ENGLISH Módulo 6 ETEG 500 Rubrics

Models Applied to Instructional Design ETEG 500 Module 6 Rubrics

Rubrics They are assessment tools that allow a detailed analysis of the tasks carried out by students, and also measure the level of knowledge and skills acquired.

Benefits of Using Rubrics They include, on their vertical axis, the aspects of the task or learning objectives to be assessed, and on their horizontal axis, the specific criteria that will be used to do so.

Benefits of Using Rubrics 1. They help the teacher define the learning objectives and skills desired to achieve and develop with a certain task. 2. It allows students to assess the importance and relevance of the content and objectives of the tasks. 3. They guides students about the development of a certain task and the goals they must achieve. 4. Encourage learning and self-evaluation. 5. Increase the objectivity of the evaluation process. 6. Provides the teacher with the evaluation by competences.

How to Create a Rubric 1. Determine the learning objectives or goals that students must achieve and the basic competences that you seek to develop. 2. Identify the elements or aspects that you should assess when evaluating, and to what extent they have been achieved or developed. 3. Define the rating scales and the criteria that fit them. 4. Review the rubric and see if it has the desired educational impact.

Examples of Rubrics



Levels of Achievement Expository Essay Criteria Excellent Average Poor No evidence Concept prompts 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Writing Skills Effectively and thoroughly Explained the concepts. Poorly explained the concepts. No evidence explained the concepts. Content and Application skills 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Excellent, grammar and Average grammar and Poor grammar and mechanics, No evidence mechanics, used pertinent mechanics, used pertinent used basic vocabulary vocabulary vocabulary 1 Points 0 Points 5 Points 3 Points Demonstrated depth of Demonstrated average Demonstrated superficial relating, No evidence relating, comparing and relating, comparing and contrasting skills. contrasting skills. comparing and contrasting skills. Use of APA In-text 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points citation and excellently complied. Complied partially well. poorly complied. No evidence reference Timeliness 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Submitted journal before or on Submitted journal 1 or 2 days Submitted journal 3 or 4 days after No evidence due date. after due date. due date.

Levels of Achievement Discussion Forum Criteria Excellent Very good Satisfactory Needs improvement No evidence Professional: 7 Points 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Student as researcher Effectively and Basically explained and marginally explained Poorly explained No evidence Communicative: Writing Skills thoroughly addressed addressed assigned and/or addressed and/or addressed Critical thinking/ assigned prompt prompt. assigned prompt assigned prompt Research: Methodology 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 2 Points 0 Points Digital Literacy: Excellent, grammar and Good grammar and Average grammar and Poor, grammar and No evidence Use of Technology mechanics, used mechanics, used mechanics, used basic mechanics, used Ethical/ Moral: Participation pertinent vocabulary pertinent vocabulary vocabulary rudimentary vocabulary 7 Points 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Demonstrated depth of Demonstrated some Demonstrated poor Demonstrated no No evidence investigation, and investigation, and investigation, and investigation, and analysis skills. analysis skills. analysis skills. analysis skills. 6 Points 4 Points 2 Points 1 Points 0 Points Effectively, thoroughly, satisfactorily used Vaguely explained the Ineffectively used No evidence and inventively used online resources to prompts and poorly online resources to online resources to access information used online resources access information. access information to access information 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 2 Points 0 Points Participated actively all Participated by Participated and Participated and No evidence week by responding to responding to most responded to a few responded to at least 1 all peers peers. peer. peer.

Levels of Achievement Oral Report with Presentation Criteria Excellent Good Average Poor No evidence Student as 10 Points 7 Points 4 Points 1 Points 0 Points Investigator Demonstrated full comprehension Demonstrated comprehension of the of the literature about assigned literature about the assigned topic by Demonstrated partial Did not demonstrate comprehension No evidence topic by creating an excellent creating a good presentation complying presentation complying with all with most requirements. comprehension of the literature of the literature about the topic by requirements. about the topic by creating an creating a poor presentation not average presentation complying with complying with requirements. some requirements. Oral and Writing 10 Points 7 Points 4 Points 1 Points 0 Points Skills Average grammar and mechanics, Excellent, grammar and mechanics, Good grammar and mechanics, used used basic oral and written Poor, grammar and mechanics, used No evidence Analysis, vocabulary Synthesis and used pertinent oral and written pertinent oral and written vocabulary rudimentary oral and written Evaluation skills vocabulary vocabulary 15 Points 12 Points 9 Points 5 Points 0 Points Demonstrated great depth of Demonstrated some depth of analysis, Demonstrated superficial analysis, Did not demonstrate analysis, No evidence analysis, synthesis, and evaluation synthesis, and evaluation skills when synthesis, and evaluation skills when synthesis, and evaluation skills when skills when presenting the assigned presenting the assigned topic. presenting the assigned topic. presenting the assigned topic, but topic. tried. Online Research 15 Points 12 Points 9 Points 5 Points 0 Points Skills Effectively accessed online Accessed online resources and videos as No evidence resources and videos as demonstrated by good, updated deficiently accessed online resources Did not access resources and videos demonstrated by excellent, presentation content updated presentation content and videos as demonstrated by poor as demonstrated by deficient presentation content presentation content, but tried. Proper attribution 10 Points 7 Points 4 Points 1 Points 0 Points Demonstrated average digital ethics by Demonstrated poor digital ethics by of sources Demonstrated great digital ethics providing some scholarly references and providing few scholarly references Did not demonstrate digital ethics by No evidence by providing scholarly references citations correctly formatted and others and citations, incorrectly formatted incorrectly formatted. not providing scholarly references and citations, all correctly and citations correctly formatted formatted.

Competencies and Levels of Achievement Graphic Organizer: Concept Map Criteria Excellent Average Poor No evidence Student as scholar 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Writing Skills Effectively and thoroughly Demonstrated some Demonstrated very little No evidence demonstrated knowledge knowledge about knowledge about Contrasting and about relationships among relationships among relationships among Comparing Skills concepts concepts concepts Use of Technology 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Excellent, grammar and Average grammar and Poor grammar and No evidence Submitted task on mechanics, used pertinent mechanics, used pertinent mechanics, used basic time vocabulary vocabulary vocabulary 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Demonstrated depth of No evidence analysis and comprehension Demonstrated average Demonstrated superficial of differences relationships, and similarities among analysis and comprehension analysis and concepts of differences relationships, comprehension of 5 Points Effectively and aesthetically and similarities among differences, relationships, used an application to generate a concept map concepts and similarities among concepts 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Effectively used an application to generate a Used poorly an application No evidence concept map to generate a concept map 5 Points 3 Points 1 Points 0 Points Submitted before or on due Submitted from 1 to 3 days Submitted from 4 to 6 days Submitted 7 or more date late late days late

References Corubric. (2018). Creating an original rubric. https://corubric.com/Guide/es/3.pdf Creation of a rubric. (2018). http://www.usfq.edu.ec/programas_academicos/educacionenlinea/Documents/ manuales/spanish_instructor_course_designer_help/learningenvironment/rubric s/creating_a_rubric.htm Rúbrics: What are they, how are they designed, and TIC tolos for their evaluation. (2017). http://ticteando.org/rubricas-que-son-como-se-disenan-y- herramientas-tic-para-su-elbaracion/#.Wuy8hIgvzIU

Congratulations you have reviewed the theoretical summary of this week's topic! Remember that to successfully build your learning, it is important that: Review as many times as required the information contained in the module folder (include this presentation). Read the reference material for clarification. Perform all activities as instructed. Send the assignments on the date indicated through the educational platform. Participate actively in the collaborative sessions.