RED LIST OF MAMMALS FOR PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

V. THE CRITERIA FOR CRITICALLY ENDANGERED, ENDANGERED AND VULNERABLE CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR) A taxon is Critically Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the following criteria (A to E), and it is therefore considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild: A. Reduction in population size based on any of the following: 1. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥90% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased, based on (and specifying) any of the following: (a) direct observation (b) an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon (c) a decline in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat (d) actual or potential levels of exploitation (e) the effects of introduced taxa, hybridization, pathogens, pollutants, competitors or parasites. 2. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥80% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1. 3. A population size reduction of ≥80%, projected or suspected to be met within the next 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years), based on (and specifying) any of (b) to (e) under A1. 4. An observed, estimated, inferred, projected or suspected population size reduction of ≥80% over any 10 year or three generation period, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), where the time period must include both the past and the future, and where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1. 44

B. Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both: 1. Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 100 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c: a. Severely fragmented or known to exist at only a single location. b. Continuing decline, observed, inferred or projected, in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat (iv) number of locations or subpopulations (v) number of mature individuals. c. Extreme fluctuations in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) number of locations or subpopulations (iv) number of mature individuals. 2. Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 10 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c: a. Severely fragmented or known to exist at only a single location. b. Continuing decline, observed, inferred or projected, in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat (iv) number of locations or subpopulations (v) number of mature individuals. c. Extreme fluctuations in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) number of locations or subpopulations (iv) number of mature individuals. 45

C. Population size estimated to number fewer than 250 mature individuals and either: 1. An estimated continuing decline of at least 25% within three years or one generation, whichever is longer, (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future) OR 2. A continuing decline, observed, projected, or inferred, in numbers of mature individuals AND at least one of the following (a–b): a. Population structure in the form of one of the following: (i) no subpopulation estimated to contain more than 50 mature individuals, OR (ii) at least 90% of mature individuals in one subpopulation. b. Extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals. D. Population size estimated to number fewer than 50 mature individuals. E. Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 50% within 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years). ENDANGERED (EN) A taxon is Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the following criteria (A to E), and it is therefore considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild: A. Reduction in population size based on any of the following: 1. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥70% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased, based on (and specifying) any of the following: (a) direct observation (b) an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon (c) a decline in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat (d) actual or potential levels of exploitation 46

(e) the effects of introduced taxa, hybridization, pathogens, pollutants, competitors or parasites. 2. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥50% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1. 3. A population size reduction of ≥50%, projected or suspected to be met within the next 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years), based on (and specifying) any of (b) to (e) under A1. 4. An observed, estimated, inferred, projected or suspected population size reduction of ≥50% over any 10 year or three generation period, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), where the time period must include both the past and the future, and where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1. B. Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both: 1. Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 5000 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c: a. Severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than five locations. b. Continuingdecline,observed,inferredorprojected,inanyofthefollowing: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat (iv) number of locations or subpopulations (v) number of mature individuals. c. Extreme fluctuations in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) number of locations or subpopulations (iv) number of mature individuals. 47

2. Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 500 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c: a. Severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than five locations. b. Continuingdecline,observed,inferredorprojected,inanyofthefollowing: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat (iv) number of locations or subpopulations (v) number of mature individuals. c. Extreme fluctuations in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) number of locations or subpopulations (iv) number of mature individuals. C. Population size estimated to number fewer than 2500 mature individuals and either: 1. An estimated continuing decline of at least 20% within five years or two generations, whichever is longer, (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future) OR 2. A continuing decline, observed, projected, or inferred, in numbers of mature individuals AND at least one of the following (a–b): a. Population structure in the form of one of the following: (i) no subpopulation estimated to contain more than 250 mature individuals, OR (ii) at least 95% of mature individuals in one subpopulation. b. Extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals. D. Population size estimated to number fewer than 250 mature individuals. E. Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 20% within 20 years or five generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years). 48

VULNERABLE (VU) A taxon is Vulnerable when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the following criteria (A to E), and it is therefore considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild: A. Reduction in population size based on any of the following: 1. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥50% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are: clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased, based on (and specifying) any of the following: (a) direct observation (b) an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon (c) a decline in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and/or quality of habitat (d) actual or potential levels of exploitation (e) the effects of introduced taxa, hybridization, pathogens, pollutants, competitors or parasites. 2. An observed, estimated, inferred or suspected population size reduction of ≥30% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1. 3. A population size reduction of ≥30%, projected or suspected to be met within the next 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years), based on (and specifying) any of (b) to (e) under A1. 4. An observed, estimated, inferred, projected or suspected population size reduction of ≥30% over any 10 year or three generation period, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), where the time period must include both the past and the future, and where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1. B. Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both: 1. Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 20,000 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c: 49

a. Severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than 10 locations. b. Continuing decline, observed, inferred or projected, in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat (iv) number of locations or subpopulations (v) number of mature individuals. c. Extreme fluctuations in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) number of locations or subpopulations (iv) number of mature individuals. 2. Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 2000 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c: a. Severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than 10 locations. b. Continuingdecline,observed,inferredorprojected,inanyofthefollowing: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) area, extent and/or quality of habitat (iv) number of locations or subpopulations (v) number of mature individuals. c. Extreme fluctuations in any of the following: (i) extent of occurrence (ii) area of occupancy (iii) number of locations or subpopulations (iv) number of mature individuals. C. Population size estimated to number fewer than 10,000 mature individuals and either: 1. An estimated continuing decline of at least 10% within 10 years or three generations, whichever is longer, (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future) OR 50

2. A continuing decline, observed, projected, or inferred, in numbers of mature individuals AND at least one of the following (a–b): a. Population structure in the form of one of the following: (i) no subpopulation estimated to contain more than 1000 mature individuals, OR (ii) all mature individuals are in one subpopulation. b. Extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals. D. Population very small or restricted in the form of either of the following: 1. Population size estimated to number fewer than 1000 mature individuals. 2. Population with a very restricted area of occupancy (typically less than 20 km2) or number of locations (typically five or fewer) such that it is prone to the effects of human activities or stochastic events within a very short time period in an uncertain future, and is thus capable of becoming Critically Endangered or even Extinct in a very short time period. E. Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 10% within 100 years. 51

Annex 1: Uncertainty The Red List Criteria should be applied to a taxon based on the available evidence concerning its numbers, trend and distribution. In cases where there are evident threats to a taxon through, for example, deterioration of its only known habitat, a threatened listing may be justified, even though there may be little direct information on the biological status of the taxon itself. In all these instances there are uncertainties associated with the available information and how it was obtained. These uncertainties may be categorized as natural variability, semantic uncertainty and measurement error (Akçakaya et al. 2000). This section provides guidance on how to recognize and deal with these uncertainties when using the criteria. Natural variability results from the fact that species’ life histories and the environments in which they live change over time and space. The effect of this variation on the criteria is limited, because each parameter refers to a specific time or spatial scale. Semantic uncertainty arises from vagueness in the definition of terms or lack of consistency in different assessors’ usage of them. Despite attempts to make the definitions of the terms used in the criteria exact, in some cases this is not possible without the loss of generality. Measurement error is often the largest source of uncertainty; it arises from the lack of precise information about the parameters used in the criteria. This may be due to inaccuracies in estimating the values or a lack of knowledge. Measurement error may be reduced or eliminated by acquiring additional data. For further details, see Akçakaya et al. (2000) and Burgman et al. (1999). One of the simplest ways to represent uncertainty is to specify a best estimate and a range of plausible values. The best estimate itself might be a range, but in any case the best estimate should always be included in the range of plausible values. When data are very uncertain, the range for the best estimate might be the range of plausible values. There are various methods that can be used to establish the plausible range. It may be based on confidence intervals, the opinion of a single expert, or the consensus opinion of a group of experts. Whichever method is used should be stated and justified in the documentation. When interpreting and using uncertain data, attitudes toward risk and uncertainty may play an important role. Attitudes have two components. First, assessors need to consider whether they will include the full range of plausible values in assessments, or whether they will exclude extreme values from consideration 52

(known as dispute tolerance). An assessor with a low dispute tolerance would include all values, thereby increasing the uncertainty, whereas an assessor with a high dispute tolerance would exclude extremes, reducing the uncertainty. Second, assessors need to consider whether they have a precautionary or evidentiary attitude to risk (known as risk tolerance). A precautionary attitude will classify a taxon as threatened unless it is certain that it is not threatened, whereas an evidentiary attitude will classify a taxon as threatened only when there is strong evidence to support a threatened classification. Assessors should resist an evidentiary attitude and adopt a precautionary but realistic attitude to uncertainty when applying the criteria, for example, by using plausible lower bounds, rather than best estimates, in determining population size, especially if it is fluctuating. All attitudes should be explicitly documented. An assessment using a point estimate (i.e. single numerical value) will lead to a single Red List Category. However, when a plausible range for each parameter is used to evaluate the criteria, a range of categories may be obtained, reflecting the uncertainties in the data. A single category, based on a specific attitude to uncertainty, should always be listed along with the criteria met, while the range of plausible categories should be indicated in the documentation (see Annex 3). Where data are so uncertain that any category is plausible, the category of ‘Data Deficient’ should be assigned. However, it is important to recognize that this category indicates that the data are inadequate to determine the degree of threat faced by a taxon, not necessarily that the taxon is poorly known or indeed not threatened. Although Data Deficient is not a threatened category, it indicates a need to obtain more information on a taxon to determine the appropriate listing; moreover, it requires documentation with whatever available information there is. 53

Annex 2: Citation of the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria In order to promote the use of a standard format for citing the Red List Categories and Criteria the following forms of citation are recommended: 1. The Red List Category may be written out in full or abbreviated as follows (when translated into other languages, the abbreviations should follow the English denominations): Extinct, EX Near Threatened, NT Extinct in the Wild, EW Least Concern, LC Critically Endangered, CR Data Deficient, DD Endangered, EN Not Evaluated, NE Vulnerable, VU 2. Under Section V (the criteria for Critically Endangered, Endangered and Vulnerable) there is a hierarchical alphanumeric numbering system of criteria and subcriteria. These criteria and subcriteria (all three levels) form an integral part of the Red List assessment and all those that result in the assignment of a threatened category must be specified after the Category. Under the criteria A to C and D under Vulnerable, the first level of the hierarchy is indicated by the use of numbers (1–4) and if more than one is met, they are separated by means of the ‘+’ symbol. The second level is indicated by the use of the lower-case alphabet characters (a–e). These are listed without any punctuation. A third level of the hierarchy under Criteria B and C involves the use of lower case roman numerals (i–v). These are placed in parentheses (with no space between the preceding alphabet character and start of the parenthesis) and separated by the use of commas if more than one is listed. Where more than one criterion is met, they should be separated by semicolons. The following are examples of such usage: EX CR A1cd VU A2c+3c EN B1ac(i,ii,iii) EN A2c; D VU D1+2 CR A2c+3c; B1ab(iii) CR D VU D2 EN B2ab(i,ii,iii) VU C2a(ii) EN A1c; B1ab(iii); C2a(i) EN B2b(iii)c(ii) EN B1ab(i,ii,v)c(iii,iv)+2b(i)c(ii,v) VU B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) EN A2abc+3bc+4abc; B1b(iii,iv,v)c(ii,iii,iv)+2b(iii,iv,v)c(ii,iii,iv) 54

Annex 3: Documentation Requirements for Taxa Included on the IUCN Red List The following is the minimum set of information, which should accompany every assessment submitted for incorporation into the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™: • Scientific name including authority details • English common name/s and any other widely used common names (specify the language of each name supplied) • Red List Category and Criteria • Countries of occurrence (including country subdivisions for large nations, e.g. states within the USA, and overseas territories, e.g. islands far from the mainland country) • For marine species, the Fisheries Areas in which they occur should be recorded (see http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/sis/faomap.htm for the Fisheries Areas as delimited by FAO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) • For inland water species, the names of the river systems, lakes, etc. to which they are confined • A map showing the geographic distribution (extent of occurrence) • A rationale for the listing (including any numerical data, inferences or uncertainty that relate to the criteria and their thresholds) • Current population trends (increasing, decreasing, stable or unknown) • Habitat preferences (using a modified version of the Global Land Cover Characterization (GLCC) classification which is available electronically from http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/sis/authority.htm or on request from [email protected]) • Major threats (indicating past, current and future threats using a standard classification which is available from the SSC web site or e-mail address as shown above) • Conservation measures, (indicating both current and proposed measures using a standard classification which is available from the SSC web site or e- mail address as shown above) • Information on any changes in the Red List status of the taxon, and why the status has changed • Data sources (cited in full; including unpublished sources and personal communications) • Name/s and contact details of the assessor/s • Before inclusion on the IUCN Red List, all assessments will be evaluated by 55

at least two members of a Red List Authority. The Red List Authority is appointed by the Chair of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and is usually a sub-group of a Specialist Group. The names of the evaluators will appear with each assessment. In addition to the minimum documentation, the following information should also be supplied where appropriate: • If a quantitative analysis is used for the assessment (i.e. Criterion E), the data, assumptions and structural equations (e.g., in the case of a Population Viability Analysis) should be included as part of the documentation. • For Extinct or Extinct in the Wild taxa, extra documentation is required indicating the effective date of extinction, possible causes of the extinction and the details of surveys which have been conducted to search for the taxon. • For taxa listed as Near Threatened, the rationale for listing should include a discussion of the criteria that are nearly met or the reasons for highlighting the taxon (e.g., they are dependent on ongoing conservation measures). • For taxa listed as Data Deficient, the documentation should include what little information is available. Assessments may be made using version 2.0 of the software package RAMAS® Red List (Akçakaya and Ferson 2001). This program assigns taxa to Red List Categories according to the rules of the IUCN Red List Criteria and has the advantage of being able to explicitly handle uncertainty in the data. The software captures most of the information required for the documentation above, but in some cases the information will be reported differently. The following points should be noted: • If RAMAS® Red List is used to obtain a listing, this should be stated. • Uncertain values should be entered into the program as a best estimate and a plausible range, or as an interval (see the RAMAS® Red List manual or help files for further details). • The settings for attitude towards risk and uncertainty (i.e. dispute tolerance, risk tolerance and burden of proof) are all pre-set at a mid-point. If any of these settings are changed this should be documented and fully justified, especially if a less precautionary position is adopted. • Depending on the uncertainties, the resulting classification can be a single category and/or a range of plausible categories. In such instances, the following approach should be adopted (the program will usually indicate this automatically in the Results window): – If the range of plausible categories extends across two or more of the threatened categories (e.g. Critically Endangered to Vulnerable) and no 56

preferred category is indicated, the precautionary approach is to take the highest category shown, i.e. CR in the above example. In such cases, the range of plausible categories should be documented under the rationale including a note that a precautionary approach was followed in order to distinguish it from the situation in the next point. The following notation has been suggested e.g. CR* (CR–VU). – If a range of plausible categories is given and a preferred category is indicated, the rationale should indicate the range of plausible categories met e.g. EN (CR–VU). • The program specifies the criteria that contributed to the listing (see Status window). However, when data are uncertain, the listing criteria are approximate, and in some cases may not be determined at all. In such cases, the assessors should use the Text results to determine or verify the criteria and sub-criteria met. Listing criteria derived in this way must be clearly indicated in the rationale (refer to the RAMAS® Red List Help menu for further guidance on this issue). • If the preferred category is indicated as Least Concern, but the plausible range extends into the threatened categories, a listing of ‘Near Threatened’ (NT) should be used. The criteria, which triggered the extension into the threatened range, should be recorded under the rationale. • Any assessments made using this software must be submitted with the RAMAS® Red List input files (i.e. the *.RED files). New global assessments or reassessments of taxa currently on the IUCN Red List, may be submitted to the IUCN/SSC Red List Programme Officer for incorporation (subject to peer review) in a future edition of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. Submissions from within the SSC network should preferably be made using the Species Information Service (SIS) database. Other submissions may be submitted electronically; these should preferably be as files produced using RAMAS® Red List or any of the programs in Microsoft Office 97 (or earlier versions) e.g. Word, Excel or Access. Submissions should be sent to: IUCN/SSC Red List Programme, IUCN/SSC UK Office, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, United Kingdom. Fax: +44 (0)1223-277845; Email: [email protected]. For further clarification or information about the IUCN Red List Criteria, documentation requirements (including the standards used) or submission of assessments, please contact the IUCN/SSC Red List Programme Officer at the address shown above. 57

References Akçakaya, H.R. and Ferson, S. 2001. RAMAS® Red List: Threatened Species Classifications under Uncertainty. Version 2.0. Applied Biomathematics, New York. Akçakaya, H.R., Ferson, S., Burgman, M.A., Keith, D.A., Mace, G.M. and Todd, C.A. 2000. Making consistent IUCN classifications under uncertainty. Conservation Biology 14: 1001–1013. Baillie, J. and Groombridge, B. (eds). 1996. 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Burgman, M.A., Keith, D.A. and Walshe, T.V. 1999. Uncertainty in comparative risk analysis of threatened Australian plant species. Risk Analysis 19: 585–598. Fitter, R. and Fitter, M. (eds). 1987. The Road to Extinction. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Gärdenfors, U., Hilton-Taylor, C., Mace, G. and Rodríguez, J.P. 2001. The application of IUCN Red List Criteria at regional levels. Conservation Biology 15: 1206–1212. Hilton-Taylor, C. (compiler). 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. IUCN. 1993. Draft IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. IUCN. 1994. IUCN Red List Categories. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. IUCN. 1996. Resolution 1.4. Species Survival Commission. Resolutions and Recommendations, pp. 7–8. World Conservation Congress, 13–23 October 1996, Montreal, Canada. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. IUCN. 1998. Guidelines for Re-introductions. Prepared by the IUCN/SSC Re- introduction Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. IUCN/SSC Criteria Review Working Group. 1999. IUCN Red List Criteria review provisional report: draft of the proposed changes and recommendations. Species 31–32: 43–57. Mace, G.M., Collar, N., Cooke, J., Gaston, K.J., Ginsberg, J.R., Leader-Williams, N., Maunder, M. and Milner-Gulland, E.J. 1992. The development of new criteria for listing species on the IUCN Red List. Species 19: 16–22. Mace, G.M. and Lande, R. 1991. Assessing extinction threats: toward a re-evaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology 5: 148–157. Mace, G.M. and Stuart, S.N. 1994. Draft IUCN Red List Categories, Version 2.2. Species 21–22: 13–24. Oldfield, S., Lusty, C. and MacKinven, A. 1998. The World List of Threatened Trees. World Conservation Press, Cambridge. 58

APPENDIX III Threat Status for Mammals in Peninsular Malaysia



The information displayed below for each species below contains the following : 1) family – as used by G.B.Corbet and J.E.Hill, in The Mammals of the Indomalayan Region – a systematic review 1992. 2) genus – updated using published information from the above. 3) species – updated using published information from the above. 4) common name – based on the English common name as used by Lord Medway in The Wild Mammals of Malaya 1969 with additions from more recent publications. 5) bahasa name – as used by the Jabatan PERHILITAN 6) code - an internal tool for sorting database records; ignore. 7) Regional distribution - a map of the regional distribution compiled from Corbet & Hill, as well as the work of Boonsong Lekagul & Jeffery A. McNeely in Mammals of Thailand 1977; A.P.M. Van der Zoon in Mammals of Indonesia 1979. These maps are equivalent to the historical EOO for the species. 8) distribution in Peninsular Malaysia – the map of the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupation (AOO) for each species. This has been built by normalizing the point locations of each field record by administrative districts and which is then used to identify the EOO – the current range, and then by identifying suitable habitat with the range, the AOO. For generalist species, the EOO is the same as the AOO (see Tupia glis). For species with narrow habitat demands, the AOO is smaller than EOO, either because of natural ecological variability, or habitat change by human activities. For the species that are affected by ecological change, the AOO has been declining the extent of habitat clearance is shown at four intervals: the ‘original extent’ prior to 1970, 1970-1980, 1980-1990, and 1990-2000 (see Balionycteris maculata). 9) Review 2009 (area in ha.) – gives the area of the EOO and AOO using the 2009 assessment model shown in 8). It should be noted that areas are given in hectares. IUCN quotes EOO and AOO areas as sq. km. To convert hectares to sq.km., divide by 100. 10) EOO – the total historical extent of occurrence or range, in hectares, based on the area of the districts in Peninsular Malaysia where the species has been recorded. 11) AOO 80 –the extent of available habitat within the EOO that existed at the end of 1980. It is assumed that habitat quality is uniform and species density consistent over the whole habitat. Area in hectares. 12) AOO 90 - the extent of available habitat within the EOO that existed at the end of 1990. It is assumed that habitat quality is uniform and species density consistent over the whole habitat. Area in hectares. 13) AOO 00 - the extent of available habitat within the EOO that existed at the end of 2000. It is assumed that habitat quality is uniform and species density consistent over the whole habitat. Area in hectares. 14) % decade change – this gives the changes in the extent of available habitat as a percentage of the area at the start of the 10 year period from 1980 to 1990, and from 1990 to 2000. Using Tupaia minor as an example; at the end of 1990, the AOO was 224,280 ha. By 2000 the AOO had fallen to 168,005 ha. the change in percentage (AOO00-AOO90/AOO90*100=) -25.09%. 15) The assessment published by the IUCN for 2009. 16) Output review 2007 – the output of the assessment by the Expert Group using IUCN Red list criteria by the ad-hoc group at Bkt. Lanchang in 2007. 17) Output review 2010 – the output from this exercise using the AOO areas and % decade change in 11) to 14) above, and the review by the Expert Group at Paya Indah Wetlands in January 2010. 18) criteria A – red list criteria for change in population size. 19) criteria B – red list criteria for change in the geographic range of the EOO or AOO of the species 20) criteria C – red list criteria for population size estimates and population trends 61

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Manidae Manis javanica 1x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Scalyanteater Tenggiling 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20101 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 10,365,856 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 10,303,847 12)AOO90: 10,303,847 0.00% 13)AOO00: 10,303,847 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUA1bd VUA4cd LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1.008 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Erinaceidae Echinosorex gymnurus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Moonrat,gymnure Tikusambangbulan 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20201 2x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 6,558,680 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 6,558,680 12)AOO90: 6,558,680 0.00% 13)AOO00: 6,558,680 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUA4e 18)criteriaB LC 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Erinaceidae Hylomys suillus 3x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lessergymnure Tikusbabi 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20201 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 2,040,635 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 628,499 12)AOO90: 620,042 Ͳ1.35% 13)AOO00: 614,973 Ͳ0.82% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 62

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Talpidae Euroscaptor micrura 4x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Malayanmole Cencuruthutan 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20202 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 68,154 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 56,343 12)AOO90: 56,331 Ͳ0.02% 13)AOO00: 56,163 Ͳ0.30% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Soricidiae Chimarrogale hantu 5x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Malayanwatershrew Cencurutair 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20203 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 296,543 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 125,239 12)AOO90: 124,776 Ͳ0.37% 13)AOO00: 124,011 Ͳ0.61% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Soricidae Crocidura fulginosa 8x 4)commonname 5)malayname: WhiteͲtoothedshrew Cencuruthutan 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20203 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,113,624 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 862,506 12)AOO90: 768,177 Ͳ10.94% 13)AOO00: 700,756 Ͳ8.87% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 63

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Soricidae Crocidura malayana 4)commonname 5)malayname: Malayshrew Cencurutgunung 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20203 9x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 6,444,698 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 6,444,698 12)AOO90: 6,444,698 0.00% 13)AOO00: 6,444,698 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB ENB1+2c(?)&? 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Soricidae Crocidura monticola 10 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Sundershrew Cencurut 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20203 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 473,766 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 209,250 12)AOO90: 205,078 Ͳ1.99% 13)AOO00: 203,986 Ͳ0.53% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Soricidae Crocidura negligens 4)commonname 5)malayname: Greyshrew Cencurutkelabu 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20203 11 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,497 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 13,144 12)AOO90: 12,938 Ͳ1.57% 13)AOO00: 12,035 Ͳ6.98% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 64

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Soricidae Suncus etruscus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Savi'sPygmyshrew Cencurutterkecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20203 13 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 4,525,412 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 3,304,169 12)AOO90: 2,864,949 Ͳ13.29% 13)AOO00: 2,533,292 Ͳ11.58% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Soricidae Suncus murinus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Houseshrew Cencurutrumah 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20203 14 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 4,434,020 12)AOO90: 5,940,114 33.97% 13)AOO00: 6,927,751 16.63% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Tupaiidae Ptilocercus lowii 4)commonname 5)malayname: PenͲtailedtreeshrew Tupaiakarmalam 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20301 16 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 238,906 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 184,648 12)AOO90: 165,104 Ͳ10.58% 13)AOO00: 130,449 Ͳ20.99% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB ENBc(i)&? 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 2.3.237 65

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Tupaiidae Tupaia glis 4)commonname 5)malayname: Commontreeshrew Tupaimuncungbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20301 18 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 13,211,673 12)AOO90: 13,211,673 0.00% 13)AOO00: 13,211,673 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Tupaiidae Tupaia minor 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lessertreeshrew 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20301 20 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 636,995 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 323,464 12)AOO90: 224,280 Ͳ30.66% 13)AOO00: 168,006 Ͳ25.09% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUA4c VUB2ab(iii) 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 2.3.241 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Cynocephalidae Cyanocephalus variegatus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Flyinglemur Kubung 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20401 24 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 8,711,165 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,665,026 12)AOO90: 8,665,026 0.00% 13)AOO00: 8,665,026 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1.034 66

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Aethalops alecto 25 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Greyfruitbat Cecadubukit 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,850,227 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 95,277 12)AOO90: 95,179 Ͳ0.10% 13)AOO00: 94,382 Ͳ0.84% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUA2c 18)criteriaB LC 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Balionycteris maculata 4)commonname 5)malayname: SpottedͲwingedfruitbat Cecadusayapberitik 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 26 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Chironax melanocephalus 4)commonname 5)malayname: BlackͲcappedfruitbat Cecadukepalahitam 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 27 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 67

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Cynopterus brachyotis 4)commonname 5)malayname: LesserdogͲfacedfruitbat Cecadupisang 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 28 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 13,181,642 12)AOO90: 13,181,642 0.00% 13)AOO00: 13,181,642 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Cynopterus horsefieldii 4)commonname 5)malayname: Horsefieldsfruitbat Cecadupisangbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 29 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 13,181,642 12)AOO90: 13,181,642 0.00% 13)AOO00: 13,181,642 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Cynopterus sphinx 30 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: ShortͲnosedfruitbat Cecadusiam 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 791,621 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 791,621 12)AOO90: 791,621 0.00% 13)AOO00: 791,621 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 68

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Dyacopterus spadiceus 31 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Dayakfruitbat Cecadudayak 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 2,650,244 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 2,182,195 12)AOO90: 1,981,596 Ͳ9.19% 13)AOO00: 1,775,963 Ͳ10.38% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: NT 18)criteriaB LC 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Eonycteris spelaea 33 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Cavefruitbat Cecadugua 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Macroglossus minimus 4)commonname 5)malayname: CommonlongͲtonguedfruitbat Cecadumadubakau 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 34 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 10,371,320 12)AOO90: 10,371,320 0.00% 13)AOO00: 10,371,320 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 69

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Macroglossus sobrinus 4)commonname 5)malayname: HilllongͲtonguedfruitbat Cecadumadubukit 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 35 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Megaerops ecaudatus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Tailessfruitbat Cecadutiadaberekor 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 36 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Megaerops wetmorei 37 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Wetmore'stailessfruitbat Cecadu 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 148,249 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 65,460 12)AOO90: 16,670 Ͳ74.53% 13)AOO00: 8,691 Ͳ47.86% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENA4c 18)criteriaB ENB2ab(ii,iii) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 70

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Penthetor lucasi 4)commonname 5)malayname: Duskyfruitbat Cecaduhitampadar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 38 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Pteropus hypomelanus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Smallflyingfox Kluangkecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 39 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 15,225 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 14,963 12)AOO90: 12,676 Ͳ15.28% 13)AOO00: 11,774 Ͳ7.12% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB VUB2ab(iv) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 2.2.015 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Pteropus vampyrus 40 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Largeflyingfox Kluangbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 6,784,106 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 6,784,106 12)AOO90: 6,784,106 0.00% 13)AOO00: 6,784,106 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB VUB1ab(iv) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 2.2.014 71

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Rousettus amplexicaudatus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Geoffroy'srousete Cecadubesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 41 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 2,043,707 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 1,683,989 12)AOO90: 1,476,993 Ͳ12.29% 13)AOO00: 1,272,982 Ͳ13.81% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Pteropodidae Rousettus leschenaulti 4)commonname 5)malayname: Cecadu 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20501 42 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 62,820 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 21,793 12)AOO90: 19,479 Ͳ10.62% 13)AOO00: 17,308 Ͳ11.15% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Emballonuridae Emballonura monticola 4)commonname 5)malayname: LessersheathͲtailedbat KelawartengͲteng 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20503 45 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 72

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Emballonuridae Taphozous longimanus 4)commonname 5)malayname: LongͲwingedtombbat Kelawarkepakpanjang 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20503 46 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 6,080,870 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 4,625,782 12)AOO90: 4,625,782 0.00% 13)AOO00: 4,625,782 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Emballonuridae Taphozous melanopogon 4)commonname 5)malayname: BlackͲbeardedtombbat Kelawardaguhitam 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20503 47 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 13,148,397 12)AOO90: 13,148,397 0.00% 13)AOO00: 13,148,397 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Emballonuridae Taphozous saccolaimus 4)commonname 5)malayname: PouchͲbearingbat Kelawardadaputih 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20503 48 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,529,488 12)AOO90: 7,023,528 Ͳ17.66% 13)AOO00: 6,036,271 Ͳ14.06% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 73

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Nycteridae Nycteris tragata 4)commonname 5)malayname: Hollowfacebat Kelawarmukalekok 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20505 49 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,181,642 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 13,148,397 12)AOO90: 13,148,397 0.00% 13)AOO00: 13,148,397 0.00% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Megadermatidae Megaderma lyra 50 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Greaterfalsevampirebat Kelawarbuas 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20506 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 3,452,211 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 2,934,349 12)AOO90: 2,673,807 Ͳ8.88% 13)AOO00: 2,430,533 Ͳ9.10% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Megadermatidae Megaderma spasma 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lesserfalsevampirebat Kelawartelingalebar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20506 51 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 74

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus acuminiatus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Acuminatehorseshoebat Kelawarladamkenarong 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 52 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 979,020 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 829,321 12)AOO90: 786,483 Ͳ5.17% 13)AOO00: 760,813 Ͳ3.26% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus affinis 4)commonname 5)malayname: Intermediatehorseshoebat Kelawarladamhutan 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 53 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,621 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,529,488 12)AOO90: 7,023,528 Ͳ17.66% 13)AOO00: 6,036,271 Ͳ14.06% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus borneensis 4)commonname 5)malayname: Borneanhorseshoebat Kelawar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 55 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 14)%decadechange 10)EOO: 0.00% 11)AOO80: 0.00% 12)AOO90: 13)AOO00: 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 75

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus chiewkweeae 4)commonname 5)malayname: Chiewkwee'shorseshosebat Kelawar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 56 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 597,320 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 208,902 12)AOO90: 158,991 Ͳ23.89% 13)AOO00: 108,040 Ͳ32.05% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus coelophyllus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Croslethorseshoebat Kelawarladamberpalang 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 57 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 516,822 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 306,810 12)AOO90: 252,191 Ͳ17.80% 13)AOO00: 216,717 Ͳ14.07% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus convexus 58 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Convexhorseshoebat Kelawar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 68,154 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 36,221 12)AOO90: 36,207 Ͳ0.04% 13)AOO00: 35,586 Ͳ1.72% 14)IUCN2009: DD 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 76

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus lepidus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Grossyhorseshoebat Kelawarladambulukilat 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 60 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus luctus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Woolyhorseshoebat Kelawarladamterbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 61 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus macrotis 4)commonname 5)malayname: BigͲearedhorseshoebat Kelawarladamtelingapanjang 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 62 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 624,654 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 458,065 12)AOO90: 386,036 Ͳ15.72% 13)AOO00: 349,319 Ͳ9.51% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 77

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus malayanus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Northmalayanhorseshoebat Kelawarladamutara 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 63 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,592,511 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 716,181 12)AOO90: 706,465 Ͳ1.36% 13)AOO00: 700,831 Ͳ0.80% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus marshalli 64 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Marshall'shorseshoebat Kelawar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 82,176 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 23,564 12)AOO90: Ͳ58.63% 13)AOO00: 9,748 Ͳ10.76% 8,699 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENA4c 18)criteriaB ENB2ab(ii,iii) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus pusillus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Leasthorseshoebat Kelawarladamterkecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 67 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 2,863,376 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 1,179,119 12)AOO90: Ͳ18.86% 13)AOO00: 956,694 Ͳ21.63% 749,802 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 78

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus robinsoni 4)commonname 5)malayname: Peninsularhorseshoebat Kelawarladamsemenanjung 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 68 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 2,601,614 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 2,123,710 12)AOO90: 1,956,959 Ͳ7.85% 13)AOO00: 1,868,108 Ͳ4.54% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus sedulus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lesserwoolyhorseshoebat Kelawarladambulululus 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 69 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 3,353,722 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 1,552,593 12)AOO90: 1,224,437 Ͳ21.14% 13)AOO00: 1,055,482 Ͳ13.80% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus shameli 4)commonname 5)malayname: Shamel'shorseshoebat 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 70 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 82,170 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 26,175 12)AOO90: 12,155 Ͳ53.56% 13)AOO00: 11,018 Ͳ9.35% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENA4c 18)criteriaB ENB2ab(ii,iii) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 79

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus stheno 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lesserbrownhorseshoebat Kelawarladambukit 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 71 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 12,353,842 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 7,919,821 12)AOO90: 6,414,407 Ͳ19.01% 13)AOO00: 5,428,220 Ͳ15.37% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus trifoliatus 72 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Intermediatehorseshoebat Kelawarladam 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20507 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Aselliscus stoliczkanus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Tridenthorshoebat Kelawarserampang 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 73 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 31,155 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 11,307 12)AOO90: 10,545 Ͳ6.74% 13)AOO00: Ͳ13.16% 9,157 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 80

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Coelops frithii 4)commonname 5)malayname: Eastasiantailessbat Kelawarladamtiadaberekor 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 74 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 62,820 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 34,143 12)AOO90: 31,734 Ͳ7.06% 13)AOO00: 29,556 Ͳ6.86% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB1ab(ii,iii);B 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Coelops robinsoni 4)commonname 5)malayname: Malaysiantailesshorseshoebat Kelawarladamtiadaberekor 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 75 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,003,810 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 550,582 12)AOO90: 480,314 Ͳ12.76% 13)AOO00: 440,450 Ͳ8.30% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lcnt 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros armiger 4)commonname 5)malayname: Greatroundleafhorseshoebat Kelawarladambulatterbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 76 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 81

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros ater 4)commonname 5)malayname: Duskyroundleafhorseshoebat 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 77 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 14)%decadechange 10)EOO: 0.00% 11)AOO80: 0.00% 12)AOO90: 13)AOO00: 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros cervinus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Commonroundleafhorseshoebat Kelawarladambulatgua 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 79 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,529,488 12)AOO90: 7,023,528 Ͳ17.66% 13)AOO00: 6,036,271 Ͳ14.06% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros cineraceus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Leastroundleafhorshoebat Kelawarladambulatterkecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 80 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 82

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros diadema 4)commonname 5)malayname: Greatroundleafhorseshoebat Kelawarbahuputih 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 82 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros doriae 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lawa'sroundleafhorseshoebat Kelawarladambulatlawas 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 83 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 210,561 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 127,195 12)AOO90: 113,588 Ͳ10.70% 13)AOO00: 104,253 Ͳ8.22% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros dyacorum 84 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Dayakroundleafhorseshoebat Kelawarladam 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 82,170 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 23,564 12)AOO90: Ͳ58.63% 13)AOO00: 9,748 Ͳ10.76% 8,699 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENA4c 18)criteriaB ENB2ab(ii,iii) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 83

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros galeritus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Cantor'sroundleafhorshoebat Kelawarladambulatgua 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 85 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,850,460 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 1,432,691 12)AOO90: 1,326,824 Ͳ7.39% 13)AOO00: 1,233,992 Ͳ7.00% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros larvatus 4)commonname 5)malayname: Largeroundleafhorseshoebat Kelawarladambulatbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 86 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros lekaguli 87 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lekagul'sroundleafhorshoebat Kelawarlekagul 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 82,170 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 26,175 12)AOO90: 12,155 Ͳ53.56% 13)AOO00: 11,018 Ͳ9.35% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 84

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros lylei 4)commonname 5)malayname: Shieldfacedbat Kelawarmonchongperisai 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 88 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 2,729,317 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 1,917,346 12)AOO90: 1,724,616 Ͳ10.05% 13)AOO00: 1,596,579 Ͳ7.42% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD VUD1 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros nequam 4)commonname 5)malayname: Malayanroundleafhorshoebat KelawarladambulatMalaysia 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 89 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 50,679 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 15,818 12)AOO90: 10,794 Ͳ31.76% 13)AOO00: Ͳ55.93% 4,757 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB1ab(ii,iii); 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros orbiculus 90 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Roundleafhorseshoebat Kelawar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 62,820 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 14,273 12)AOO90: 14,177 Ͳ0.67% 13)AOO00: 14,170 Ͳ0.05% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 85

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros pomona 91 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: ?Roundleafhorseshoebat Kelawarladam 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 82,170 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 26,175 12)AOO90: 12,155 Ͳ53.56% 13)AOO00: 11,018 Ͳ9.35% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Hipposideridae Hipposideros pratti 4)commonname 5)malayname: Pratt'sroundleafhorseshoebat 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20508 92 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 14)%decadechange 10)EOO: 0.00% 11)AOO80: 0.00% 12)AOO90: 13)AOO00: 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Arielulus circumdatus 4)commonname 5)malayname: BlackͲgildedpipistrelle Kelawarhitamkuning 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 94 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 68,154 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 36,221 12)AOO90: 36,207 Ͳ0.04% 13)AOO00: 35,586 Ͳ1.72% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 86

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Arielulus societatis 95 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: Benompipistrelle Kelawarbenom 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 459,084 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 64,789 12)AOO90: 64,409 Ͳ0.59% 13)AOO00: 64,274 Ͳ0.21% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Glischropus tylopus 4)commonname 5)malayname: ThickͲthumbedpipistrelle Kelawartapaktanganputih 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 96 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,211,673 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Harpiocephalus mordax 4)commonname 5)malayname: HairyͲwingedbat Kelawarhidungemasbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 98 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 659,116 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 612,847 12)AOO90: 582,929 Ͳ4.88% 13)AOO00: 571,761 Ͳ1.92% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 87

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Hesperoptenus blandfordi 4)commonname 5)malayname: Lesserfalseserotine Kelawarpetangpalsukecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 99 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,762,252 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 115,059 12)AOO90: 114,636 Ͳ0.37% 13)AOO00: 114,216 Ͳ0.37% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Hesperoptenus doriae 4)commonname 5)malayname: Doria'sfalseserotine Kelawarpetangpalsusederhana 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 100 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 62,820 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 14,407 12)AOO90: 14,312 Ͳ0.66% 13)AOO00: 14,305 Ͳ0.05% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: ENB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Hesperoptenus tomesi 4)commonname 5)malayname: Largefalseserotine Kelawarpetangpalsu 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 101 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 574,717 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 244,936 12)AOO90: 242,547 Ͳ0.98% 13)AOO00: 239,084 Ͳ1.43% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 88

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Pipistrellus macrotis 4)commonname 5)malayname: Brownpipistrelle Kelawarhidungpendek 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 102 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 14)%decadechange 10)EOO: 0.00% 11)AOO80: 0.00% 12)AOO90: 13)AOO00: 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Kerivoula hardwickii 4)commonname 5)malayname: Hardwicke'sforestbat Kelawarhutan 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 104 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 3,315,698 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 2,689,422 12)AOO90: 2,412,283 Ͳ10.30% 13)AOO00: 2,155,000 Ͳ10.67% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Kerivoula intermedia 4)commonname 5)malayname: Smallwoollybat Kelawarhutan 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 105 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 431,794 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 227,497 12)AOO90: 171,331 Ͳ24.69% 13)AOO00: 160,563 Ͳ6.28% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 89

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Kerivoula minuta 4)commonname 5)malayname: Leastforestbat,leastwoollybat Kelawarhutanterkecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 106 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,584,466 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 1,200,580 12)AOO90: 1,119,138 Ͳ6.78% 13)AOO00: 1,057,445 Ͳ5.51% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Kerivoula papillosa 4)commonname 5)malayname: Papillosebat Kelawarhutanbesar 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 107 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 13,181,694 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 8,714,428 12)AOO90: 7,208,335 Ͳ17.28% 13)AOO00: 6,220,697 Ͳ13.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Kerivoula pellucida 4)commonname 5)malayname: ClearͲwingedbat Kelawarkepakjernih 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 108 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 2,227,177 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 844,437 12)AOO90: 692,520 Ͳ17.99% 13)AOO00: 625,373 Ͳ9.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB VUB1ac(?) 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD n 21)PWAschedule: 90

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Kerivoula picta 4)commonname 5)malayname: Paintedbat KelawarkupuͲkapur 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 109 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 247,664 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 93,955 12)AOO90: 89,854 Ͳ4.36% 13)AOO00: 88,943 Ͳ1.01% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: VUB2ab(ii,iii) 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Miniopterus medius 4)commonname 5)malayname: MediumbentͲwingedbat Kelawarjaripanjangkecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 113 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 7,263,765 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 5,781,308 12)AOO90: 4,980,999 Ͳ13.84% 13)AOO00: 4,411,597 Ͳ11.43% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Miniopterus schreibersii 4)commonname 5)malayname: CommonbentͲwingedbat Kelawarjaripanjangbukit 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 114 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,973,101 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 1,607,246 12)AOO90: 1,452,636 Ͳ9.62% 13)AOO00: 1,355,244 Ͳ6.70% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 91

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Murina aenea 4)commonname 5)malayname: BronzetubeͲnosedbat Kelawarhidungbuluemas 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 115 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,071,368 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 693,583 12)AOO90: 612,641 Ͳ11.67% 13)AOO00: 583,487 Ͳ4.76% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Murina cyclotis 4)commonname 5)malayname: RoundearedtubeͲnosedbat Kelawarhidunglarastelingabulat 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 116 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 6,882,923 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 5,504,038 12)AOO90: 4,719,618 Ͳ14.25% 13)AOO00: 4,194,038 Ͳ11.14% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Murina huttoni 4)commonname 5)malayname: Hutton'stubeͲnosedbat Kelawarhidunglarasbukit 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 117 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 530,141 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 313,586 12)AOO90: 279,982 Ͳ10.72% 13)AOO00: 262,857 Ͳ6.12% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 92

1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Murina suilla 4)commonname 5)malayname: LessertubeͲnosedbat Kelawarhidunglaraskecil 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 119 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 5,958,632 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 4,810,824 12)AOO90: 4,137,879 Ͳ13.99% 13)AOO00: 3,672,371 Ͳ11.25% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Myotis adversus 4)commonname 5)malayname: LargeͲfootedbat Kelawarkakipanjang 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 121 x 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 934,614 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 476,614 12)AOO90: 430,910 Ͳ9.59% 13)AOO00: 397,357 Ͳ7.79% 14)IUCN2009: LC 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD dd 21)PWAschedule: 1)family: 2)genus 3)species: 7)regionaldistribution: Vespertilionidae Myotis hasseltii 123 x 4)commonname 5)malayname: LesserlargeͲfootedbat Kelawarbakau 8)distributioninPeninsularMalaysia 6)code: 20509 9)Review2009(areainha.): 10)EOO: 1,316,828 14)%decadechange 11)AOO80: 546,980 12)AOO90: 420,753 Ͳ23.08% 13)AOO00: 350,844 Ͳ16.62% 14)IUCN2009: 15)Outputreview2007: 16)Outputreview2009: 17)criteriaA: LC 18)criteriaB 19)criteriaC: 20)criteriaD lc 21)PWAschedule: 93