Important Announcement
PubHTML5 Scheduled Server Maintenance on (GMT) Sunday, June 26th, 2:00 am - 8:00 am.
PubHTML5 site will be inoperative during the times indicated!

Home Explore คู่มือปฏิบัติงาน APACC ปี 2564

คู่มือปฏิบัติงาน APACC ปี 2564

Published by supinya.sathuwan, 2021-06-29 03:10:15

Description: คู่มือปฏิบัติงาน ปี 2564 (SCAN เล่มสมบูรณ์)

Search

Read the Text Version

Criterion VI - Other Resources 38 Point Indicator Annex 4 Indicator 6.1 - Financial Resources 4 4 6.1.1 Operational Budget (Working Capital/Recurrent 4 4 Cost/Operational Budget) 4 G'ff11'V'lf11'a1~fo~\\PIG'f'a'a-:Ji.J'U'a~mrui1Lil'wnu 24 6.1.2 Developmental Budget (infrastructure, tools 4 and equipment, HRD) G'ffl1'V'lf11'a1~-!i.J~\\PIG'f'a'a 4 4 -:Ji.J'U'a~1!1W'1T\\.,'1{i.J fl 1 'a'WWJ'l.11 6.1.3 Annual Budget Increment [average of last 3 24 years] r11Lu~cJ6Ut1~f11'aL~1J;['U\"lltl~~i.J'l..b::;mrutJd::;~1tl vfl~fo Lu~cJ 3 tl ..I 6.1.4 External Financial Audit fl111Jf;1\"1Ja-:Jf11'a(P)'a1\\JG'feli.J ~1'U rm L~'LI\\l 1 nV1ti1 m 1'Ufl 1ffw ei n 6.1.5 Contribution of Income generating fund to the annual budget for institutional development 1f11'a~\\PlG'f'a'a'a1cJ1~\\11flbfl'a-:Jf11'aVl1'a1cJ1~L\"U1'a11J 'LI ~i.Ju• t'a~\\1o1u~IL'V..,'Jlel f11'a'V\"'l'WJ'U1 6.1.6 Budget Preparation and Planning 1f11'aii~1'!.J'j11J\"1Jel~c'.h cJi.J~'Vl1'a 'Wf11'a11~LLt:-J'U i\\Pl'1'a'a Indicator 6.2 - Physical Facilities 6.2.1 Area and Accessibility of Institution (Polytechnic, College, School, Center) 6.2.2 Classrooms 25 ... 1•\"1J'U1\\Plil1Vl'a~1'U\"1J el~'V,,l,el-:J L\"'a\"c.J'U'V..II L~uIu uIVl11!\"1,,J,elf1o1Vl'U~ 6.2.3 Furniture fl'a,.lltU'1f11'aL~c.J'Uf11'a'1el'U611Vlfo~ei-:iL~c.J'U i,1L'U 'LILt.J1,rn.J\"ll€lf11'Vl'U~

39 Indicator Annex Point 6.2.4 Labs, Workshops, and other facilities including 26, 27, 28 12 maintenance management \"HeJ-:J'VlW\\l;leM \"Hel-:J'U~'\\J~fl1'~ 24 lll;l~t.l,Jmufoh~ 'l iJm1U~'V!1';i~W\\fn';i{,11lJ\"Ueln1'V!\\.!'11 4 LWcM1'11 4 8 Indicator 6.3 - Library 4 4 6.3.1 Library Resources including Learning 29 6 Resource Centers (print and non-print, 30 30 journals, magazines, newspapers, 31 4 instructional materials) '1Jl1'W\"l.lel-:J\"Ht1~'1l.,lWI 4 f,',l'Utl~e1 m1Pi m.11 LthJ1tlml.l'!leJfl1'V!\\.!'11 6.3.2 Resource Sharing with other Libraries 8 ,11u1u~e1-:i'1l.,lW1tu~ilm1l.l~1iiiie11i'Vl-r'Wm m~1ii nu .6.3.3 Library Space and Facilities ~'l.!~\"l.leN~el-:J'1~WILU'l.!1't.J ,, {,11lJ'!Jeln1'V!'lJWI 11i1i~1tUU~~el1'l.!1c.lf111l.1'1t'1\\1n 6.3.4 Library Management System 1tuun11u~'V!11~W1n11~e:i~ai1,W1il'\\J1t~'Vlfin1'W 6.3.5 Budget for the Operation of Library an1vm 11~W1'111~u't.J1tmru1\"H~eJ-:J'1l.1'11 ' 6.3.6 Library Staff Quantity and Educational •. 0 1'l.!1'lJLLl;l t fl, un, c::r. \"l.l el~ L !LI 11.dt.1 '1l.,l WI Qua liflcation s \"il lnl \"il 1'V!'l.!TVl'V!el~ 1LU'l.! 'LJ{,11l.l\"Uelf11Vl'l.!'11 Indicator 6.4 - Tools and Equipment 6.4.1 Tools, Equipment, and Accessories (by 32 program) .d d ,J tf rnsndnumsaeu ~ mru Lf11e:i-:iiie1 tluLL~f\\~Vlin'1{,l';iL 1'\\J{,111J\"Uel fl1'Vl'U~ 'IJ 6.4.2 Maintenance of tools and equipment '1n1'Wn11'U11,-:Jfn'l!f1 Lfl~miJe1e1,'i.Jmru

40 Indicator Annex Point 4 Indicator 6.5 - Information and Communications Technology 6.5.1 Computers and Required Software 33 6.5.2 Multimedia Center or Other Information Technology 4 Facilities a.n1'WLLi;i~'lh~aV15.f11'W6llel..:JP!'U6l!i;i~L~cJLLi;i~ 4 \"U 4 6.5.3 Maintenance of information technology equipment 16 4 rrrnha.n1-wrn1u11,..:i{n~1eJ,'l.J VlflL 'ULi;i~G'l11am VIP! 4 8 6.5.4 ICT Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff (number, 34 110 qualifications and experience) fliLL'1~L~1'Vltl1~ th. 11~1'Ua11G'l'ULviP1ii,11'U1'ULLi;l~ fl, rum.1u~L 'l.Jv1111iieJ n1'V!'Uv1 Indicator 6.6 - Repair and Maintenance Management 6.6.1 Maintenance of Workshops/Laboratories '1.f11'Wf111~vlfl11Lbi;i~'U11..:l{tl~1 ~el-:J'Ulj'U~f111 ~el-:JVlvl'1el-:J 6.6.2 Safety measures and signage '1.f11'Wf111~vltl113.J1vl1tl11fl113.J'Ui;ielv!.llcJLLi;i~thm1qJqJ~tl~UJ Total

Criterion VII - Support to Students 41 Point Indicator Annex 4 Indicator 7.1 - Guidance and Career Counselling 4 7.1.1 Guidance and Career Counselling System (Office, Staff 4 4 to Student Ratio, Feedback System) 4 4 11::'U'U rrrsu'U:: LL'U1 LL\"1::1~fl1'U~ mmU'U 'LJ(,11lJ-ii'an1Vf'U(,) 2 8 1'LIL~el..:JG'lm'U~ ,i1'U1'UL~1Vf'U1~ LL\"1::1::'U'Uf11)~e)i;11'j 4 4 Indicator 7.2 - Student Services 35 ,36 4 7.2.1 Student Services Staff to Student Ratio 37 37 1am1?i1'UL~1Vf'U1~ LL'U:: LL'U1~a,i1'U1'Utl'n L~fJ'U~ Ltl'U 'LJ(,11lJ -ifel fl1Vl't.Wt 7.2.2 Student Recruitment System 11::'U'U n 11-r'Ual!F11LL\"1 ::~(,) L~antl'nfim~n Ltl'U tJml.l.ifa fl1Vf'U(,) 7.2.4 Scholarship and Financial Aids 38 39 e)(,})1?11Wi11'U1'UUf1 L~fJ'Um~{'UV1'Uf111Pi mn1'U1:: fJ:: L1\"11 40 ' :;'1d I 41 3 uVli:.J1'UlJ1 7.2.5 Resources for co-curricular and extra-curricular .Activities f111'iil\\,!Vl-r'V'lfJ1mLviam1'iil\\,Jfl,Jf111lJLG'l1lJVf;f1am 7.2.6 Co-Curricular and Extra-Curricular Activities n,i . 1am~ru:: f111~\\,I m1lJUWf1el'U LL\"1 ::LG'l1lJVfaf1G'l\\,l 1~ LU'U ti 7.2.7 Employment Rate in relevant field one (1) year after graduation uam1m1i1..:i1'U'V11\\,l)..:!Vf~m~m-ii'a..:i1 .a1'lJ1~,1'U'lJa..:i~,1'Uf111~m~n1'U 1 uV1;..:i,1'U 7.2.8 Involvement of Students in Decision Making related to Students' Welfare m1i1?11'U~1lJ'lle:J..:J'Uf1L~fJ'U

42 Indicator Annex Point 42 8 7.2.10 Health, Sports, and Other Social Services for 46 Students 6ifl~ru~m~il?l'U1fl1~~1'l..lG'l\"ll.f11yj n\\41 LL\"~'\\J~fl1~ 50 ' i~r11J1~tl'm~f.lu~Luu1u~11J.ifvn1,.,,u~

43 -=========:=:::=====================~:::::==::::::==: : : :======-- APPENDIX I SELF-STUDY FORM Section 1. The Profile of the Institution 1. Information about the Institution Name of Institution Parent Institution Country Address Telephone No. Fax No. E-mail Website Social Media 2. Status of the Institution [please tick (..I)] ( ) Autonomous University/College ( ) Constituent College ( ) Affiliated College ( ) Polytechnic/Technical College ( ) Technical School/Technical CentersNocational Training Institute ( ) Department/Unit ( ) Autonomous University/College -a:;:::::=======:=:=====iiiiiim; ,; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;. ;.;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:;=====::::::===~==- APACC Accreditation Manual -65-

44 -~====================================:aa- 3. Law/Ordinance that created the Institution, and date of establishment 4. Information about the Head of the Institution Name Position Country Address Telephone No. Fax No. E-mail 5. Information for Communication about Other Important Officials (at least four) Name Position Tel. No. Fax No. E-Mail 6. Any Quality Management System adopted by the institution? Please specify. APACC Accreditation Manual -66-

45 -..:::==========================::::::: : : : :=======:. .=- 7. A. Vision of the Institution 8. Mission Statement C. Goals 8. Area of the Institution (in acres) Address Total Area Built-up Area 9. Other Campuses of the Institution Name of Campus 10. Classification of current TVET programs offered [please tick (v\")] Degree Undergraduate (UG) ( ) Bachelor Postgraduate (PG) ( ) Master's ( ) Doctoral Diploma ( ) Diploma ( ) Postgraduate Diploma Certificate ( ) Certificate Course ( ) Twinning Programs Others, please specify --======--===========:='.:=================:::::=- APACC Accreditation Manual -67-

46 --====::;:~~:::::::::==::: ======================~- Section 2. Criteria-Based Data and Self-Assessment Criterion 1 - Governance and Management The institution's system of governance and management is sufficient to manage existing operations, and to respond to development and change. Indicator 1.1 - Decision Making and Management System 1.1.1 Strategic Plan, Yearly Plan of Operation, and Implementation Specification Please tick Maximum=4 POINTS (,/) 0 Institution's Evaluation No Strategic Plan 1 Prepared and approved strategic 2 plan for recent 5 years (including running year) 3 4 Communicated the approved strategic plan (required components) to stakeholders (internal and external per need) Prepared yearly plan of operation (YPO) / Annual Plan (AP) based on approved Strategic Plan Implemented programs are based on YPO/AP Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 1. Strategic Management of Institution • Strategic Plan • Evidences of Dissemination of Strategic Plan Components [e.g. in posters, letters, website, handbook, employees' manual, newsletter] • Annual Plan • Feedback from the Stakeholders _,: ;:;:;==================:::=~============-- APACC Accreditation Manual -68-

47 --=============================:;;=====::::.::==1- 1.1.2 Participation of Institution's Decision Making Body in Policy/Plan Formulation Specification Please tick Maximum= 2 POINTS (,/) Institution's 0 Evaluation 1 No participation 2 75% and below participation More than 75% participation Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 2. Composition of the Institution's Management Board/ Decision Making Body • Records of attendance • Minutes of Meetings 1.1.3 Conduct of Management Board Meeting ;, Please tick Maximum =4 POINTS (,/) Institution's Specification 0 Evaluation 1 Never 2 Once a year 3 Two times a year 4 Three times a year Four times a year Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 3. List of Meetings of the Institution's Management Board (for the last 3 years) • Minutes of the Meetings • Attendance Record of the Meetings • Yearly Plan of Operation/Annual Plan -1====::::::===:::5iii i i i ii i i i ii i i i i ii i i io.i=================- APACC Accreditation Manual -69-

48 -1=============:;;::==================~- 1.1.4 Quality Management System [Plan, Implement, Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E), and Feedback] Specification Please tick Maximum =4 POINTS (./) 0 Institution's No Quality Management System 4 Evaluation Quality Management System in Place Data Required and Means of Verification: • Quality Manual • Operations Manual • Procedures Manual • Customer Feedback • Corrective/Preventive Action Reports • Results of Internal Quality Audits 1.1.5 Internal Quality Audit Specification Please tick Maximum=4 POINTS (Frequency of IQA) (./) Institution's 0 Evaluation Once in more than three years or never 1 Once in three years 2 Once in two years Once a year 3 Twice a year 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: • Quality Manual • Operations Manual • Procedures Manual • Customer Feedback · • Memoranda on Internal Quality Audits • Minutes of Meetings • Results of Internal Quality Audits • Corrective/Preventive Action Reports -==================:::~======~==::====-­ APACC Accreditation Manual -70-

49 -m::=====: '.:'.===========================1- 1.1.6 Academic Committee/Board Specification Please tick Maximum=4 POINTS (,/) Institution's None 0 Evaluation Formed Academic Board 1 Organized Regular Meeting and 2 Consultation with the Board Members 3 Implementation of the Board 4 Decisions Feedback and Suggestion Mechanism Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 4. Composition of Academic Committee/Board Annex 5. Involvement of Academic Committees/Board in Decision Making • Terms of Reference (TOR) of Academic Board • Minutes of Meetings • Sample of the Activities performed based on Board Decisions • Flowchart of the Feedback Management System ....1-=:::::::;;:;;;===::'.:'.: =====--------------i i i i i ------;;.;;.;=======:;:==-- APACC Accreditation Manual -71-

50 ---===========::================:;::::::::;;::::===::::::::::::::===- Indicator 1.2 - Program and Budgeting 1.2.1 Program Planning and Budget Allocation last fiscal year Please tick POINTS (,/) Specification Maximum=8 Institution's Evaluation No Annual Program and Budgeting Plan 0 Prepared Annual Program and 2 Budget Plan 4 Implemented according to the 6 Plan 8 Installed Monitoring and Evaluation System Created Feedback System for next plan Note: Program means listed activities in the operational plan Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 6: Implementation Status of Programs and Budget • Program and Budgeting Plan • Operational Plan • Monitoring and Evaluation Report ....~:=::::::::============~==:::::::::::=========-;;;;;....;..;;;;.;.;:==:;;;;:==:::::::====-- APACC Accreditation Manual -72-

51 1.2.2 Effectiveness and Efficiency of Program and Budgeting last Fiscal Year Specification Please tick Maximum =4 POINTS (,/) 0 Institution's Evaluation Less than 50% program 1 completion and budget utilization 2 51 - 65% program completion and budget utilization 3 66 - 80% program completion 4 and budget utilization 81 - 95% program completion and budget utilization Above 95% program completion and budget utilization Note: If the budget expenditure percentage is less than program completion within 15%, it is acceptable. Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 7. Program Completion Report • Annual Plan/Operational Plan • AnnualReport • Financial Statement • Program Completion Report • Monitoring and Evaluation Report ---========: =: :~===========:==:;;.;;;;;;:==========­ APACC Accreditation Manual -73-

52 --=====::;:===:: ~===========================-- 1.2.3 Management of Income Generating Fund POINTS S pacification Please tick Maximum =4 Institution's (Utilization Percentage of (,/) Evaluation Income Generating Funds for Institutional Development Activities) Less than 15% 0 15-35% 1 36-55% 2 56- 75% 3 Above 75% 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 8. Financial Statement of Income Generating Fundis for the last three years • List of Development Activities utilizing IGF • Report of IGFs • Operational Plan for current fiscal year • IGF Implementation Guidelines 1.2.4 Financial and Inventory Auditing Specification Please tick Maximum =4 POINTS (Frequency) (,/) 0 Institution's 2 Evaluation Biennial 4 Annual Semi Annual Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 9. Audit and Procurement Management • Audit Plan • Procurement Plan • Inventory Record • Audit Report --===--~~======::: =====~;=: :::::~::==================:::­ APACC Accreditation Manual -74-

53 -i==================;::: =============- 1.2.5 Records Keeping and Documentation (Archiving, Filing, e-database) Please tick POINTS (,/) Specification Maximum =4 Institution's Evaluation No Procedure/Guideline 0 Records keeping and documentation using hard copy only 2 Records keeping and documentation using hard copy and digitized 4 version Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 10. List of Major Records • Filing System • Records Management System • Report on types of Incoming and Outgoing Communications • Method of Records Disposal / Archiving -- APACC Accreditation Manual -75-

54 -,=====================:::=:::;:;;; ;;;=:=:;;;;::::::::~==::'.'.========- Criterion 2 - Teaching and Learning The institution has a clearly defined mission, and has adopted academic/ technical/ vocational programs with set objectives and learning outcomes at appropriate levels; and has effective mechanism of delivery and testing/assessing to ensure success in meeting these objectives and enable students to achieve the intended outcomes. Indicator 2.1 - Strategic Link of Learning Objectives 2.1.1 Institutional Strategic Directions vs. National Education Policies/Targets Alignment with National Education Specification PoliciesITargets Institution's Evaluation Vision (Please tick ) Mission Yes (4) No (0) Goals Student Enrollment (Access and Equity) Teaching and Learning Opportunities for Students (Equal opportunities) Program Focus based on government priorities MAXIMUM POINTS: 24 Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 11. Teaching and Learning Systems • National policy on education affecting TVET Systems • Institutional Strategic Plan • List of Program Offerings • Government Policy Guidelines • List of benchmarked institutions • Recent Labor Market Information -- APACC Accreditation Manual -76-

55 -1.:=; :=:;;:::==========: : : :=:::::===================­ lndicator 2.2 - Curriculum 2.2.1 Curriculum Development and Revision System Specification Please tick Points (,/) No prepared curriculum based on national Maximum=4 Institution's competency standards Evaluation Prepared curriculum based on national competency standards 0 Use of curriculum for instruction (teaching and learning materials development and delivery) 1 Conducted Evaluation/Assessment of students based on curriculum 2 Developed feedback system for curriculum revision 3 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: • Current curriculum • Flowchart of Curriculum Development Process • Sample Summative Assessment Tools • Inventory Record of Tools and Equipment 2.2.2 Percentage of Competency Standards/Courses reviewed in the last 3 years Specification Please tick Maximum=4 Points (,/) Institution's 20% or less 0 Evaluation 21-40% 1 41-60% 2 61 -80% 3 81 % and above 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • List of Reviewed Curriculum • Minutes of meeting on curriculum review • Record of attendance ==~===========::========- APACC Accreditation Manual -77-

56 -;:;::===============::::::============:;;:;~;:;;; :::::::;;::=~~~::=::==:.._- 2.2.3 Involvement of Stakeholders in Curriculum Development and Revision Frequency of Involvement Please tick(,/) Specification Never As per When By initiation Regular Institution's (0) policy required of higher Undertaking Evaluation authorities (1) (2) (3) (4) Enterprises (Business, Industry, SMEs) Teaching and Non- Teaching Staff Alumni Subject Experts MAXIMUM POINTS: 16 Data Required and Means of Verification: • Memorandum inviting special participation of teaching staff to review and revise curriculum • Proposals written and submitted to proper authorities for curriculum revision • List of Participants in Curriculum Development Process 2.2.4 Components of the Curriculum Specification Points Please tick Iv') Institution's 1 Yes No (0) Evaluation Basic Competencies 1 Core Competencies/Elective MAXIMUM POINTS: 4 Competencies 1 Soft Skills (attitude, behavior, 0.5 communication, etc.) 0.5 Entreoreneurshio Sustainability/Greening Comoetencies Data Required and Means of Verification: • Current curriculum -~:'.=:=====================::::::: ; ; ;;;;;;;;;;;======::;::=- APACC Accreditation Manual -78-

57 -1=::::::::;:;::;:::::::::::::::::::::=:::::::::::::::::::::::::==========::::;;;:;:::::====::::::~~=:1111• Indicator 2.3 - Instructional Guides 2.3.1 Lesson/Session Plan Please tick Points (v\") Specification Maximum=4 Institution's Evaluation No Lesson/Session Plan Developed 0 Less than 40% of teachers 1 developed Lesson/Session Plan based on curriculum 2 41-60% of teachers developed 3 Lesson/Session Plan based on curriculum 4 61-80% of teachers developed Lesson/Session Plan based on curriculum Above 80% of teachers developed Lesson/Session Plan based on curriculum Data Required and Means of Verification: • List of teaching staff with subjects for the last 3 years • Sample Lesson/Session Plan • Teacher Teaching Methodology Observation Tools -1===~==================~==:===========::::::::::===- APACC Accreditation Manual -79-

58 -1====::::::;;;;:::::==========================::aa• Indicator 2.4 - Teaching and Learning Materials 2.4.1 Adequacy of Teaching and Learning Materials Please tick POINTS (,/) Specification Ratio Maximum= Institution's No Self Developed Teaching 16 Evaluation and Learning Materials 0 Institutions developed teaching and learning materials based 2 on curriculum per program Teaching and Learning 1 :5 and above 0 Materials 1:4 1 1.3 2 • Print-based (hand-outs, 1:2 3 modules, workbooks, manuals, 1 :1 4 etc.) 0 • Non-print based (e- 1 2 books, videos, CDs, DVDs, 3 etc. 4 0 (Material vs. Student Ratio) 1 2 • Use of tools and 1 : 5 and above 3 1:4 0 equipment (computer, 1:3 1 machines, hand tools, etc.) per 1 :2 2 class or session 1:1 3 (Tools/Equipment vs. Student Ratio) • Audio visual aids 1 :4 and above 1:3 (multimedia projector, CDs, 1:2 DVDs, etc.) 1:1 (Equipment vs. Classroom Ratio) • Innovative Laboratories None 1 (Business incubation lab, 2 teleconferencing, speech lab, 3 reading and writing lab, science lab, greening technology lab, virtual lab, etc.) (Number of laboratories) APACC Accreditation Manual -80-

59 -1========================::;;::::===; ; :;:'.==~~=~- Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 12. List of Teaching and Learning Materials • Students' Data • Prepared Teachers' Developed Learning Materials • Inventory of Tools and Equipment/Audio-Visuals 2.4.2 Financial Management for Instructional Materials Please POINTS Specification tick Maximum=4 Institution's (,/) Evaluation Allocated budget for only 1 material (e.g. print, non-print, 0 consumables, tools & equipment, audio-visual aids, laboratories) 1 Allocated budget for 2 materials 2 Allocated budget for 3 materials 3 Allocated budget for 4 materials Allocated budget for more than 4 4 materials to ensure requirements of curriculum Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Annual Budget • Budget allocation for instructional materials • Financial statements • List of Procured/Developed Items 2.4.3 Compliance of student-instructional materials based on curriculum (relevance and adequacy) Average Percent Please POINTS Compliance Specification National Institution's based on tick Maximum=4 Institution's Standards Status curriculum (,/) Evaluation 20 or less 0 Instructional 21-40 1 Materials 41-60 2 61 -80 3 81 and above 4 --===:::=:===========:=:::;::::::::===:::-;i i i i i i i i i i i i i i .;;;;;;;;;;;;:========- APACC Accreditation Manual -81-

60 --=========================~=======- Data Required and Means of Verification: • List of Students Enrolled • List of instructional materials, including location • Inventory of instructional materials • Government Prescribed Requirements (Specified by curriculum, minimum requirements document) Indicator 2.5 - Teaching and Learning Methods and Techniques 2.5.1 Adoption of teaching and learning pedagogies (teaching and learning methods and techniques) Specification Please POINTS tick Maximum Institution's Only Traditional Method (Lecture) Applied (,/) Developed session plan indicating 1 teaching and learning method =20 Evaluation which has been implemented, in addition to traditional method 0 Developed session plan indicating 2 teaching and learning methods 4 which have been implemented, in addition to traditional method Developed session plan indicating 3 teaching and learning methods 8 which have been implemented, in addition to traditional method Developed session plan indicating 4 teaching and learning methods 12 which have been implemented, in addition to traditional method Developed session plan indicating 5 or more teaching and learning 16 methods which have been implemented, in addition to traditional method 20 Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 13: Teaching and Learning Methods Applied • Authentic Lesson/Session Plan • Students' Feedback • Teacher Evaluation by Student • Supervisors' Class Observation Report -m:::===============-------iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:::========- APAC C Accreditation Manual -82-

61 -1===============================:;:=: : : : ::::=::aa- lndicator 2.6 - Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Management 2.6.1 Monitoring and Evaluation System Please POINTS tick Specification (,/) Maximum= 12 Institution's Evaluation No M&E Plan of Teaching and Leaming System Developed M&E Plan of Teaching and Leaming System 0 Implemented M&E Plan of 40 - 60% of programs and instructors 4 Implemented M&E Plan of 61 - 80% of programs and instructors 6 Implemented M&E Plan of 80% and above programs and instructors 8 Implemented M&E Plan of all programs and instructors 10 12 2.6.2 Utilization of Monitoring and Evaluation Results Please POINTS tick Specification (,/) Maximum=8 Institution's Evaluation Utilized M&E Results to improve teaching and learning process of less than 20 % of the programs 0 Utilized M&E Results to improve teaching and learning 2 process of 21- 40% of the programs 4 Utilized M&E Results to improve teaching and learning process of 41-60% of the programs 6 Utilized M&E Results to improve teaching and learning 8 process of 61-80% of the programs Utilized M&E Results to improve teaching and learning process of all programs Data Required and Means of Verification: • Monitoring and Evaluation Plan • Monitoring and Evaluation Report • Student assessment • Teaching Staff Classroom Observation/Performance Results • HRD programs based on feedback from M&E --================::::'.~===========:::::==========- APACC Accreditation Manual -83-

62 -,==~=:.:::::::::::::::=======================;:;:::::::::::::~=========: : : :==!- Criterion 3 - Human Resources The standard of the institution is greatly measured by the qualification of teaching and non-teaching staff. The institution maintains high ranking teaching staff in terms of their academic qualifications, experience and professional competence. It maintains an effective system of recruiting, maintaining and developing an adequate number of highly qualified and appropriate teaching and non-teaching staff. Indicator 3.1 - Qualifications of Teaching Staff 3.1.1 Academic qualifications and experiences of teaching staff Prescribed Prescribed Percentage of teaching staff having the Institution's minimum minimum prescribed qualifications & experiences Evaluation qualification experience Specification Below 21-40 41-60 61 -80 81 and 20 (1) (2) (3) Principal/Head of (0) above Institute/Program (4) Director/Program Coordinator/Academic Head Chief Instructor/Head of the Department/Assistant Professor/Senior Academic OfficerNocational Instruction Supervisor Senior Lecturer/Lecturer/ Instructor Junior Instructor/or its equivalent Teaching/Lab Assistant MAXIMUM POINTS: 20 Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 14. Teaching Staff Information • Profile of teaching staff • Job Description • Government Standards • Policy on recruitment, selection and orientation of teaching staff APACC Accreditation Manual -84-

63 -=====:::::::===============================:=:::=::::;;:_- 3.1.2 Industrial background of teaching staff (at least 2 years) POINTS Specification Please Maximum =4 Institution's (Percentage of teaching staff tick (.I) Evaluation coming from the industry or have industrv backaround) 0 1 0 1 -15% 2 16-30% 3 31-45% 4 46% and above Note: Industrial background can be work experience, immersion, and occupational skills training Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 14. Teaching Staff Information • Profile of teaching staff Indicator 3.2 - Qualification of Non-Teaching Staff 3.2.1 Academic qualifications and experiences of non-teaching staff Prescribed Prescribed Percentage of non-teaching staff having Institution's minimum minimum the prescribed qualification & experience Evaluation Qualification experience Specification 50 or 51-60 61-70 71-80 81 and less (1) (2) (3) above Regular (regular (0) status- a (4) continuing appointment)/ Probationary (an appointment to a position for a designated period)/ Temporary (an appointment to provide a non- regular appointment to a vacant position) MAXIMUM POINTS: 4 -1;:::=:::=:'.:::::::::::::::::::::============~===========:===::::::::::==- APACC Accreditation Manual -85-

64 Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 15. Non-Teaching Staff Information • Profile of Non-Teaching Staff • Job Description • Government Standard • Policy on recruitment, selection and orientation of non-teaching staff Indicator 3.3 - Teaching Staff Assignments and Load 3.3.1 Teaching Staff load/assignments and preparation time Specification POINTS (Percentage of Please tick Established Compliance) (,/) Maximum=4 government or Institution's 0 institutional Evaluation 1 2 standards 3 60% or less 4 Teaching load/ assignments: 61 - 70% (Hours/Week) 71-80% 81-90% Preparation Time: 91% and above Data Required and Means of Verification: • Written Policy of Teaching Staff Loading and Assignments explaining how instruction, research, outreach, consultancy, administrative and other duties are factored into the computation of the workload • Detailed Copy of Individual Teaching Staff Workload and Schedule • Standard Workload Guidelines -1~=====:=;:=:============;::::=::::::'.'.':=========- APACC Accreditation Manual -86-

65 -,====================: '.: :==~: : : : ==============--- 3.3.2 Teacher-student ratio Please POINTS Specification tick Maximum= Institution's (,/) 4 Evaluation (Percentage of Compliance For Theory Class 0 [Desired Teacher-Student Ratio= 1 :20)) 1 60% or less 2 61 - 70% 3 71 -80% 4 81 -90% 91% and above Specification Please POINTS tick (Percentage of Compliance (,/) Maximum= Institution's For Practical Class 4 Evaluation [Desired Teacher-Student Ratio= 1:10]) 0 60% or less 1 61 - 70% 2 3 71 -80% 4 81 -90% 91% and above Note: Percentage compliance pertains to the percentage of classes complying with the national standard or desired teacher to student ratio (for countries with no national standard) Data Required and Means of Verification: • Number of students in theory and practical classes • Detailed Copy of Individual Teaching Staff Workload and Schedule • Standard Workload Guidelines _,-::=================: : : : :'.: :=:=======================- APACC Accreditation Manual -87-

66 Indicator 3.4 - Systems of Recruitment, Evaluation, Development and Motivation 3.4.1 System of teaching and non-teaching staff recruitment Specification Please POINTS tick (Percentage of compliance with (,/) Maximum=4 Institution's national/institutional recruitment policies) Evaluation 60% or less 61 -70% 0 71 -80% 81 -90% 1 91% and above 2 3 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: • Policy on Selection and Recruitment of teaching and non-teaching staff • List of approving bodies/persons • List of teaching staff • List of non-teaching staff 3.4.2 Filling up of vacant posts POINTS Specification Please Maximum=4 Institution's tick(,/) Evaluation (Percentage of posts for teaching and non-teaching staff that is filled). 0 1 0-20% 2 21 -40% 41-60% 3 61 -80% 4 81 % and above Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 16: Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff Posts and Designated Personnel • Mechanisms or strategies used in filling up vacant positions, such as newspaper advertisements, online ads -1-========::::::=:~===============:::::'.~:::::::=============­ APACC Accreditation Manual -88-

67 -======:::::::::=::;:;:::::::::: : : : : :::::::=======:::::::===============:;;;;;;=-- 3.4.3 Stakeholders' involvement in the selection and recruitment process of teaching and non-teaching staff POINTS Specification Please Maximum=4 Institution's tick Evaluation (Average Percentage Involvement of (,/) Stakeholders [e.g. industry, external subject specialists, community and alumni] in selection and recruitment process) No involvement 0 1 -10% 1 2 11 -20% 3 21 -30% 4 31 % and above Data Required and Means of Verification: • Composition of recruitment and selection committee/authority • Minutes of meetings • Record of attendance 3.4.4 Compensation of teaching and non-teaching staff Specification Please POINTS tick (Percentage of Compliance to Norms) (,/) Maximum=4 Institution's 60% or less Evaluation 61 - 70% 71 -80% 0 81 -90% 91% and above 1 2 3 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 17. Type of Compensation in addition to salary • List of teaching staff • List of non-teaching staff • Written policy on compensation and rewards -• Report of teaching and non-teaching staff recipients for the last 3 years APACC Accreditation Manual -89-

68 -========:==::::===============~====:::::====i- 3.4.5 Performance Evaluation Specification Please POINTS tick (Frequency of teaching and non-teaching (,/) Maximum=4 Institution's staff evaluation) Evaluation Never 0 Only when complaints are received 1 Only when promotions are done/ vacant positions are to be filled up 2 Once a year or as required 3 Twice a year 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: • Procedure on Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff Performance Evaluation • Report of Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff Performance evaluation for the last 3 years 3.4.6 Staff Development POINTS Specification Please Maximum =4 Institution's Evaluation (Percentage of Teaching Staff tick Participation in Development Programs (,/) [e.g. seminars, workshops, in-service 0 training]) 1 20% or less 2 3 21 -40% 4 41 -60% 61 -80% 81% and above -1~::::==========:;;;;:~==============::::;::;=======:;;:~1- APACC Accreditation Manual -90-

69 Specification POINTS (Percentage of Non-Teaching Staff Please Maximum =4 Institution's Participation in Development Programs Evaluation [e.g. seminars, workshops, in-service tick (,/) traininal) 20% or less 0 1 21 -40% 2 3 41-60% 4 61-80% 81 % and above Data Required and Means of Verification: • Teaching Staff Development Program • Non-Teaching Staff Development Program • Report on training, workshops, seminars conducted • Report of teaching and non-teaching staff participation • Training Needs Analysis Survey 3.4.7 Scholarship Grants A type of financial aid in the form of a grant that does not have to be repaid by the recipient. Scholarships are most often given to recipients for one of two reasons or both: achievement or financial need. Scholarships are set up for all of the tuition and even things like board, food, books and allowances. However, some scholarships won't cover all of such benefits but on a partial basis. Professional Development of teaching and non-teaching staff Specification Please POINTS (Percentage of staff in the last three years) tick Maximum=4 Institution's (,/) Evaluation None 0 Less than 5% 1 5-10% 2 11-20% 3 Above 20% 4 APACC Accreditation Manual -91-

70 ---====:::==================:::;:;:; ;;;::::::;:==~:::======­ Data Required and Means of Verification: Annex 18. List of Recipients of Different Grants/Fellowships/Scholarships in the last three (3) years • Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff Development Program • Summary of scholarship grants through training programs • Summary of scholarship grants through higher degrees • List of sponsors/donors 3.4.8 Best Performance Awards Specification Please tick(~) POINTS Institution awards best performing teaching staff YES NO Institution's Evaluation (1) (0) Institution awards best performing non-teaching staff MAXIMUM POINTS: 2 Data Required and Means of Verification: • Report of Teaching and Non-Teaching staff recipients for the last 3 years • Written policy on rewards ---========~===::::::=====:a--------; ; ; ;--;;;;;;~======:=:-1- APACC Accreditation Manual -92-

71 -1===::::=================~~=~=~======-- Criterion 4 - Research and Development Research and Development (R&D) is an avenue through which new knowledge is discovered, applied or verified and through which appropriate technologies are generated. The institution maintains an environment that firmly supports R&D. Research • An output of a rational and nagging desire to improve the way we work and do our work. Research means searching for a clarifying explanation of an observed phenomenon or finding a solution to an existing problem in the workplace or environment. Development Activity • Refers to the systematic knowledge gained from research and/or practical experience that is directed to producing new materials, products and devices; to installing new processes, systems, and services; and to improving substantially those already produced or installed (Catane, 2000). In other words, this is applied in prototyping, inventing, innovating, in improvising and fabricating. It can also refer to instructional materials development like in the production of modules, workbooks and manuals, etc. Indicator 4.1 - Program of Research and Development (R&D) 4.1.1 Research and Development Please POINTS Tick Specification Maximum=12 Institution's (-1') Evaluation No R & D Plan Prepared R & D Plan based on institutional 0 initiatives and industrial needs R & D activities carried out with industries/other 2 orqanizations Utilized research findings in the regular program 2 plannina/imolementation Conducted above process for more than one R & 2 D oroiect All conducted R & D projects provided positive 2 imoact to stakeholders 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • R&D Plans and Programs (e.g. tracer study, labor market study, action research, • product research, market assessment) • R&D Project Proposals Research Reports -• Proof of development initiatives based on research (innovations, technology, • methods, etc.) Proof of curriculum revision Formal agreements with institutions on R&D APACC Accreditation Manual -93-

72 -1:::::===============:;:; ; ==:====:=: :========-- lndicator 4.2 - Teaching Staff Engagement in R & D 4.2.1 Teaching Staff Engagement in research activities [e.g. joint research, action research in the institution and/or Industry, identification of projects in industry, technology packages] Specification Please POINTS (Percentage of teaching staff engaged in at least 1 research tick Maximum =4 Institution's (,/) Evaluation activitv in the last 3 vears) 0 20% or less 1 21 -40% 2 3 41 -60% 4 61 -80% 81% and above Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 19. List of Teaching Staff Involved in R&D Annex 20. List of completed R&D Activities (conducted/supervised by teaching staff for the last 3 years) Annex 21. List of published R&D Activities (conducted by teaching staff for the last 3 years) • List of Teaching Staff and Profile • Duties and Responsibilities of Teaching Staff • Research Plans and Programs • Research Project Proposals • Research Reports ---==========:=:::::::::=::::::::;iioiiiiiii;;;;;;ii.iiiiiiii;;;;;;;;;:;;;;;;;;;;;:====:;::::======- APAC C Accreditation Manual -94-

73 -========================::;;:===~=~======-- 4.2.2 Teaching Staff Engagement in development activities based on institution's needs [e.g. modules preparation, workbooks and laboratory manuals development, instructional materials development, fabrication and prototyping, innovation and improvisation] Specification Please POINTS {Percentage of Involvement) tick (,/) Maximum=4 Institution's 20% or less Evaluation 21-40% 41-60% 0 61-80% 81 % and above 1 2 3 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 19. List of Teaching Staff Involved in R&D Annex 20. List of completed R&D Activities (conducted/supervised by teaching staff for the last 3 years) Annex 21. List of published R&D Activities (conducted by teaching staff for the last 3 years) • List of Teaching Staff and Profile • Duties and Responsibilities of Teaching Staff • Development Activity Plans and Programs • Development Activity Proposals • Development Activity Reports • Copies of Granted Intellectual Property Rights -IIC:===~====================::::=============---;;::;======- APACC Accreditation Manual -95-

74 -1==~~=:=::::=============: : :; :: ;:;:====::====::=====- lndicator 4.3 - Dissemination and Utilization of R&D Outputs 4.3.1 Reporting, Dissemination, Publication, and Utilization of R&D Outputs Specification Please tick Maximum= 12 POINTS (1') 4 Institution's Evaluation Publication (internal and/or external) 4 and Dissemination of R&D outputs 4 Facilitation of R&D outputs replication in the community and industry Commercialization of developed products or services (Income- qeneratina purpose) Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • R&D Project Proposals • R&D Reports • Copies of Newsletters with write-ups about the R&D Outputs • List of published R&D • Modes of dissemination used and sample write-ups • R&D Implementation Plans • Marketing plan for R&D outputs for commercialization • Commercialization plan for R&D Outputs • Feedback with regard to the commercialized R&D Indicator 4.4 - Management of R&D 4.4.1 Budget/Resource for R&D programs Please POINTS tick Specification (,/) Maximum=4 Institution's Evaluation 0 - 24% of budget utilized based on a roved R&D Ian/ ro osal 0 25 - 49% of budget utilized based on a roved R&D Ian/ ro osal 1 50 - 74% of budget utilized based on a roved R&D Ian/ ro osal 2 75 - 99% of budget utilized based on a roved R&D Ian/ ro osal 3 100% of budget utilized based on a roved R&D Ian/ ro osal 4 -=======::::::===::::===--------Eiiiiioiiiiii--;.;.;. ..;;;;;=====JIIII- APACC Accreditation Manual -96-

75 -m::================~:::::::::::::::::===================-,- Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • R&D project proposals • R&D plans and programs • R&D reports • Record of R&D budget allocation • Institution's annual budget 4.4.2 Institutional Linkages for Joint R&D projects Please POINTS Specification tick Maximum=4 Institution's (,/) Evaluation Conducted joint R&D with less than 10% of identified organizations based 0 on plan 1 Conducted joint R&D with 10 - 49% of 2 identified organizations based on plan 3 4 Conducted joint R&D with 50 - 74% of identified organizations based on plan Conducted joint R&D with 75 - 99% of identified organizations based on plan Conducted joint R&D with all identified organizations based on plan Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Record of institutional linkages with other agencies and organizations for R&D projects • Memoranda of Agreement • R&D plans and programs • R&D reports • Record of R&D budget allocation -- APACC Accreditation Manual -97-

76 -1===:~=-========================: ; ===~~=: : : :====- 4.4.3 Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of R&D programs Specification Please tick POINTS (,/) Maximum =4 Institution's No M&E plan Evaluation Prepared M&E plan 0 Implemented M&E plan 1 Prepared M&E Report 2 Utilized M&E Results 3 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Monitoring and evaluation plan • Monitoring and evaluation tools • List of M&E Staff (Teaching or Non-Teaching) • R&D plans and programs • Policy on monitoring and evaluation of R&D programs • Project End Reports • Monitoring and evaluation of R&D reports 4.4.4 Policy on Providing Incentives to motivate the teaching and non­ teaching staff to conduct R&D programs/projects Specification Please tick Maximum =6 POINTS (,/) No policy 0 Institution's Developed policy 2 Evaluation Implemented the policy 4 Monitored and evaluated the policy 5 Reviewed the policy 6 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • R&D Budget Allocation • List of opportunities for research capability building • Financial proposal of R&D Projects • Policy on Incentives for R&D projects --==~=========~~===========-;;:=============­ APACC Accreditation Manual -98-

77 -,===~~=========:::;:;===================::=:- Criterion 5 - Image and Sustainability The presence of the institution should be recognized by the community. Its image is enhanced by extending its expertise through Outreach Programs, Income Generating Programs, and sharing or getting support to its expertise through Linkages and Networking. Indicator 5.1 - Outreach Programs • A program for extending assistance and services to the community primarily through livelihood and training programs. It is sometimes referred to as extension program or community service program which covers efforts to increase the availability and utilization of services, especially through direct intervention and interaction with the target population. 5.1.1 Conduct and Utilization of Outreach Programs Specification Please tick POINTS (,/) Maximum=8 No outreach program based on Institution's community needs 0 Evaluation 1 - 4 outreach programs 2 implemented, and knowledge and skills transferred to the 4 communities/stakeholders 6 5 - 8 outreach programs implemented, and knowledge and 8 skills transferred to the communities/stakeholders 9 - 12 outreach programs implemented, and knowledge and skills transferred to the communities/stakeholders More than 12 outreach programs implemented, and knowledge and skills transferred to the communities/stakeholders Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 22. List of Outreach Programs and its Utilization by Beneficiaries • Memoranda of Agreement • Proposals for Outreach programs (including possible beneficiaries of the - -service) APACC Accreditation Manual -99-

- -78 • Status reports of Outreach programs • End of program reports on Outreach programs conducted • Feedback from the community • Outcomes/Impact Evaluation Report of Outreach programs • Compilation of PicturesNideos of Activities 5.1.2 Implementation of Quality Management Cycle for Outreach Programs (Planning, Implementing, M&E, and Reporting) Specification Please tick Maximum=4 POINTS (,/) Planning 1 Institution's Implementation 1 Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation 1 Utilization of M&E Report 1 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Outreach program reports • Mechanism of monitoring and evaluation system • Monitoring and evaluation reports • M&E Report Implementation 5.1.3 Involvement of Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff in Outreach Programs Specification Please tick Maximum=4 POINTS (Percentage of teaching and (,/) non-teaching staff engaged in 0 Institution's Outreach Programs in the last 3 1 Evaluation 2 years) 3 20% or less 4 21-40% 41 -60% 61-80% 81% and above APACC Accreditation Manual -100-

79 ---==:::::::: ================~===:::::::=============­ Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 23. List of Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff and their Involvement in Outreach Programs • List of Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff • Outreach Program Reports with list of involved staff • Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff profile • Duties and responsibilities of teaching and non-teaching staff 5.1.4 Contribution of the Institution to Outreach or Extension Programs Specification Please tick POINTS 0- 24% of budget utilized based on (~) Maximum=4 Institution's approved outreach plan/proposal Evaluation 0 25 - 49% of budget utilized based on 1 approved outreach plan/proposal 2 50 - 74% of budget utilized based on approved outreach plan/proposal 3 4 75 - 99% of budget utilized based on approved outreach plan/proposal 100% of budget utilized based on approved outreach plan/proposal Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Annual Reports • MOUs/MOAs • Budget allocation for Outreach • Program budget for Outreach • Outreach Program Reports • Institutional annual budget -- APACC Accreditation Manual -101-

80 ---=================~~====~=================-- 5.1.5 Institutional Linkages for Conduct of Outreach Programs Specification Please tick POINTS (,/) Maximum =4 Conducted joint outreach programs Institution's with less than 10% of identified 0 Evaluation organizations based on plan 1 Conducted joint outreach programs with 10 - 49% of identified 2 organizations based on plan 3 Conducted joint outreach programs with 50 - 74% of identified 4 organizations based on plan Conducted joint outreach programs with 75 - 99% of identified organizations based on plan Conducted joint outreach program with all identified organizations based on plan Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Memoranda of Understanding/Agreement • Outreach program proposals • Outreach program reports Indicator 5.2 - Income Generating Projects (IGPs) 5.2.1 IGPs Implemented Please tick POINTS (,/) Specification Maximum=4 Institution's Evaluation No IGP Implemented Prepared IGP Guidelines and Plan; 0 Implemented less than 50% of planned IGPs Implemented 50 - 74% of planned IGPs 1 Implemented 75 - 99% of planned IGPs Implemented all planned IGPs 2 3 4 -=========:::::~===========:::::=::: :::::::::::==:::llliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii=======1- APACC Accreditation Manual -102-

81 -:~====::::::::::::::::==================::::;: : : '.:~;::::::::::::::::::==1- Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • IGP Guidelines • IGP Plan • Project Completion Report 5.2.2 Net Profit from IGPs (average of the last 3 years) Please tick POINTS (,/) Specification Maximum=4 Institution's Evaluation No net profit Net profit is 1 - 3% of project's cost 0 Net profit is 4 - 6% of project's cost Net profit is 7 - 9% of project's cost 1 Net profit is 10% or more of project's cost 2 3 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • IGP Completion Report • IGP Financial Statements for the last 3 years -·-=======~==~==~------------i i i i i -=-======-1- APACC Accreditation Manual -103-

82 -1================================================-- lndicator 5.3 - Linkages and Networking 5.3.1 Involvement of Enterprises (Industries, SMEs, other business associations) in TVET Programs Please POINTS tick Specification No. of Enterprises (,/) Maximum Institution's =12 Evaluation Curriculum-related 0 Curriculum design, 1-5 0 implementation and 6-10 evaluation 11 -15 1 16 and above Student-related 2 Industrial Training, OJT 0 and apprenticeship 1-5 3 6-10 Teaching Staff-related/ 11 -15 4 Non-Teaching Staff- 16 and above related 0 0 1-5 1 6-10 11 -15 2 16 and above 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Memoranda of Agreement with Enterprises - • Minutes of Meetings About Curriculum • Record of On-The-Job Training • List of OJT and Apprenticeship conducted • Project Proposals • End of Project Reports • Evaluation Reports • Reports of Alumni Affairs -• Reports from Career Guidance and Counselling Office APACC Accreditation Manual -104-

83 -1========================::=:;;:;::;:: :::=::=:=:::::::=====1- 5.3.2 Consortia/Arrangements with Educational Institutions and Government Agencies No. of consortia/ Please POINTS arrangements tick Specification (./) Maximum Institution's =6 Evaluation 0 0 1-5 Student-related 6-10 1 (Student Exchanges, Joint 11 and above Research and Outreach 2 Activities) 0 1-6 3 Teaching Staff-related 6-10 (Teaching Staff Exchanges, 11 and above 0 Joint Research and Outreach Activities) 1 2 3 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Memoranda of Agreement on Consortia or Other Arrangements • Reports on Consortia/Arrangements • Research Reports • Mechanism for student and teaching staff exchange • HRD Plan • List of students and teaching staff who have availed of the exchange program --==========: '.'.: =========================- APACC Accreditation Manual -105-

84 ---=============================::::::::::'.:: : : .: :::::::::==========- Criterion 6 - Other Resources The institution provides an environment which is conducive to effective teaching and learning that supports the educational programs offered by the institution. The adequacy of financial resources, physical facilities, library, tools and equipment, information and communications technology as well as facilities' repair and management are paramount. Indicator 6.1 - Financial Resources 6.1.1 Operational Budget (Working Capital/Recurrent Cost/Operational Budget) Specification Please tick Maximum=4 POINTS {allocated budget vs. (,/) 0 Institution's planned budget) 1 Evaluation 2 Less than 40% 3 4 40-60% 61 -80% 81-99% 100% Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Budget Allocation • Budget Proposal • Financial Statements • Strategic Plan 6.1.2 Developmental Budget (infrastructure, tools and equipment, HRD) Specification Please tick Maximum =4 POINTS {allocated budget vs. (,/) 0 Institution's planned budget) 1 Evaluation 2 Less than 40% 3 4 40-60% 61 -80% 81 -99% 100% -ac:=============~:::::========-iiiiii=--=========- APACC Accreditation Manual -106-

85 -==========================~~==:::==============:aa• Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Budget Allocation • Budget Proposal • Financial Statements 6.1.3 Annual Budget Increment [average of last 3 years] Specification Please tick Maximum=4 POINTS (Percentage Increase) (,/) 0 Institution's 0 1 Evaluation 1-5% 2 6-10% 3 11 - 15% 4 16% and above Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) Annex 24. Sources of Additional Budget • Proposed Annual Budget • Current Annual Budget • Budget Reports 6.1.4 External Financial Audit Specification Please tick Maximum =4 POINTS (Frequency) (,/) 0 Institution's None in 3 years and beyond 1 Evaluation Only when applying for accreditation or certification 2 Once in 3 years 3 Once in 2 years 4 Once a year Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Auditing Manual • Accounting Manual ----===================::iii iiiiii--;;;;;;=======::;;;;;:::::=:::=======- APACC Accreditation Manual -107-

86 -1=:::::::===================~=:::::;=:::::::::::::=:::::=============-- • Audited Financial Statements • Financial Audit Reports (Regular and Special) 6.1.5 Contribution of Income generating fund to the annual budget for institutional development Specification Please tick POINTS (Percentage contribution of (,/) Maximum =4 income generating fund to Institution's 0 Evaluation the annual budget for 1 institutional development) 2 3 0 4 1-5% 6-10% 11 -15% 16% and above Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Budget Manual/Financial Plan • Approved budget (contribution from regular funding sources vs. income generating fund) • List of IDP's outputs 6.1.6 Budget Preparation and Planning Specification Please POINTS (Percentage of Management Team tick (,/) Maximum=4 Institution's involved in budget preparation, Evaluation allocation, management, and control) 0 0 1-20% 1 21-40% 2 41-60% 3 61% and above 4 Data Required and Means of Verification: (Please provide data for the last 3 years, where applicable) • Duties and Responsibilities of Management Tearn as defined by institution • Budget Reports • Minutes of Meetings • Organizational Chart • Departmental Budget Proposal • Annual Work Plan APACC Accreditation Manual -108-

87 -1=:::::=====================:::;: :::;;:::::=:::::::::==============:-.ai- lndicator 6.2 - Physical Facilities 6.2.1 Area and Accessibility of Institution (Polytechnic, College, School, Center) Specification National Institution's Percent Please POINTS Area Standards Status Compliance tick Maximum= Institution's (,;\") Accessibility * 4 Evaluation 0 Less than 80% 1 2 80- 99% 0 100% 1 Not accessible by any means 2 of transportation Accessible by privately owned transportation Accessible by public transportation or institution's own transportation system Data Required and Means of Verification: • Government Standards in Education • Institution Map • Master Plan of the Institution • Building Permits • Public transportation service details 6.2.2 Classrooms Specification National Institution's Percent Please POINTS Standards Status Compliance tick Maximum Institution's Classroom (,;\") Size Less than =4 Evaluation 80% 0 80-99% 2 100% 4 -~====================-mm---.i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ;;;;;;:::;;::::::;;;;;===- APACC Accreditation Manual -109-


Like this book? You can publish your book online for free in a few minutes!
Create your own flipbook