Bachelor Thesis Example

BACHELORTHESISEXAMPLE OD EBSJ CE CRTI PI VT IEO N

STRATEGIC ALLIANCESAND KNOWLEDGETRANSFERS IN CHINAABSTRACTBased on a combined methods of approach in drawing an openand closed question in an online questionnaire, this thesis looksinto exploring knowledge transfers currently undertaken byChinese companies as part of their international strategictechniques. Looking into the importance of these internationalstrategic alliances in the economy of China. This thesis also seeksin understanding what the key challenges are involvingknowledge transfers in this setting, what they look like, and howknowledge may be used in a way that sustains competitivesuccess.INTRODUCTIONThis chapter outlines the main research context, introducing somekey concepts. To understand the importance and nature ofknowledge transfers, this chapter also defines the meaning ofknowledge that draws on both explicit and tacit forms. Moreover,it also introduces to the readers the increasing importance ofinternational strategic alliances, primarily focusing on theChinese economy (Carlson, 2006). Recognizing that there is aconnection between competitive success and strategic alliances inthe literature, this research looks on the Chinese market tounderstand what these alliances look like, as well as the nature ofknowledge transfers, along with the particular challenges whichexist in this rapidly booming market. This information is requiredto assess the overall extent in which Chinese companies can usethe knowledge obtained in order to strengthen their position inthe race.

STRATEGIC ALLIANCESAND KNOWLEDGETRANSFERS IN CHINALITERATURE REVIEWThis chapter highlights the theoretical basis for the research thatis aligned to the objectives of the research presented. Thischapter further introduces the primary theoretical concepts, aswell as the empirical studies which underpin the arena in whichthe research sits.The point of this exploratory research aims to understand thedepth in which knowledge transfers currently exist in a number ofstrategic alliances, as well as the extent in which these underpinthe competitive success. In order for this aspect to be examined,the meaning of knowledge, as well as the nature of knowledgetransfers should be understood first and foremost.At a basic level, these knowledge transfer refer to an exchange ofknowledge, which may either be tacit or explicit, and used inorder to further improve learning within the firm. Theseknowledge transfers are positioned increasingly as being highlyessential as a result of their being treated as a capacity thatallows organizations to achieve the position of superiority if suchcapacity is achieved and focused on (Moran & Philips, 2001).Different interpretations regarding knowledge and knowledgetransfers are usually generalized and often interpreted as beingambiguous. This results to discussions regarding knowledge beingcoupled with terms including experience, understanding andintuition which, even though useful, may fail to appreciate theessence of the context. Knowledge may also be both implicitwhich may be based on an experience, and explicit where theinformation is translated and depicted easily. 

STRATEGIC ALLIANCESAND KNOWLEDGETRANSFERS IN CHINASUMMARY AND RESEARCH GAPSThe review of literature presented in the next chapter drawing onthe importance of knowledge transfers, and still recognizing howlittle attention had been specifically directed towards the natureof these knowledge transfers in strategic alliances. This oftenresults in an empirical study was performed so as to identify whatthe exchanges actually look like, but also in understanding howthese knowledge transfers may be facilitated because of thestrong empirical linked between innovation, knowledge transfers,as well as competitive advantage. A foundation and starting pointfor this thesis was to further gain clarifications on the concepts,moving towards a point of exact measurement (Molley, 2002).ReferencesCarlson, E. (2006). How do social and special proximity impact theflow of knowledge? Evidences coming from patent data. UrbanEconomics Journal, 45(3), 345-367.Molley, H. (2002). Social research and development methods:Quantitative and qualitative approaches. California: Sade Press.Moran, R., & Philips, E. (2001). Strategic modularity in knowledgetransfers: performance and innovation implications. BusinessResearch of Journal, 34(3), 23-25.