -0.00172416 0.00505542 -0.3411 0.73412du_38 -0.00463475 0.00459012 -1.0097 0.31621du_39 0.0564288 0.0469835 1.2010 0.23391du_40 -0.00234745 0.00503331 -0.4664 0.64243du_41 0.00299642 0.00882773 0.3394 0.73533du_42 -0.0185365 0.0440118 -0.4212 0.67496du_43 -0.0351824 0.0304211 -1.1565 0.25152du_44 0.0478635 0.047088 1.0165 0.31301du_45 0.00724336 0.00467401 1.5497 0.12585du_46 -0.112556 0.0654122 -1.7207 0.08985du_47 -0.00665359 0.00499359 -1.3324 0.18717du_48 0.0180678 0.00949692 1.9025 0.06134du_49 0.0910265 0.0943785 0.9645 0.33822du_50 -0.0244312 0.0585341 -0.4174 0.67771du_51 -0.0299986 0.0397595 -0.7545 0.45315du_52 0.0834459 0.083339 1.0013 0.32024du_53 -0.00470747 0.0180977 -0.2601 0.79556du_54 -0.0768161 0.0135102 -5.6858 <0.00001du_55 -0.0616889 0.539179 -0.1144 0.90925du_56 -0.0335003 0.0267431 -1.2527 0.21462du_57 0.105732 0.0628813 1.6815 0.09726…. …. …. …. ….…. …. …. …. ….…. …. …. …. …. 52

…. …. …. …. …. **…. …. …. …. …. **du_133 0.0201125 0.0248015 0.8109 0.42023du_134 -0.00463734 0.00459011 -1.0103 0.31594du_135 -0.00455634 0.00459115 -2.9924 0.02451du_136 -0.00465751 0.00459007 -1.0147 0.80135du_137 -0.00462259 0.0045902 -3.0071 0.00748Statistics based on the weighted data:Sum squared resid 132.0013 S.E. of regression 1.393268 Adjusted R-squared 0.846911R-squared 0.922888 P-value(F) 1.16e-20 Akaike criterion 517.8927F 12.14684 Hannan-Quinn 598.3794Log-likelihood -190.9463 S.D. dependent var 0.915969 S.E. of regression 0.916319Schwarz criterion 715.9532Statistics based on the original data:Mean dependent var 0.086926Sum squared resid 57.09550 53