Company: Summit EngineeringWorkflow Contact: Rick RundellDate: 4/5/2018 Workflow Healthcheck
1 23 Workflow Discover and Score and RecommendHealthcheck Document Summarize and Review Select a workflow to Score the workflow based Review scoring and diagnose: on industry standards: provide helpful recommendations on - Typical (i.e. day-to-day) - Design efficiency increasing efficiency - Incorporates multiple - Collaboration and products Coordination - Based on new or old - Simulation and Analysis - Industry Standards releases - Communication and Document the workflow Delivery in Autodesk Praxis
Discovery Questionnaire1 Question Responses / Notes Discover What industry or industries does your All AEC segments with a focus in civil engineering and business serve? Document Where do you find the most success? Municipal projects, mainly in 2nd tier land development Record business and workflow-related What is the largest obstacle facing your Winning projects information business today? What is your group’s role in your Pre-design and data aggregation of as-built as-is conditions business? What does today’s selected workflow None – it helps internal teams to collaborate provide to your customers? What does this workflow NOT provide Does not allow versioning of data that you wish it did?
Current Workflow1 Discover and Document Diagram the current workflow state
Current Workflow Score2 Design Efficiency Broken Poor Average Good Innovative Design and data creation and accuracyScore Collaboration and CoordinationandSummarize Workload sharing and load balancingAssess the existing Simulation and Analysisworkflow relative to bestpractices Data generation, metrics and interpolation Industry Standards NA Conformance to industry protocols Communication and Delivery Proficiency in production of deliverables Broken: Loss of work and or data Poor: Manual intervention, rework and or recreation of design or data Average: Features and capabilities yield desired result with minimized risks to performance and data Good: Efficient by industry standards, leverages BIM approach to data sharing Innovative: Best in class, incorporating cloud-based solutions and collaborative load balancing
Current Workflow Summary2 Benefits Risks / Issues Score Design process is optimized to incorporate field data and Requires legacy productivity pack to be enabled; no longer and remote information; could benefit from the use of aerial developed and at risk of unresolvable support issues. Summarize data and use of drone technology. Include observations of Analytical capability is limited but capable of using state Coordination is limited and file-based, leading to benefits and risks or DOT toolkits. redundant data. Potentially places project work at risk due issues of existing to overwriting finalized versions. workflow … Susceptible to data loss when exchanging files with consultants due to obsolete standards and versioning. ……
Recommended Workflow3 Recommend and Review Diagram proposed workflow changes
Proposed Workflow Score3 Design Efficiency Broken Poor Average Good Innovative Design and data creation and accuracyRecommend Collaboration and Coordination Workload sharing and load balancingand Simulation and AnalysisReview Data generation, metrics and interpolationAssess the proposed Industry Standards NAworkflow relative tobest practices Conformance to industry protocols Communication and Delivery Proficiency in production of deliverables Broken: Loss of work and or data Poor: Manual intervention, rework and or recreation of design or data Average: Features and capabilities yield desired result with minimized risks to performance and data Good: Efficient by industry standards, leverages BIM approach to data sharing Innovative: Best in class, incorporating cloud-based solutions and collaborative load balancing
Review Recommendations3 Observations Recommendations Recommend Proposed workflow resolves the risk issues of being on a Migrate to AEC Collections to insulate against outdated and legacy release of Autodesk Civil 3D. support issues and increase point cloud efficiency. Review Current users looking to integrate collaborative Explore a pilot of BIM 360 with two users (James and Provide detailed worksharing; trial of BIM 360 has been tried and used Susan) and measure the efficiency with an ROI report. feedback and propose successfully. next steps …… Next Steps Owner Resources Scope implementation of AEC AEC Specialist (Jon) https://www.autodesk.com/collections Collection (4/17/2018) ACME Engineer (James) /architecture-engineering- construction/overview Review demonstration of BIM 360 with Autodesk TS (Steve) Autodesk technical sales (5/3/2018) Sales Executive (Don) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6 HGaAunlwTE …… …
Autodesk and the Autodesk logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries. All other brand names, product names, or trademarks belong to theirrespective holders. Autodesk reserves the right to alter product and services offerings, and specifications and pricing at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document.© 2018 Autodesk. All rights reserved.
Search
Read the Text Version
- 1 - 10
Pages: