The Equivalence of Roots and Fractional Powers
Using Pythagoras’ Theorem, we find that the diagonal of the triangle is… 1 1
2 Using Pythagoras’ 1 Theorem, we find that the 1 diagonal of the triangle is… 2
Construct a square on this diagonal. 2 1 1
Construct a square on this diagonal. 1 1
Divide it up into triangles. 1 1
Divide it up into triangles. 1 1
Each triangle has an area of 1 2 1 1
11 Each triangle 22 has an area of 11 1 22 2 11 2 1
So the square has an area of… 11 11 2 22 1 11 22
So the square has an area of… 2 2 1 1
Remember the length of the diagonal: 2 2 12 1
Remove the rest of the picture… 2 12 1
Remove the rest of the picture… 2 2
If it helps you, rotate the square a little bit… 2 2
2 If it helps you, rotate the 22 square a little bit… …that’s better!
2 This square reminds us that 22 2× 2=2
2x I wonder if we can do this 22x using powers of 2 instead of 2x × 2x = 2 roots…?
2x Let’s use the Index Laws to 22x investigate the algebra. 2x × 2x = 2
2x × 2x = 2 Let’s use the Index Laws to 2x × 2x = 21 investigate the x + x =1 algebra. 2x = 1 x= 1 2
2x × 2x = 2 Returning to our square… 2x × 2x = 21 x + x =1 2x = 1 x= 1 2
2 1 So we can see clearly that 22 22 1 21 2 = 22 22
We could have started with a square of any size. In general, then, we have: 1 N2 = N
Let’s look at this cube now. Imagine it has a volume of 2.
2
So its edge length must be the cube root of 2. 2
32 So its edge length must 32 be the cube root of 2. 23 2
32 In other words, 32 32× 32× 32 =2 23 2
32 Can we write the same 32 thing using powers of 2 instead of roots? 23 2 32× 32× 32 =2
2x Can we write the same 2x thing using powers of 2 instead of roots? 22x 2x × 2x × 2x = 2
2x Let’s use the Index 2x Laws as before. 22x 2x × 2x × 2x = 2
2x × 2x × 2x = 2 Let’s use the Index Laws as before. 2x × 2x × 2x = 21 x + x + x =1 3x = 1 x=1 3
2x × 2x × 2x = 2 Returning to the cube… 2x × 2x × 2x = 21 x + x + x =1 3x = 1 x=1 3
2x Returning to the 2x cube… 22x 2x × 2x × 2x = 2
1 1 Returning to the cube… 23 23 111 1 2 23 × 23 × 23 = 2 23
1 1 So we see now that 23 23 1 1 2 23 = 3 2 23
32 So we see now that 32 1 23 2 23 = 3 2
We could have started with a cube of any size. In general, then, we have: 1 N3 = 3 N This can be extended to fourth, fifth and higher roots too.
Search
Read the Text Version
- 1 - 38
Pages: