1807303_TQF 5

1 TQF 5 Course Report This document is a report by each instructor of a given course and is submitted at the end of each semester. The report presents an overall outcome of the course in the light of its scope, lesson plans and objectives stated in the course specifications. In case of any significant deviation from the plan, the report shall also recommend how the course should be improved when next offered. This report also presents the number of students enrolled in and completing each section; the student’s final grades; course management problems; concerns over facility availability; analysis of students’, program chairperson’s and/or external appraiser’s evaluation; and opinions of graduate’s employers. Course improvement plans and recommendations for the program chairperson are also included. Four Sections of Course Report Section 1 General Information Section 2 Consistency between Lesson Plans and Actual Lectures Section 3 Summary of Course Implementation Section 4 Improvement Plans

2 Course Specification Name of University Mae Fah Luang University School Health Science Program Bachelor of Science in Occupational Health and Safety Section 1 General Information 1. Course Code and Course Title 1807303 Principles of Toxicology 2. Credit 3 (3-0-6) 3. Program and Type of Course Program  Program (please specify) Bachelor of Science in Occupational Health and Safety  Many Program Type of Course  General Education  Specific Required Courses / Subject Group Major Required Course  Other Courses (please specify)  Thesis / Dissertation 4. Course Coordinator and Course Instructor Course Coordinator Course Instructor Name and Surname   1. Asst.Prof.Dr.Kowit Nambunmee 5. Semester/ Student’s Year of Study Academic Year 2020 Semester 1 Year of study 3 6. Pre-requisite (if required)  None  Yes, As follows

3 7. Co-requisite (if required)  None  Yes, As follows 8. Campus  Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai  Other (please specify)

4 Section 2 Consistency between Lesson Plans and Actual Lectures 1. Lectures Do Not Cover All the Topics of the Lesson Plan Specified in TQF 3 Topic(s) that Not Follow Reason Solution the Lesson Plan Specified in TQF 3 - - None 2. Learning Achievement as Specified in TQF 3 2.1 Factors that influence the process of teaching and learning Teaching and Learning Methods/ Assessment to Achieve Learning Outcomes Learning Specify teaching Specify assessment Learning Outcome Achievement methodology methods suggestion 1. Domain of Ethics and Morality Achieved Not Teaching Suggestion Assessment Suggestion 1.1 To be punctual Achieved Methodology (If any) Methods (If any) (1.1) √ - Explain the Evaluate the - 2. Domain of importance of group Knowledge 2.1 To explain core being performance by knowledge of punctual individual health and safety in the workplace - Group members and and industry including health discussion lecturer and safety of individual workers √ - Case Study - Midterm and - or professionals and must be able - Practise Final to explain the core concept of - Gamification Examination handling - Group - Evaluate the Discussion performance in class exercises

5 Learning Specify teaching Specify assessment methodology Learning Outcome Achievement Teaching Suggestion methods suggestion Methodology (If any) emergencies such Achieved Not Assessment Suggestion as the concept of Achieved contingency plan Methods (If any) (2.1) 3. Domain of √ - Assignment - Test Cognitive Skills - Report - Presentation 3.1 To analyse the - Case study - Evaluate the particular situations - Mind Mapping performance in when individuals, class exercises entrepreneurs or industrials √ - Group - Report - performance facing assignment performance unexpected - Role-play - Presentation situations of health - Group - Paper piece and safety and discussion - Test utilising the - Gamification relevant knowledge for the solutions (3.1) 3.2 To apply the core knowledge in solving problem skills and contribute to integrated working performance related to Fundamental of Occupational Health and Safety in workplaces(3.2) 4. Domain of Interpersonal Skills and Responsibility 4.1 To have a high responsibility of individual roles and assigned tasks (4.1)

6 Learning Specify teaching Specify assessment methodology Learning Outcome Achievement Teaching Suggestion methods suggestion 4.2 To be able to work Methodology (If any) Achieved Not Assessment Suggestion as a good Achieved teamwork and Methods (If any) comply with effective leadership and fellows (4.2) 5. Domain of √ - Group - Report - Numerical Analysis, assignment performance Communication and - Role-play - Presentation Information - Group - Paper piece Technology Skills discussion - Test 5.1 To have a good Gamification comprehension of both Thai and English in order to deliver an effective communication including listening, speaking, reading and writing, then utilise the effective tools for conducting the presentation (5.1) 2.2 Supporting Facilities System for Teaching and Learning such as classroom, meeting room, laboratory room, library, self-study room, etc. Facilities Problem and /or Recommendation

7 2.3 Educational Support System such as Learning Management System (LMS), E-learning System, IT System, Technical Assistant System, others related to Teaching and Learning, etc. Educational Support System Problem and /or Recommendations Google Class Room Microsoft Teams LMS 2.4 Environment for Supporting Teaching and Learning such as cleanliness, safeness, decency, etc. Environment Problem and /or Recommendations 2.5 Other (if any) Problem and /or Recommendations Please specify ...............

8 Section 3 Summary of Course Implementation 1. Number of students enrolled 47 students (as of the last day of course addition/withdrawal) 2. Number of students retained at the end of the semester 47 students 3. Grade distribution Grade Frequency Percentage A 10 21.28 B+ 18 38.30 B 13 27.66 C+ 6 12.77 C D+ D F I S U Total 42 100.00 4. Assessment Strategy by Students 1. Average Grade 4.76 Suggestion for Teaching and Learning Improvement - To arrange activities of a paper piece to point that allow students facing stressful and pressure when collecting the points into score accumulation. - Students are more enjoyable in a group study.

9 5. Lecturer’s Suggestion 1. Paper piece to point is one of the alternatives for example, whether or not students choose an oral test or paper piece to point depending on their individual needs. Students would like to do a paper piece to point instead of doing an oral test because they face difficulties. So next semester, there must be more explanation for selecting activities and the process. It perhaps collects the information by the students for track selection depending on their individual needs at the beginning of semester. 2. To remain conducting group activities, maximum at 7 people per individual group. 6. Verification of Learning Outcomes Verification of Method Conclusion Referring to written information in TQF 2 and The suggestions for improvement in moral TQF 3. Presentation for the learning results, and ethics areas instead of utilising PLO the learning methods and process. It arranges standard and it utilises the central academic the evaluation and approval by academic evaluation procedure instead of designing the committees of the faculty and submits to the course by individual major. university as following the internal academic procedure

10 Section 4 Improvement Plans 1. Summary of Course Development/ Improvement Implementation as Specified in TQF 3 Section 2 No. 3 Course Development/ Improvement Plans Summary of Implementation -  Improved (specify)  Improved but not complete (specify reason) ................................................................ ..................................................................  Not improved (specify reason) ................................................................ ..................................................................  Improved (specify)  Improved but not complete (specify reason) ................................................................ ..................................................................  Not improved (specify reason) ................................................................ .................................................................. 2. Suggestion for Teaching and Learning Improvement - Provide the rubric scores for each assignment 3. Suggestion for Program Chairperson -

11 Name of Course Coordinator/ Course Advisor Signature.................................................. Date 22 January 2021 (Asst.Prof.Dr.Kowit Nambunmee) Name of Program Chairperson 1. Signature.................................................. Date 22 January 2021 (Prapamon Seeprasert) 2. Signature.................................................. Date 22 January 2021 (Kowit Nambunmee) 3. Signature.................................................. Date 22 January 2021 (Sitang Kongkratoke) 4. Signature.................................................. Date 22 January 2021 (Anchalee Katramee) 5. Signature.................................................. Date 22 January 2021 (Nicharuch Panjaphothiwat) Date of Submission .........22 January 2021........