Developing a Research Problem Statement            To develop a good research problem statement, consider these      three elements when you start writing.         Important Elements for Writing Research Problem Statement        Original Text: https://wordvice.com/where-does-the-research-                           question-go-in-a-paper/        Key Elements       Explanation        What is known or  Provide a brief overview of knowledge or      believed about      the topic?         previous studies which had been performed in                         the context of your research topic.        What is still       Indicate or justify that your research is new to      unknown or            create a smooth transition into your research      problematic           question.      about the topic?                          Your research question is the question that      What is the           inevitably evolves from the deficits or problems      question or           revealed in the “Unknown” and clearly states      hypothesis of the     the goal of your research.      investigation?                          It is important to describe your research                            question in just one or two short sentences,                            but very precisely and including all variables                            studied, if applicable.                            Use a transition to mark the transition from the                            Unknown to the research question                            Using one word such as “Therefore” or                            “Accordingly,” or short phrases like “For this                            reason” or “Considering this lack of crucial                            information.”    44
Formulating a Good Research Problem Statement        Writing research problem statement entails academic writing  proficiency at a satisfactory level. The novice researcher needs to  master linguistic accuracy and the rhetorical structure required by a  professional discourse community (Williams, 2005). Understanding how  to structure the “Statement-of-the-Problem” section of research is  necessary for ESL/EFL students to develop a logical argumentation for  a problem statement. In order to write a well-organized piece of a  research problem statement section, a novice researcher needs to  make a number of moves and take a number of steps. These moves  and steps are rhetorical movements with specific communicative  purposes or intentions. Some of the moves and steps are obligatory,  but some are optional. The moves and steps may vary in patterns and  sequencing (Swales, 1990). In terms of linguistics, this knowledge of  writing is called genre analysis. To formulate a research problem  statement based on its moves, Sheldron (2012) and Jalilifar et al. (2011),  cited in Parsa and Tahririan (2017), has proposed the generic structure  of a problem statement with three moves as follows.                 The generic structure of SP sections              (Sheldon, 2012 ; Jalilifar et al., 2011)            Original Text: https://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2827-fa.pdf    Move 1: Establishing a territory        Step 1: Topic generalization of increasing specificity          1a. Reporting the conclusions of previous studies          1b. Narrowing the field          1c. Writer’s evaluation of existing research          1d. Timeframe of relevance                                                                         45
1e. Research objectives/processes of previous studies                     1f. Terminologies/definitions                     1g. Generalizing                     1h. Furthering or advancing knowledge             Move 2: Establishing a niche                   Step 1A: Limitations of previous studies                   Step 1B: Stating the problem/need                   Step 1C: Indicating a gap                   Step 2: Presenting positive justifications             Move 3: Presenting the present work                   Step 1: Announcing present work descriptively and/or                   purposively                   Step 2: Presenting research questions or hypotheses                        The rhetorical movement of writing a research problem               statement involves three moves: M1 Establishing a territory, M2               Establishing a niche and M3 Presenting the present work. In each move,               the intentions are expressed in the steps. In M1, there is only one               intention which is topic generalization of increasing specificity. However,               it is followed by eight sub-steps including 1a Reporting the conclusions               of previous studies, 1b Narrowing the field, 1c Writer’s evaluation of               existing research, 1d Timeframe of relevance, 1e Research               objectives/processes of previous studies, 1f Terminologies/definitions,               1g Generalizing, and 1h Furthering or advancing knowledge. It should be               noted that the researcher may use only some strategies of their choices               by combining them or use one specific strategy when formulating a               research problem statement. In M2, the intention to communicate with               the audiences includes step 1A Limitations of previous studies, 1B               Stating the problem/need, 1C Indicating a gap and Step 2 Presenting               positive justifications. Finally, in M3, the intention is expressed in 2               steps: step 1 Announcing present work descriptively and/or purposively               and step 2 Presenting research questions or hypotheses.    46
As far as the pattern of sequencing of the move is concerned,  many scholars such as Sheldon (2013), Jalilifar et al. (2011), Samraj  (2002), Swales (2004), and Shehzad (2008) suggest that M2 (Establishing  a niche) is the most frequent, distinctive, and obligatory component of  the problem statement section as the role of this move is “to criticize  or refute previous claims of knowledge, allowing writers to create a  niche for their contribution” (Sheldon, 2013). Move 2 is the key move  to bridge the divide between Move 1 (what has been done) and Move  3 (what the present research is about) (Swales & Feak, 1994).  Researchers tend to put more emphasis on Move 2, which is used  repetitively to explain the reason for conducting research on the  problem under investigation (Jalilifar et al., 2011).          In addition to the overall selection of Moves, it is also important  to focus on the overall sequencing patterns of Moves. The student  researchers should be encouraged to be move-sensitive which refers to  having explicit attention to the forms and functions of a problem  statement section. They should be able to identify the linguistic  features in each move and step in order to gain a better understanding  of ‘move’ structures. These can be of considerable value to  second/foreign language writers. As far as the SP section are concerned,  the [M1-M2-M3] pattern is still the most frequent combination. The next  most frequent pattern is [M1-M2] and the last common pattern is [M2],  [M1-M2-M1-M2], and [M1-M2-M1-M2-M3].          The following activities are designed for the novice researchers  to learn, practice, and take the advantage of genre analysis so that they  can use this knowledge when they have to write the section.                                                                                        47
Activity 2.3.1.1: Exploring an Example of Research Problem                   Match the given Moves and Steps to the statements. The               statements in the left column are taken from the study of Soheila Parsa,             Mohammad Hasan Tahririan (2017).                                        Part 1     Move 1: Establishing a territory   Step 1: Topic generalization of increasing specificity   1a. Reporting the conclusions of previous studies   1b. Narrowing the field   1c. Writer’s evaluation of existing research   1d. Timeframe of relevance   1e. Research objectives/processes of previous studies   1f. Terminologies/definitions   1g. Generalizing   1h. Furthering or advancing knowledge     Statements:   _________ 1. Strategic learning and pronunciation learning are both areas of study   that have recently received wide-spread attention in second language research   (Brown, 2001; Bruen, 2001a; Celce-Murcia, Brinton, & Goodwin, 1996; Dornyei &   Skehan, 2003; Fan, 2003; Norton & Toohey, 2001).   _________ 2. Adult ESL instructors are a professionally diverse population. Some   have many years of experience in adult ESL and very little formal training in how to   teach adults to acquire a second language. Others have extensive training and very   little experience. Many have both training and experience, and still others have   neither.   _________ 3. Current research in NNS writing suggests that feedback using direct   speech may be clearer and more indirect speech may be more polite.   _________ 4. CEFR defines learning a language as the development of competences   on the part of the learner. Competence includes not only   knowledge, but also the ability to use that knowledge.   _________ 5. Strategic learning research has sought to advance the understanding   of how students tackle difficult language learning tasks using learning strategies. The    48
field of pronunciation learning research also has attempted to discover which areas  of pronunciation are most beneficial for instructors to teach (Celce-Murcia, Brinton,  & Goodwin).  _________ 6. In order to achieve mastery of a foreign language, learners must  develop four principal language skills: reading, writing, listening, and speaking.  However, being able to interact orally with others is nowadays of the utmost  importance.  _________ 7. One way to investigate the effect of strategic learning on pronunciation  learning is to examine the use of pronunciation learning strategies used intuitively  by language learners.  _________ 8. While Cummins' (1986) theoretical framework provides a starting point  for studying a teacher's ideology and practice into empowering literacy teaching,  several gaps in his framework need to be addressed to be able to apply it to a  secondary analysis involving research of EAL classrooms and teachers.                                       Part 2  Move 2: Establishing a niche  Step 1A: Limitations of previous studies  Step 1B: Stating the problem/need  Step 1C: Indicating a gap  Step 2: Presenting positive justifications  _________ 1. There is no reported research that provides a correlation between  successful teachers and training in adult ESL instruction.  _________ 2. Despite the recognized importance of interaction in second language  acquisition, only two studies investigated the impact of IWBs on foreign language  instruction note, particularly the issue of classroom interaction.  _________ 3. There was a great need to design an ESP curriculum that would help  non-native English speaking UVRM housekeepers and others to gain proficiency in  English in the area of nursing  _________ 4. The grammar translation method, which is linked to preparation for  the entrance examinations of Japanese universities, has demotivated students, and  has not led to significant proficiency gains.                                                                                                         49
Part 3   Move 3: Presenting the present work   Step 1: Announcing present work descriptively and/or purposively   Step 2: Presenting research questions or hypotheses   _________ 1. To summarize, the question I wish to answer in this study is: 1. Are   linking adverbials used differently by ENL, ESL, and EFL speakers in their academic   writing?   _________ 2. This thesis investigates how the listening comprehension of   intermediate ESL learners can be influenced by the availability of annotations.          2.4 Structuring the Research: Building a Theoretical Framework and  Developing a Conceptual Framework          After the initial processes of doing research is complete, the next stage is to  build a theoretical framework and/or a conceptual framework which is a logical  structure that will help guide the development of the research. Since a structure is a  fundamental representation of the study, when discussing about structuring research,  the two terms, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework, are usually involved.  Although they are similar in many ways and sometimes are used interchangeably, they  are inherently different.               Discussion                    What is a theoretical framework? What is a conceptual               framework? How are they different? How are they important? What do             they comprise of? Discuss and exchange your answers with the class.                 2.4.1 Building a Theoretical Framework                      In your attempt to write a research proposal, you will use                 theories to help explain, support and/or justify your argument. Often,               this is realized as a theoretical framework.                        In order to understand a theoretical framework, study the               information below to understand its concept and development.    50
Theoretical Framework                              Original Text:        https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/theoreticalframework    Definition of Theoretical Framework        The theoretical framework is the structure that can hold or    support a theory of a research study consisting of concepts, definitions  and reference to relevant scholarly literature, existing theory that is used  in the study. It introduces and describes the theory that explains why the  research problem under the study exists.  Importance of Theoretical Framework          The theoretical framework must demonstrate an understanding  of theories and concepts that are relevant to the topic of your research  study and that relate to the broader areas of knowledge being  considered.          The theoretical framework is most often not something readily  found within the literature. You must review course readings and  pertinent research studies for theories and analytic models that are  relevant to the research problem you are investigating. The selection of  a theory should depend on its appropriateness, ease of application, and  explanatory power.  Developing Theoretical Framework          The theoretical framework is used to limit the scope of the  relevant data by focusing on specific variables and defining the  specific viewpoint, framework, that the researcher will take in  analyzing and interpreting the data to be gathered. It also facilitates  the understanding of concepts and variables according to given                                                                                           51
definitions and builds new knowledge by validating or challenging             theoretical assumptions.             The theoretical framework strengthens the study in the following             ways:                  1. An explicit statement of theoretical assumptions permits the                   reader to evaluate them critically.                  2. The theoretical framework connects the researcher to existing                   knowledge. Guided by a relevant theory, you are given a basis                   for your hypotheses and choice of research methods.                  3. Articulating the theoretical assumptions of a research study                   forces you to address questions of why and how. It permits                   you to intellectually transition from simply describing a                   phenomenon you have observed to generalizing about various                   aspects of that phenomenon.                  4. Having a theory helps you identify the limits to those                   generalizations. A theoretical framework specifies which key                   variables influence a phenomenon of interest and highlights                   the need to examine how those key variables might differ and                   under what circumstances.               Strategies for Developing the Theoretical Framework             1. Developing the Framework                     Here are some strategies to develop of an effective theoretical             framework:                     1.1 Examine your thesis title and research problem. The                       research problem anchors your entire study and forms the                       basis from which you construct your theoretical                       framework.                     1.2 Brainstorm about what you consider to be the key                       variables in your research. Answer the question, \"What                       factors contribute to the presumed effect?\"                     1.3 Review related literature to find how scholars have                       addressed your research problem. Identify the    52
assumptions from which the author(s) addressed the            problem.        1.4 List the constructs and variables that might be relevant            to your study. Group these variables into independent and            dependent categories.        1.5 Review key social science theories that are introduced to            you in your course readings and choose the theory that            can best explain the relationships between the key            variables in your study.        1.6 Discuss the assumptions or propositions of this theory            and point out their relevance to your research.  2. Purpose        Think of theories as the conceptual basis for understanding,  analyzing, and designing ways to investigate relationships within  social systems. To that end, the following roles served by a theory  can help guide the development of your framework.         Means by which new research data can be interpreted and            coded for future use,         Response to new problems that have no previously            identified solutions strategy,         Means for identifying and defining research problems,         Means for prescribing or evaluating solutions to research problems,         Ways of discerning certain facts among the accumulated            knowledge that are important and which facts are not,         Means of giving old data new interpretations and new meaning,         Means by which to identify important new issues and            prescribe the most critical research questions that need to            be answered to maximize understanding of the issue,         Means of providing members of a professional discipline            with a common language and a frame of reference for            defining the boundaries of their profession, and         Means to guide and inform research so that it can, in turn,            guide research efforts and improve professional practice.                                                                                           53
Structure and Writing Style                   The theoretical framework may be rooted in a specific theory,               in which case, your work is expected to test the validity of that             existing theory in relation to specific events, issues, or phenomena.             To understand the nature and function of a theoretical framework, you             may answer these two basic questions:                     1. What is the research problem/question?                   2. Why is your approach a feasible solution?                   The answers to these questions come from a thorough review             of the literature and your course readings (summarized and analyzed             in the next section of your paper]) and the gaps in the research that             emerge from the review process. With this in mind, a complete             theoretical framework will likely not emerge until after you have             completed a thorough review of the literature.                   Just as a research problem in your paper requires             contextualization and background information, a theory requires a             framework for understanding its application to the topic being             investigated. When writing and revising this part of your research             paper, keep in mind the following:                    Clearly describe the framework, concepts, models, or                         specific theories that underpin your study. This includes                       noting who the key theorists are in the field who have                       conducted research on the problem you are investigating                       and, when necessary, the historical context that supports                       the formulation of that theory. This latter element is                       particularly important if the theory is relatively unknown,                       or it is borrowed from another discipline.                    Position your theoretical framework within a broader                       context of related frameworks, concepts, models,                       or theories. As noted in the example above, there will                       likely be several concepts, theories, or models that can be                       used to help develop a framework for understanding the    54
research problem. Therefore, note why the theory you've            chosen is the appropriate one.         The present tense is used when writing about            theory. Although the past tense can be used to describe            the history of a theory or the role of key theorists, the            construction of your theoretical framework is happening            now.         You should make your theoretical assumptions as            explicit as possible. Later, your discussion of            methodology should be linked back to this theoretical            framework.        Don’t just take what the theory says as a given! Reality is never  accurately represented in such a simplistic way; if you imply that it  can be, you fundamentally distort a reader's ability to understand  the findings that emerge. Given this, always note the limitations of  the theoretical framework you've chosen (i.e., what parts of the  research problem require further investigation because the theory  inadequately explains a certain phenomena).      2.4.2 Developing Conceptual Framework           Slightly different from a theoretical framework, a conceptual      framework is developed based on concepts instead of theories. It is    applied when the existing theory is inapplicable or insufficient. Very    often, a conceptual framework is accompanied with a visual    presentation, such as a diagram or flow chart. The following information    will help illustrate a conceptual framework.                                                                                           55
Conceptual Framework             What is a conceptual framework?                      A conceptual framework is a set of ideas, concepts or             principles in the field which are used to structure or scaffold the             research. A conceptual framework is often presented by using a flow             chart, diagram, or mind map to help understanding the research. It             shows variables that influence the research. However, not every             conceptual framework is visualized. Sometimes, it is written             narratively by summarizing variables that influence the research.             Alternatively, both written and visual can be applied to present a             concept of a research for clearer illustration.                              Example of a Conceptual Framework                    This is an example of a conceptual framework of a study on             “Students’ Perceived Influence of Corrective Feedback in Learning             Essay Writing” (Daud et al., 2016)    56
Review Questions         1. Discuss how you can get started with the research process            and formulate research questions and research objectives.         2. Writing a research problem statement section may be quite            difficult for a novice researcher. As a novice researcher            yourself, can you briefly explain the strategies you may            employ to do it?         3. Considering a rhetorical movement of writing a research            problem statement and the sequence patterns of moves in            research problem statement sections, which moves and/or            steps may be obligatory and why?    Chapter Summary and Highlights        To summarize this chapter, it is best to present Latham (2016)’s    research canvas components as follows:                        Original Text: https://www.drjohnlatham.com/wp-                      content/uploads/2018/06/Research_Canvas_20.pdf    Research Canvas Components (Latham, 2016)                                                                                           57
According to Latham (2016), the components are categorized             into two groups, T and U. The T presents foundation to developing             research which includes the problem, purpose, research questions and             conceptual framework (No.1-4). The U presents methodology of             developing research which includes the literature review, overall             approach, data collection, data analysis, and drawing conclusions (No. 5-             9).                     The visual representation covers topics for developing a             conceptual framework from drawing a problem to developing a             conclusion. You can follow the steps to help you complete your             conceptual framework which also determines your research.    58
Getting Started                   Now, it’s the time for you to start reading something to find             your research interest. If you find it hard to start off, watch the             following video on “How to Read an Academic Paper” by UBC iSchool             (without losing your mind) to obtain ideas.                               URL: https://youtu.be/SKxm2HF_-k0    References  Borg, S. (2018). Evaluating the Impact of Professional Development. RELC Journal,          49(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218784371  Brown, H. Douglas. (2001). Teaching by Principle and Interactive Approach to          language pedagogy. New York: Longman Inc.  Bruen J. (2001). The Parallel Development of Oral Proficiency and Use of Language          Learning Strategies. Teaching German, 34(2), 158-168.  Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., M., & Goodwin, J., M. (1996). Teaching Pronunciation: A          Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge        University Press.  Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating        Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson.  Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention.        Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 18–36.        https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.1.b327234461607787  Daud, R. M., Jusoh, J. S., & Ali, N. Z. M. (2016, May). Students’ Perceived Influence of        Corrective Feedback in Learning Essay Writing. Language, Education, &        Civilisation International Conference.                                                                                                          59
Dimova, S., & Kling, J. (2018). Assessing English-Medium Instruction Lecturer Language        Proficiency Across Disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 634–656.        https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.454    Dornyei, Z., & Skehan, S. (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition:        Individual differences in second language learning. Oxford: Blackwell, 589-        630.    Ellis, J., T., & Levy, Y. (2008). Framework of Problem-Based Research: A Guide for        Novice Researchers on the Development of a Research-Worthy Problem.        Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Trans discipline,        11, 17–033. https://doi.org/10.28945/438    Fan, X. (2003). Two Approaches for Correcting Correlation Attenuation Caused by        Measurement Error: Implications for Research Practice. Sage Journals, 63(3),        915-930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251319    Franz, J., & Teo, A. (2017). ‘A2 is Normal’ – Thai Secondary School English Teachers’        Encounters with the CEFR. RELC Journal, 49(3), 322–338.        https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217738816    Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from Good Language Learners (Cambridge Language        Teaching Library) (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.    IATEFL. (2021). Meet IATEFL’s 16 Special Interest Groups | iatefl.org.        https://www.iatefl.org/meet-iatefl-sigs    Jacard, James, & Jacob J. (2010). Theory Construction and Model-Building Skills:        A Practical Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Guilford.    Jalilifar, A. R., Firuzmand, S., & Roshani, S. (2011). Genre analysis of problem        statement sections of M.A proposals and theses in Applied        Linguistics. Language, Society and Culture, 33, 85–93.    JALT. (2019). The Japan Association for Language Teaching. Retrieved August 31,        2021, from https://jalt.org/main/conference    Jennifer, G. (2021). Types of Research Questions with Examples. Yourdictionary.        Retrieved August 31, 2021, from https://examples.yourdictionary.com/types-        of-research-questions-with-examples.html    John, R., Latham. (2014). The Research Canvas: A Framework for Designing and        Aligning the DNA of Your Research Study. Monument, Colorado:        DrJohnLatham.com.    60
John, W., C. (2012). Educational Research Planning: Planning, Conducting, and        Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston, MA:        Pearson.    Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin’s model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching        Writing, 6(1), 81–91.    Latham, J. R. (2016). The Research Canvas: A Framework for Designing and Aligning        the DNA of Your Research Study[E-book]. Organization Design Studio.    Lee J. K. Y. (2009, November). Are You Teaching “What to say” or “How to talk”?        [Practice-oriented long workshop]. College & University Education:        Speaking/Communication (SC), Gifu University. JALT 45th Annual International        Conference, Language Teaching and Learning & Educational Materials        Exhibition.    Lewak, J. (2015, May 21). What do we mean by a research question? Slideshare.        https://www.slideshare.net/BruceH99/what-do-wemeanbyaresearchquestion    Maria Magher. (n.d.). How to Make a Conceptual Framework for a Thesis. Seattlepi.        Retrieved August 31, 2021, from https://education.seattlepi.com/make-        conceptual-framework-thesis-7029.html    Metoyer-Duran, C., & Hernon, P. (1994). Problem statements in research proposals        and published research: A case study of researchers’ viewpoints. Library &        Information Science Research, 16(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-        8188(94)90003-5        Nanchareeya R., & Sumalee C. (2013). An Online Journal of Education, 8(2),        70-84. http://www.edu.chula.ac.th/ojed    Nenty, H. J. (2009). Writing a Quantitative Research Thesis. International Journal of        Educational Sciences, 1(1), 19–32.        https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2009.11889972    Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing Perspectives on Good Language Learners.        TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587650    Parsa, S., & Tahririan, M. H. (2017). Move Structures in “Statement-of-the-Problem”        Sections of M.A. Theses: The Case of Native and Nonnative Speakers of        English. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 20(2), 195–229.        https://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2827-fa.pdf                                                                                                          61
Randall, I., & Umberger, T. P. (2019, December). Assessing an in-house CEFR-based        Placement Exam [Research-oriented Short Presentation]. College and        University Education: Testing and Evaluation (TEVAL), Tokyo International        University.    Ravitch, Sharon, M., & Matthew, R. (2017). Reason and Rigor: How Conceptual        Frameworks Guide Research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.    Robyn, S. (2004). Exploring the usefulness of a conceptual framework as a research        tool: A researcher's reflections. Issues in Educational Research, University of        New England, 14(2), 167-180.    Samraj, B., & Monk, L. (2008). The statement of purpose in graduate program        applications: Genre structure and disciplinary variation. English for Specific        Purposes, 27, 193–211.    Schutz, K. M., Danielson, K. A., & Cohen, J. (2019). Approximations in English language        arts: Scaffolding a shared teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education,        81, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.004    Selamat M. H. (2008). SAK 5090. Retrieved August 30, 2021 from        http://www.csnotes.upm.edu.my/kelasmaya/web.nsf/de8cc2082fc4d31b48257        30e002 bd111/.../$FILE    Shehzad, W. (2008). Move two: Establishing a niche. Ibérica, 15, 25–50.  Sheldon, E. (2013). The research article: A rhetorical and functional comparison of          texts created by native and non-native English writers and native Spanish        writers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Technology.        httpa.org/Systemics/Print/Theses.  Silke Haidekker. (n.d.). Where Does the Research Question Go in a Paper?. Wordvice.        Retrieved August 31, 2021, from https://wordvice.com/where-does-the-        research-question-go-in-a-paper/  Soheila, P., & Mohammad, H., T. (2017). Move Structures in “Statement-of-the-        Problem” Sections of M.A. Theses: The Case of Native and Nonnative        Speakers of English. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 195-228.  Sutton, Robert, I., & Barry, M., S. (1995). What Theory is Not. Administrative        Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384.        Swales, J., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. A course        for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.    62
Swales, J., M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge:        Cambridge University Press.    Swanson, R., A., & E., F., Holton. (1997). Human Resource Development        Handbook: Linking Research and Practice (3rd ed.) (pp.114-137). San        Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.    TESOL. (n.d.). TESOL international Association. Retrieved August 31, 2021, from        http://www.tesol.org/    Torraco, R., J. (2002). Research Methods for Theory Building in Applied        Disciplines: A Comparative Analysis. Advances in Developing Human        Resources, 4(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/15222302004003008    UBC iSchool. (2013, January 8). How to Read an Academic Paper [Video]. YouTube.        https://youtu.be/SKxm2HF_-k0    USC Libraries. (2021). Research problem. University of Eastern California. Retrieved        August 31, 2021, from http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/researchproblem    USC Libraries. (2021). Theoretical framework. University of Eastern California.        Retrieved August 31, 2021, from        https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/theoreticalframework                                                                                                          63
Chapter 3: Survey Research    Introduction          In this chapter, main consideration for survey research being conducted in  ESL/EFL context and data from questionnaire and interview which are self-report  pertaining for the opinion and attitudes of the students, teachers and other persons  involved in the process of EFL instruction are discussed.    3. Survey Research          This part will help you understand what survey research is, why it is used in  EFL research, and how is it conducted.                                         Survey Research                    You will be guided through the following process to enable you             to conduct survey research                                 1. Understanding Survey Research                            2. Exploring Survey Research in EFL Context                             3. Using Questionnaire in Survey Research                                              k                                4. Using Interview in Survey Research                                              k    64
Discussion             What is survey research? Why is it used in EFL research? Discuss        and exchange with the class.    3.1 What is survey research?        When we would like to gain information directly from people such as    their ideas, feelings, health, plans, beliefs, and social, educational, financial  background, etc., we usually use a survey. A survey is a method of collecting  information which can be a self-administered questionnaire that someone fills  out alone or with assistance. A survey can also be an interview that is done in  person or on other communication devices. Study the following information to  help you understand more about survey research.                                 Survey Research           Original Text: https://opentext.wsu.edu/carriecuttler/chapter/7-1-                          overview-of-survey-research/      Survey Research           Survey research employs both a quantitative and qualitative      method with two important characteristics.           1. Data collection: The data is collected with questionnaires or      interviews. Researchers ask their participants or respondents, to report their    thoughts, feelings, and behaviors directly.             2. Samples: To accurately investigate the phenomenon or issue,    researchers would prefer large random samples as the data would provide    the most accurate estimates.                                                                                                 65
Almost everything can be studied using surveys which means that           it can be on any topics. Surveys can be long or short. To collect the data,           researchers may reach the participants in person, via telephone, email or           the Internet. Although survey data are often analyzed using statistics,           qualitative analysis is also applied.          3.2 Why is survey research used in the English language instruction  context?                 There are certain necessities why survey research is commonly applied        in English language teaching context. Survey research can help policy makers        to set or plan a program, evaluate the effectiveness of programs to change        people’s knowledge, attitudes, health, or welfare, and assist a researcher to        conduct a research study. Survey is one of the most popular research methods        in TEFL studies according to Atmowardoyo (2018). Visit the article to read the        full text about the study.                    Research Methods in TEFL Studies (Atmowardoyo, 2018)                   Original Text: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/266996418.pdf           Types of Research Methods in TEFL Studies                    The kinds of methods that may be beneficial in TEFL studies           include the followings: descriptive research, case study, error analysis, and           R & D. These four types are amongst the popular methods employed by           today’s researchers in TEFL studies.           Descriptive Research                    Descriptive research is defined as a research method used to           describe the existing phenomena. The data is collected through the use    66
of research instruments such as test, questionnaire, interview, or even     observation. The main goal of descriptive research is to describe     systematically the existing phenomena under the study.             Descriptive research covers some subtypes of research methods     such as survey, correlation study, qualitative study, or content analysis.     These subtypes are different not in the data availability, but in their     procedures of data collection and/or analysis.             Survey, for example, is usually designed to investigate a large     population’s perspective about a particular event or problem. Data     collection is commonly conducted through questionnaire administration,     and its data analysis involves quantification.    3.3 Guideline in Conducting Survey Research Through Questionnaire        This part will further discuss about conducting survey research by using    questionnaire.        Did you know?            Questionnaire and interview are the two most common        instruments for survey research.          3.3.1 Overview of a Questionnaire               Questionnaire refers to a structured series of written questions,          which usually generate written responses. Checklists and inventory are        types of questionnaires presenting a list of items in a similar format and        ask respondents to rate. However, questionnaires are one of the most        common methods of collecting data on attitudes and opinions from a        large group of participants.                 According to Griffee (2012), data collected using a questionnaire        can be quantitative or qualitative. A data collection instrument must                                                                                                 67
measure a construct which a researcher states the interest or what to               investigate. The construct-defining process takes place in the literature               review and is reflecting in the purpose section. The instrument requires               validation before administration. Validation is an argument by which               evidence shows the analyzed interpretation based on data to some               extent which reflects the construct. After collecting the data, raw data               must be analyzed and interpreted to be valuable for the research               purposes. Data analysis refers to the process by which a large amount               of raw data is reduced. Interpretation refers to the assigning of meaning               to the reduced data.                 3.3.2 Types of Data Collected Using Questionnaires                      The three types of data about language learners that can be                 collected using questionnaires are factual, behavioral, and attitudinal               data.                                Types of Language Learner Data             Factual data or description include background information about                  learners.             Behavioral data collect data on learners’ lifestyles, habits, and                  actions.             Attitudinal data prompt students to respond on their attitudes,                  beliefs, opinions, interests and values.                        If you plan to use self-report questionnaire, consider the               following issues relating to data you will obtain.    68
Self-Report        Self-report is one of the often-used methods for survey which  involves getting reactions to questions or other stimuli from a  representative sample of a target group, to which the researcher expects  to generalize.        Self-report methods such as questionnaire and interview ask the  person for information directly.        The advantage is they give the person’s perspective; the  disadvantage is there are potential validity problem (i.e., people may  deceive themselves and others).      3.3.3 Types of Questions and Responses           The types of questions and responses used for collecting data      in survey research include:                    Types of Questions and Responses   free-response questions   dichotomous questions   multiple-choice questions   checklists   ranking   ratings      3.3.4 Formulating Questions and Responses           To formulate questions and responses for survey research, you      may ask yourself these questions: How long is your survey? What types    of questions are asked? The following description may help you answer    these questions.                                                                                            69
Questions and Responses in Questionnaires            Types of questions                     What type of questions will you be asking?                 Open-ended questions allow the participant any type of                     response. They provide richer responses, but are hard to analyze                   due to the details of the data obtained.                 Closed questions set up possible responses, such as yes/no,                   Likert scales, and specific choices which make them easier to                   analyze. However, they may not provide the rich responses.            What to Ask Respondents                   Consider questions and goal of asking the question when you form            the question to collect data. Carefully choose and consider wording in            your questions. Make sure it is not too complicated to understand. Before            you conduct the questions, also consider first sampling a small            population to refine question or piloting the questionnaire.                 3.3.5 Quality of Questions                      Another issue regarding questions in survey research is the                 quality. Before distributing the questionnaire, you would want to check               how your questions appear to participants. Here are some criteria of               good questions.                                   Quality of Good Questions                 clear                 direct to the point                 understandable                 appropriate generality and specificity                 relevant                 not leading    70
3.3.6 Quality of Questionnaire           After the questions are ready and combined, the next part to      check is the quality of the whole questionnaire. This is mostly to do    with the outer look and some general views.                      Quality of Good Questionnaire  1. Appearance        Neat and professional      Proper space, easy to read      Consistent positioning of response boxes      Font style with maximized legibility  2. Question Arrangement      Differentiable between instructions and questions      Proper length or concise      If a long questionnaire is necessary, consider its appearance.      Questions are arranged in logical order      Essential questions early; less important questions towards end      Provoking questions should be asked at end.  3. Overall      The questionnaire is designed with coding in mind.      Issues and concerns of the survey highlight:              o “What am I investigating?” (Construct; operational               definition)              o Who will be surveyed? (Population: create a working               population which is a list of persons from your general               population or target population with unit of analysis you               plan, and representing the sample frame)                                                                                            71
3.3.7 Population, Sample, and Sampling Techniques                      Novice researcher may have certain questions regarding                 sampling techniques. How many of the following questions do you               have? Try answering some of the questions you may have.                             Questions about Sampling Techniques                 Q 1: Should you survey everyone or just a sample? (The answer                     depends on how quickly you need a result.)                 Q2: How many should be included?                 Q3: How do you select a sample?                 Q4: How large should it be?                 Q5: How long should a survey be?                 Q6: How to ensure survey reliability and validity?                 Q7: What are some of the ethical issues concerning the design                     and the use of the survey?                 Q8: What should be an acceptable response rate?                        In additions to the questions above, researchers may have               questions about types of sampling. For example: How should I select               my respondents? (Type of sampling: nonprobability or probability), How               many samples should I survey? (Sample size). Study the following               information about types of sampling to help you become clearer.                 Types of Sampling with Working Definition (Griffee, 2012, p. 58)               1. Probability (Subjects selected by random mechanism)                 Simple random: Pull names out of a hat e.g., write the names                   and put in a container and have a person who cannot see the    72
names pull out the desired numbers. This is a good technique if          it is a homogeneous group.        Systematic random: Computer generated numbers to select.        This is a good technique when a sampling frame is large.        Stratified: The sample divided into group called strata.        Operationally, a stratified random sample is taken in the same        way as a simple random sample, but the sampling is done        separately and independently within each stratum” (Levy &        Lemeshow, 1991, p. 99). In this way, you can be reasonably sure        that both groups will be represented in your sample in about the        same proportion as you estimate they are represented in the        population.        Cluster: Group called strata. Cluster sampling is used with very        large populations because lists of unite analysis may not be found        or not even exists. E.g., all 3rd grade ESL students in the state of        Texas. This list may not be found as the K-12 schools are grouped        in the school districts. The first cluster may be identified as all        school in the state. From the list a sample may be made. From        the sample all the elementary schools may be identified. From        this list, the number of 3rd grade classes may be identified and        from this list a sample may be drawn.    2. Nonprobability (Subjects selected by the researcher)      Convenience: A group already formed and easy to use e.g., intact        class, participants at the conference or workshop, volunteer      Purposeful: Knowledgeable and available persons e.g., the        students, the instructors, the stakeholders (parents, employers,        administrators)      Snowball: Selected respondents suggest other respondents e.g.,        each one fond one or each one find several      Quota: Stratified but not randomly chosen e.g., the ratio of        female and male in the program is 60:40 the sample will be        arranged to get the representatives of the 60% of females and        40% of males.                                                                                           73
3.3.8 Data Collection                      When the questionnaire is ready, data collection may start                 right after. Important aspects to consider when collecting data include               how to administer and ethical principles of administration.                        Administering the Questionnaire                      Once the questionnaire is verified and the sample is selected,               the next stage is to distribute it. More questions may arise regarding               this issue.                                  How are you going to survey?            The decision is made based on length and types of questions which are            available as:                   in person                 on paper                 via the Internet                        However, during the pandemic, certain ways of questionnaire               administration is likely to be impossible. Study the following               information on “How to pick the right survey tool for your COVID-19               context” by Dooley (2020) to help you make the decision and find the               best option.                   How to pick the right survey tool for your COVID-19 context                                       (Dooley, 2020)                Original Text: https://researchforevidence.fhi360.org/how-to-pick-the-                          right-survey-tool-for-your-covid-19-context    74
If you are uncertain as to when the face-to-face interactions could  safely resume, consider the following possibilities in your survey context.          The options are proposed into three categories and six types:        1. In-person                  offline mobile forms                paper data collection        2. Remote by text                online surveys                SMS surveys        3. Remote by voice                phone calls                IVR (Interactive Voice Response)             Basic Ethical Principles of Data Collection           While collecting data, there are five principles of ethical issues    in survey research to consider.                 Basic Ethical Principles of Data Collection      Principle 1: No harm should come to the respondents as a result          of their participation in the research. This is the primary ethical        principle governing data collection and it overrides all other        considerations.      Principle 2: The respondent’s right to privacy should always be        respected, and no undue should be brought to bear. That is,        respondents are perfectly within their rights to refuse to answer        questions without offering any explanation, and they have the        right to decide to whom and under what conditions the        information can be made available. No information can be                                                                                           75
published about identifiable persons or organizations without                   their permission.                 Principles 3: Respondents should be provided with sufficient                   initial information about the survey to be able to give their                   informed consent concerning participation and the use of data.                   The key issue here is what we consider ‘sufficient’; I believe that                   providing true information about the extent to which answers will                   be held confidential as well as how and for what purpose the                   data will be used is a minimal requirement. In some contexts,                   the respondents’ consent must be confirmed with their signature;                   however, we should also note that a request for a consent too                   formalized a manner can raise undue suspicions that something                   is not quite right about the survey, and this can reduce the                   response rate.                 Principle 4: In case of children, permission to conduct the survey                   should always be sought from some persons who have sufficient                   authority.                 3.3.9 Data Analysis                      To analyzed data obtained from the surveys, some methods                 commonly used to analyze survey data are:                                   Data Analysis Methods                  1. Descriptive statistics. These include counts, portfolios, measures                   of central tendency, and measure of variation                  2. Correlations. These show relations.                3. Differences. These include chi-square, t test, and analysis of                     variance (ANOVA).                4. Changes. Special forms of t tests and ANOVAs can be used to                     measure change over time    76
When reporting the data, the following guideline can be  applied.                    Guideline for Reporting Data   Top line data: reporting how many respondents answer certain        questions in certain ways   More detail description by reporting bivariate or multivariate        analysis. Gives more details about particular subgroups and      subcategories.   Explain data within the framework of the research aims and      objectives.   Main statistical methods for analysis: frequency, proportions,      percentages, ratios   Calculate the average: mode median and mean    3.3.10 Data Analysis        When collecting data using surveys, researchers should be aware    of pros and cons of the data as follows:    Pros Cons     can be anonymous (avoids       might not get careful feedback     embarrassment of recipient)   wording can bias responses                                   impersonal   can be inexpensive to          doesn’t get full story     administer (many multimedia   could have design flaws     tools)                        often get low response rate                                   assumes no literacy issues   easy to compare and analyze   administer to many people                                                                      77
 can get lots of data quickly     problems with incomplete   many sample questionnaires         responses       already exist                   respondent has choice of   can hit wide geographic areas      whether to complete or not   no interview bias   high validity (if well-          must be kept short                                     respondents may lack     constructed)   open-ended questions utilizes      information or self-awareness                                       to complete     respondents’ words              differences in verbal ability   closed-ended questions           open-ended questions are                                       time consuming to analyze     provides exact info needed by     and may reflect measures     researcher                        need validation   closed-ended questions are     easy to analyze   useful for exploration as well     as confirmation          3.4 Guideline in Conducting Survey Research Through Interview               This part will further discuss about conducting survey research by using          interview.               3.4.1 Overview of an Interview               An interview is a direct face-to-face attempt to obtain reliable and valid          measures in the form of verbal responses from one or more respondents. It is        a conversation in which the roles of the interviewer and the respondent change        continually.                 When to use?               • Required detailed information.               • Obtaining data related to emotions, experience and feeling.    78
• Obtaining data based on sensitive issues.        • Obtaining data based on privileged information.            (e.g., what students say about rubric)        Interview can be used to        • Prepare for a set of questions        • Follow-up to a questionnaire        • Triangulate with other methods        3.4.2 How to conduct an interview        The interview can be conducted as follows: individual, group interview,  focus group (consisting of 6-9 people who are brought together by a trained  moderator. It revolves around a prompt introduced by the moderator to  ‘focus’ the discussion. The moderator does not adopt a neutral role. It focuses  on interaction and emphasizes ‘collective view’).        3.4.3 Types of interviews        • Structured interview                 • aim to maximize comparison across responses to interview        questions                 • pre-set list of questions asked in a fixed order               • e-mail interview               • large number of subjects        • Semi-structured interview               • a list of pre-prepared questions (but used it as a guide)               • open to important but unforeseen info. or points of discussion               • never be repeated in exactly the same way with each interview        3.4.4 Developing an interview guide        • Write suitable warm-up questions        • This should call for an extended response based on something with        which the interviewee is very familiar.        • Analyze, apply, review, revise                                                                                                 79
• When you’ve planned your guide, analyze it carefully from the point               of view of the interviewee and try to spot potential difficulties or               opportunities, then conduct a pilot interview and review the guide               critically. Revise it where necessary and be prepared to develop it               further as the interview progresses.               3.4.5 Question Types               Opening                        Begin by inviting a fairly lengthy response.                      Provide a natural ‘springboard’ for further questions.                 Check/reflect                      When in any doubt about whether you’ve understood                 something, it’s worth checking this or reflecting a statement back to the               speaker. This may prompt the speaker to develop a point further.                        - What did you mean when you said xxx?                      - Am I right to say that xxxx?                      - Can you clarify xxx?               Follow-up                      When the speaker has raised something that there is more to               be discovered on this topic, the interviewer may decide to follow it up               Probe (to ask questions in order to find things out, especially things    that other people do not want you to know)                        It is necessary to establish how the interviewees see the world               and how they structure their understanding of it, which will involve               more careful questioning designed to elicit from the speaker               categorizations or rankings.                        • What do people think about X? Vs. What do you think about  X?                        • Could you say something more about that?    80
• Do you have further examples of this?  Structuring          It may be necessary to mark a shift of topic by using structuring  moves such as ‘Can we move on to….?, I would like now to introduce  another topic..          It may be necessary to mark a shift of topic by using structuring  moves such as ‘Can we move on to….?, I would like now to introduce  another topic..  3.4.6 Techniques for questioning  • Progressive focusing  • How do you feel about pre-reading activities?  • Could you describe some of the activities you use?  • What are the pros and cons of that activity?  • Would you use it with beginners?  • If you had to recommend a particular type of pre-reading activity to a  new teacher, what would it be?  • What features made you choose this?  • Examples of use from your own teaching Variations?    Some Dos and Don’ts  Dos  • Listen carefully (e.g., non-verbally say, I’m listening)  • Offer supportive feedback (e.g., ‘hmm’, ‘yes’)  • Respond to emotion (give interviewee a chance to talk about it)  • Let the interview take its own shape – let the interviewee discover  things as well  Don’ts  • Close off interview space  • Interpret for the interviewee                                                                                        81
• Judge (e.g., offer moral comment, advice, or consolation)               • Strict to the topics you think are important               • Interrupt unthinkingly               3.4.7 How to prepare yourself before the interview               • Prepare questions               • Predict answers (so that you know what you should ask later)               • Set the time and tell the subject (not applicable to free interview)               • The second and especially the third method will catch the reader's               eye, so make sure you are quoting something important.               • Don't bore the reader with uninteresting quotes or statements that are               trivial or obvious.               • Citing the interviewees and using quotes. There are several ways you               can refer to the information from the interviews:                        (1) summarize in your own words what he or she said,                      (2) use short quotes (for phrases and one or two short                      sentences) that you embed into a paragraph, and,                      (3) use a separate indented paragraph (a \"block\") for longer                      quotes (three or more sentences).               • Identifying the Interviewees.               • In the method section of the paper you should describe who each of               the interviewees are, why you asked them to participate in the study,               and how you located them.               • Interviewees who are professionals or \"experts\" on some topic should               be identified by name, profession, where they work, the details of their               expertise, and any other information about them that is relevant to               your project.               • Other interviewees should be identified by name, age, marital status,               occupation, and why specifically they were selected for your project.    82
• In some projects the identities of the interviewees must NOT be        mentioned in your paper.        • You must always obtain permission (as part of the informed consent)        to mention their names in your paper.        • For people who wish to remain anonymous, you can mention their        real age, marital status, occupation, and any other information about        them that is relevant to your project. BUT USE A FALSE NAME.        • Also, never mention ANY information (like occupation) if that        information is so specific or unique that it could reveal who they are.        3.4.8 Approaches to analysis        • Make notes immediately after the interview, paying particular  attention to relational issues.        • Reflect on the interview from the perspective of the relationship of  interviewer and interviewee, its broader context (professional setting, previous  interviews, etc.) and its development. Note points to bear in mind.        • Read the interview from an interactional perspective. How does the  relationship between interviewer and interviewee develop? Highlight and  comment on any key shifts or passages.        3.4.9 Approaches to analysis        • Look for clues to shifts in perspective or orientation (e.g., explicit        comments about perceived formulations to earlier ones).        • Look closely at the way the interviewee’s positions develop. Where        possible, relate later formulations to earlier ones.        • Highlight problematic passages.        • Sum up implications of the above for a developing analysis.        If possible, arrange a further interview to the process of clarification.                                                                                                 83
3.4.10 Approaches to analysis                     Pros Cons         get full range and depth of  can be time consuming        information                           can be hard to analyze and         develop relationship with          compare        respondent                            can be costly         can be more flexible with  interviewer can bias client’s        respondent                           responses (ex: eagerness to         accurate information               please interviewer, antagonism         interviewer has control and        towards interviewer, interviewer        can give help if necessary           may seek information based on         can record using multi-media       their preconceived notions)         characteristics of respondents  geographic limitations        can be evaluated (tone,               respondents bias (tend to        expression, hesitation)              please, create false image for         one interviewer provides           interviewer, or to end interview        uniformity                           quickly)         allow for probing and follow-  embarrassment        up questions                          untrained interviewers could         insight into respondents “way distort data        of thinking”, opinions and  measures need validation        feelings         can provide quick turnaround        (in-person, telephone or email        format)         high validity if constructed well    84
3.5 Avtivities  Activity 1: What is self-report?   • Directions: Please read all 15 statements. Then select 5 statements that most   closely reflect your beliefs about how English as a second language is learned and   how English as a second language should be taught.   • Please choose 5 statements by circling the numbers here:           12345         6 7 8 9 10         11 12 13 14 15   Teachers’ belief inventories (Johnson, 1992).   1. Language can be thought of as a set of grammatical structures which are learned   consciously and controlled by the language learner.   2. As long as ESL students understand what they are saying, they are actually learning   the language.   3. When ESL students make oral errors, it helps to correct them and later teach a   short lesson explaining why they made that mistake.   4. As long as ESL students listen to, practice, and remember the language which   native speakers use; they are actually learning the language.   5. ESL students generally need to understand the grammatical rules of English in   order to become fluent in the language.   6. When ESL students make oral errors, it usually helps them to provide them with   lots of oral practice with the language patterns which seem to cause them difficulty.   7. Language can be thought of as meaningful communication and is learned   subconsciously in non-academic, social situations.   8. If ESL students understand some of the basic grammatical rules of the language   they can usually create lots of new sentences on their own.   9. Usually it is more important for ESL students to focus on what they are trying to   say and not how to say it.                                                                                                          85
10. If ESL students practice the language patterns of native speakers they can make   up new sentences based on those language patterns which they have already   practiced.   11. It is important to provide clear, frequent, precise presentations of grammatical;   structures during English language instruction.   12. Language can be described as a set of behaviors which are mastered through   lots of drill and practice with the language patterns of native speakers.   13. When ESL students make oral errors, it is best to ignore them, as long as you can   understand what they are trying to say.   14. ESL students usually need to master some of the basic listening and speaking   skills before they can begin to read and write.   15. It’s not necessary to actually teach ESL students how to speak English. They   usually begin speaking English on their own.    86
Activity 2: What are some of the instruments employed to collect self-report    data? Based on the following research titles, let’s have a guess how the author    collected the data from these studies.    Research title             Research     Research  Expected data/                               purposes     instruments data analysis                                            used    1. A Study of Teachers’    Beliefs, Perceptions, and    Practices of Multiple    Assessments in Thai EFL    Classroom    2. Why Not Non-native    Varieties of English as    Listening Comprehension    Test Input?    3. Exploring the    Development of ‘Interest’    in Learning English as a    Foreign/Second Language    4. Examining How    Teachers’ Beliefs about    Communicative Language    Teaching Affect Their    Instructional and    Assessment Practices: A    Qualitative Study of EFL    University Instructors in    Colombia                                                                       87
Activity 3: How do you feel as a respondent?        • Check the website http://www.public.asu.edu/~eagle/spssintro/esteem.htm    Case #______  Sample Questionnaire  Self Esteem Study  1. What is your gender? (circle one)    f Female  m Male    2. What is your age in years? ____    3. What is the highest level of education that you have completed? (circle one number)        1 No formal education    2 Some grade school    3 Completed grade school Skip to Question 5.    4 Some high school    5 Completed high school    6 Some college    7 Completed college    8 Some graduate work                  Please answer Question 4.    9 A graduate degree    4. If you have attended college, what was your most recent major?        ____________________________    5. What is your height? _____ feet _____ inches    88
Please indicate your level of agreement with Strongly                Strongly  the following statements (check one box for Disagree Disagree Agree  Agree                                                                       (4)  each statement):                                  (1) (2) (3)            6. I feel that I’m a person of worth, at least                      on an equal basis with others.                                                                         7. I feel that I have a number of good                  qualities.                                                               8. All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a                    failure.    9. I am able to do things as well as most               other people.    10. I feel I do not have much to be proud               of.    Self-Esteem Study Codebook    VARIABLE  FORMAT DESCRIPTION / VARIABLE LABEL / CODED  NAME                 VALUE / VALUE LABEL  CASENO            Numeric    Case number  SEX       Width = 3  Case number            Decimals            =0              String 1. What is your gender?            Width = 1                         f Female                       m Male                                                                         89
AGE      Numeric    2. What is your age in years?      EDUC     Width = 2  (Code actual age in years.)               Decimals      MAJOR    =0      HT_FEET      HT_INCH  Numeric    3. What is the highest level of education               Width = 1  that you have completed?               Decimals               =0         Education level|  6 Some college                          1 No formal       7 Completed college                          education         8 Some graduate work                                            9 A graduate degree                          2 Some grade                          school                            3 Completed                          grade school                            4 Some high                          school                            5 Completed                          high school                 String     4. If you have attended college, what was               Width =    your most recent major?               25                          Most recent college major                 Numeric    5. What is your height?               Width = 1  Height in feet               Decimals               =0                 Numeric 5. What is your height?               Width = 4 Height in inches    90
Decimals           =1    ESTEEM1  Numeric    6. I feel I am a person of worth, at least           Width = 1  on an equal basis with others.           Decimals           =0         I am a person of worth                        1 Strongly disagree                        2 Disagree                        3 Agree                        4 Strongly agree                        (Use the same codes as above for all                      ESTEEM items below.)    ESTEEM2  Numeric    7. I feel that I have a number of good  ESTEEM3  Width = 1  qualities.           Decimals  ESTEEM4  =0         I have good qualities             Numeric    8. All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am           Width = 1  a failure.           Decimals           =0         I am a failure                        (Reverse codes before computing overall                      self-esteem score.)             Numeric    9. I am able to do things as well as most           Width = 1  other people.           Decimals           =0         I can do things as well                                                                        91
ESTEEM5  Numeric    10. I feel I do not have much to be               Width = 1  proud of.               Decimals               =0         I am not proud                            (Reverse codes before computing overall                          self-esteem score.)          • As a respondent, do you like the overall look of the questionnaire?        • Do you agree with the way the items were framed?    Then do task 5.    92
Activity 4: There are many issues and concerns involved with constructing a  questionnaire such as stating its purpose, defining a construct, deciding on the  participants, constructing a pilot study, and validating the questionnaire including  selecting a form of reliability to report. Which could you begin on your own and which  would you need help to do?  I know how to begin ……………………..……….I would need help  1. _________________________ … 1. _________________________  2. _________________________ … 2. _________________________  3. _________________________ … 3. _________________________  (Introduction to second language)    Activity 5: Watch video clips in the following YouTube    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs-gLeYuDZw    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTuj57uXWlk    Then, study the explanation of population and sampling techniques from the website  https://www.umsl.edu/~lindquists/sample.html and match the information and the  terms.    Terminology           Explanation  1. population         A. The portion of the population to which the                        researcher has reasonable access; may be a  2. target population  subset of the target population                        B. A list of all the elements in the population                        from which the sample is drawn                                                                                 93
                                
                                
                                Search
                            
                            Read the Text Version
- 1
 - 2
 - 3
 - 4
 - 5
 - 6
 - 7
 - 8
 - 9
 - 10
 - 11
 - 12
 - 13
 - 14
 - 15
 - 16
 - 17
 - 18
 - 19
 - 20
 - 21
 - 22
 - 23
 - 24
 - 25
 - 26
 - 27
 - 28
 - 29
 - 30
 - 31
 - 32
 - 33
 - 34
 - 35
 - 36
 - 37
 - 38
 - 39
 - 40
 - 41
 - 42
 - 43
 - 44
 - 45
 - 46
 - 47
 - 48
 - 49
 - 50
 - 51
 - 52
 - 53
 - 54
 - 55
 - 56
 - 57
 - 58
 - 59
 - 60
 - 61
 - 62
 - 63
 - 64
 - 65
 - 66
 - 67
 - 68
 - 69
 - 70
 - 71
 - 72
 - 73
 - 74
 - 75
 - 76
 - 77
 - 78
 - 79
 - 80
 - 81
 - 82
 - 83
 - 84
 - 85
 - 86
 - 87
 - 88
 - 89
 - 90
 - 91
 - 92
 - 93
 - 94
 - 95
 - 96
 - 97
 - 98
 - 99
 - 100
 - 101
 - 102
 - 103
 - 104
 - 105
 - 106
 - 107
 - 108
 - 109
 - 110
 - 111
 - 112
 - 113
 - 114
 - 115
 - 116
 - 117
 - 118
 - 119
 - 120
 - 121
 - 122
 - 123
 - 124
 - 125
 - 126
 - 127
 - 128
 - 129
 - 130
 - 131
 - 132
 - 133
 - 134
 - 135
 - 136
 - 137
 - 138
 - 139
 - 140
 - 141
 - 142
 - 143
 - 144
 - 145
 - 146
 - 147
 - 148
 - 149
 - 150
 - 151
 - 152
 - 153
 - 154
 - 155
 - 156
 - 157
 - 158
 - 159
 - 160
 - 161
 - 162
 - 163
 - 164
 - 165
 - 166
 - 167
 - 168
 - 169
 - 170
 - 171
 - 172
 - 173
 - 174
 - 175
 - 176
 - 177
 - 178
 - 179
 - 180
 - 181
 - 182
 - 183
 - 184
 - 185
 - 186
 - 187
 - 188
 - 189
 - 190
 - 191
 - 192
 - 193
 - 194
 - 195
 - 196
 - 197
 - 198
 - 199
 - 200
 - 201
 - 202
 - 203
 - 204
 - 205
 - 206
 - 207
 - 208
 - 209
 - 210
 - 211
 - 212
 - 213
 - 214
 - 215
 - 216
 - 217
 - 218
 - 219
 - 220
 - 221
 - 222
 - 223
 - 224
 - 225
 - 226
 - 227
 - 228
 - 229
 - 230
 - 231
 - 232
 - 233
 - 234
 - 235
 - 236
 - 237
 - 238
 - 239
 - 240
 - 241
 - 242
 - 243
 - 244
 - 245
 - 246
 - 247
 - 248
 - 249
 - 250
 - 251
 - 252
 - 253
 - 254
 - 255
 - 256
 - 257
 - 258
 - 259
 - 260
 - 261
 - 262
 - 263
 - 264
 - 265
 - 266
 - 267
 - 268
 - 269
 - 270
 - 271
 - 272
 - 273
 - 274
 - 275
 - 276
 - 277
 - 278
 - 279
 - 280
 - 281
 - 282
 - 283
 - 284
 - 285
 - 286
 - 287
 - 288
 - 289
 - 290
 - 291
 - 292
 - 293
 - 294
 - 295
 - 296
 - 297
 - 298
 - 299
 - 300
 - 301
 - 302
 - 303
 - 304
 - 305
 - 306
 - 307
 - 308
 - 309
 - 310
 - 311
 - 312
 - 313
 - 314
 - 315
 - 316
 - 317
 - 318
 - 319
 - 320
 - 321
 - 322
 - 323
 - 324
 - 325
 - 326