Giáo Trình Phương Pháp Nghiên Cứu Khoa Học Trong Kinh Doanh (NXB Tài Chính 2014) - Nguyễn Đình Thọ_ 676 Trang

Chuong 15.Mil hi\"h hoi qui da hie'\", PATH va MMR 623 Hinh U7.MB hinh nghicn ein. Ch5'lluong lin hi~u Chat h.n;mg (.! Trung thanh • Rii rang chuong trlnh 1-'4 ... chuong trinh ·Nh.t quan ·Tin c3y DSu 1I.r chtrollg trinh coa. Ilay thiet ke qui trinh phan rich de the' xac djnh duoc car trong so hoi qui fJ trong mo hlnh cung voi h~ so phu hop long quat R '? M' b. l3ay giQ, nhll nghien cuu nay muon xern xet eo Sl,I' khac bi~t giu'a cocdc trong so hoi qui f3 trong InO hinh tren khac nhau gilta hoc covien theo hoc cac chuong trlnh MBA trong nurrc va MBA lien cokit voi mfoe ngolli khong? Hay cho biet bien nao the lam bien di'@utiel? Bien cli'Cutiet nay i::J dang nao nell n6 lam duoc chuc nllng CLIObien dieu tiel? Hay hoach dinh qui trlnh phan tich m6 hinh vOi bien die\" tiet do? 8. Xay dung mo hinh nghien CtIU Slr d~JI1ghoi qui da bien va hoach djnh qui trlnh phan rich rn6 hinh nay? 9. Xiiy dung mo hlnh nghien CtIU Slr dung rno hinh PATH va hoach dinh qui trinh phfin tich rno hlnh nay? 10. Xiiy d~g rno hinh nghien elru trong do co bien !.rung gian va bien dieu tiel va hoach dinh qui trinh phan tim rno hinh nay?

624 PIlltong phdp nghien cuu khoa hoc trong kinh doanh TAl LI~U DOC THEM CHUONG 15 Tabachnick BG &: Fidell LS (2007), Usillg Multivariate Statistics, 5lhed, Boston: Pearson Education: Tai li~u nay viet day du va chi tiet ve cac maphuong phap phan tich da bien bao gom hinh PATH. Ho R (2006), Handbook of Ulllvariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation willi SPSS, Boca Raton FL: Chapman &: Hall: Tai Ii~u nay huong d~n each dung SPSS de xu' Iy hoi qui va cac phucmg phap phan tlch mada bien khac bao gam trong do co hinh PATH. Blalock MH (1971, ed), Causa! Models i\" tile Social Sciences, London: veMacMillan: Day 10 tiii Ii~u truyen thong rna hlnh PATH, t~p hQP nhieu vebai viet khac nhau mo hinh nay, La tai lj~u can thiet cho cac ban thich vethu PATI!.

ni li~L(Iiii d~n 625 .. ,. .... ~ TAl LI1;:UDA DAN Agar Mil (1986),Speakillg of [tllIIography. Newbury Park CA: Sage. Aguinis H (1995), Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research, JOllmal of Management. 21(6). 1141-58. Anderson PF (1983), Marketing, scientific progress. and scientific method, !ollrnal of Marketing. 47 Fall, 18-31. Anderson IC & Gerbing OW (1988), Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychologiml BullrtilJ. 103(3).411-23. APA (20()9), PrMicnlioll Mallllni of lire American Psychological Assockuion, 6'hed,washingto»: American Psychological Association. Argyrls C & Schon DA (1978), Orgmrisatiorrai Learning: A Theory of Actioll Perspective. Reading MA. Addison-Wesley. Auerbach CF & Silverstein LB (2003), Qllalitative Data: All Introduction /0 Car/illg and Allalysis. New York: New York University Press. Bobbie ER (1986), Tile Practice of Social Research, 4·hed, Belmont CA: Wadsworth. Bacharach SB (1989).Organisational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Mallagellleul Revietu, 14(4),496-515. Bagozzl RP (1980),Causal Models ill Marketillg, New York: Wiley. Bagozzi RP (1994).Measurement in marketing research: Basic principles of questionnaire design, trong Principles of Marketillg Research, Bagozzi RP(ed). Cambridge MA: Basil BlacweU,1-49. Baron ltc\\ll & Kenny DA (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Persollality alld Social Psyclrology. 51(6), 1173-82.

626 Phuong phap nghien Ct,U khoa hoc trong kinh doanh Belslcy DA, Kuh IS& Welsch RE (2004), Regression Diagnostics: IdelllifyillR lufluentia; Dnta and Source ofCol/inearit!/, Hoboken NJ: Wiley. Berry WD (1993), Understanding Regression Assumptions, Newbury Park CA: Sage. Blalock 11M (1964), Causal Inferences ill Nonexperimental Research, Chapel Iliff NC: University of North Carolina Press. Blalock Mil (1971, ed), Causal Models in the Social Sciences, London: MacMillan. Blalock HM (1982), Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Sciences, Beverly I !ills CA: Sage. Bollen KA (1989), Structure! Eql/Qtlons with Latent Variables, New York: Wiley. Bollen KA & Iloyle RH (1991), Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination, Social Forces, 69(2), 479-504. Bray J H & Maxwell SE (1985), Multivariate Analysis of Variance, Beverly Hills CA: Sage. Bruce CS (1994), Research students' early experiences of the dissertation literature review, Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 217-29. Campbell TO ('1960), Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity, American Psychologist, lS, 546-33. Campbell TO & Fiske OW (1959), Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81- 105. Campbell JP, Daft RL &: Hulin Cl, (1982), What to Stlldy: Generating and Developing Research Qllestions, Beverly Hills CA: Sage. Carmines EG & Zeller RA (1979), Reliability and Validity Assessment, Beverly Hills CA: Sage. Carroll JD, Green PE & Chaturvedi A (1997), MathematiCJII Tools for Applied Mllitit'llriate Analysis, revised ed, San Diego: Academic Press.

TIIi li~u d5 <15\" 627 Cattell RB (1966), The scree test for the number of factor, MlIlilivariate Behtnnoral Research, 1 April,245-76. Chalmers AF (1999), Wlwt I, This Thlllg Called Science? 3'ded, Cambridge: Hackett. Chang $oj, van Witteloostuijn A & Eden L (1010), From the editors: Common method variance in intemational business research, 101\"1lilt ofllltC'TIllltiolllll Busines» Studie», 41,178-84. Chaplin Wf (1991), The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology, 10llrlllllof Personality, 59(2), 143-78. Chiles Til (2003), Process theorizing: Too important to ignore in a kaleidic world, Aclltirmy of Mmrngemellt uarnillg and Education, 2(3), 288-91. Chow GC (1960), Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions, Econometrica, 28(3), 591-605. Christensen L (1988), Expcrimclllnl Mflhodologtj, Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Churchill Jr GA (1979), A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Mlrrkeling Research. 26(1), 64-73. Coghlan D & Hrnnnick T (2005). Doing Action Research ill Your Oum Orgrrlliza/ioll. 2''''ed, London: Sage. Cohen J ('1977). Stntistico! Power A,wlysis for tire Belunnouro! Sciences. Revised edition, New York: Academic Press. Cook TO & Carnpell 01' (1979). Qllasi-Experimelrtatioll, Chicago: Rand McNally College. Cooper H (1998). Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. 3\"'ed, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Corbin J & Strauss A (1990), Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluation critera, Quailtnthle Sociology, 13(1),3-21. Cortina JM, Chen G & Dunlap WP (2001), Testing interaction effects in USREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Orgllnizational Research Methods. 4(4), 324-60.

628 Phuong phap nghien cuu khoa hoc trong kinh doanh Cote JA & Buckley R (1987), Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across 70 construct validation studies, [ournnl of Marketillg Research,24, 315-18. Coyne [1' (1997), Sampling in qualitative research: Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?, JO'llmal O'f Advanced Nursing, 26, 623-30. Crampton S & Wagner J (1994), Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect, lournn! of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 67-76. Crano WD & Brewer MB (2002), Principles and Methods of Social Research, 2\"\"ed, Mahwad NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Craig CC (1936), On the frequency (unction of xy, Allllais of Mafhelllatimi Statistics, 7, 1-15. Creswell JW (2003), Research Design: Qrmlilalive, Quan.titative and Mixed Mel/rod.s AI)IIY(}aclr~s,2nded, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Creswell }W & Clark WI. (2007), Designing and Conducting Mixed Me/hods Research, Thousand Oaks CA, Sage. Cronbach LJ (1951), Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psyclrorlletrika, 16(3), 297-334. Cronbach LJ (1987), Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed, Psychological Bulletin, 102(3),414-17. Cronbach LJ & Meehl PE (1955), Construct validity in psychological tests, Psydrological Bulletin, 52,281-302. Daengbuppha J, Ilemmington N & Wilkes K (2006), Using grounded theory to model visitor experiences at heritage sites: Methodological and practical issues, Qualitative Market Research, 9(4), 367-88. Davis D & Cosenza RM (1993), Busllless Researcn for Decision Making, 3\"'ed, Belmon CA: Wadsworth. Daymon C & Iiolloway I (2002), Qualitative Research Methods ill Public Relations and Marketillg COlIIllllllJications, London: Routledge.

l'ili li~u(Iii d~\" 629 Demaris A (2004), Regression witlr Social Data, Hoboken NJ: Wiley. Denzin K (1978), Tire Research Act, 2n\"ed, New York: McGraw-Hill. Denzin MJ< & Lincoln YS (2005, ed), Tile Sage Handbook of QllOlitative Research, 3,ded, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. DcVellis Rf (2003), Scale Development: Tlleory and Applications, 2'''ed, Newbury Park CA: Sage. Dey I (1993), Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists, London: Routledge. Diarnantopoulos A & Souchon AL (1999), Measuring export information use: scale development and validation, Journal of Business Research, 46(1),1-14. Diamantopoulos A & Winklhoffer HM (2001), Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development, [ourna! of Mnrk,>tillgResenrcn, 38 May, 269-77. Dubin R (1978), Theory Buiiding, New York: The Free Press. Dunlap WP & Kemery ER (J 987), Falure to detect moderating effects: Is multicollinearity the problems\", Psychological Bnllctin, 102(3), 418-20. Dunn-Rankin P (1983), Scaling Mel/loris, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Duntemnn Gil (1989), Principal Camponelll Allalysis, ~ewbury Park CA: Sage. Easly RW, Madden CS & Dunn MG (2000), Conducting marketing science: the role of replication in the research process, Journal of Business Researcn, 48, 83-92. Ehrenberg ASC (1994), Theory or well-based results: Which comes first, trong Research Traditions in Marketing, Laurent G & Lilien GL &. Pras B (eds), Boston: Kluwer Acadamic, 79-108. Eisenhartdt KM (1989), Building theories from case study research, Academy of Mallagement Review, 14(4),532-50.

630 PlwO'l1gphap I1ghien ciru khoa hoc trong kinh doanh Eisenhardt KM & Bourgeois LJ (198B), Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory, Acadellly of Mnlln8~lIIellt lotimal, 31(4), 737-70. Feldman DC (2004), What we are talking about when we talk about theory?, IUllmal of Mallagement. 30 (5), 565-7. Field A (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage. Fishbein 'vI & Ajzen I (1975), Belief, Attitllde, Intention and Behaviollr: All IlItrodlictlOlI to 71wory and Research,Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. Fornell C (1982), A second generation of multivariate analysis: An overview, trang A Secolld Generation of Mliitivariate Allalysis: Met/lods, Farnell C (ed), New York: Praeger, 1, 1-21. Freedman l.s & Schatzkin A (1992), Sample size far studying intermediate endpoints within interventian trials of observational studies, Alllc, lean I(mmal of epidellliologtj, 136, 1148-59. Gamst G, Meyers LS & Guarino AJ (2008), Allalysis of Variance Designs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Garson GD (2002), Guide to Writillg Empirical Papers, Theses, (llld Dissertation\" New York: Marcel Dekker. Ceerz C (1973), Tire interpretaticn of Cultures, New York: Basic Books, Cerbing WD & Anderson JC (1988), An update paradigm far scale development incorporating unidimensionaliry and its assessments, [ournol of Marketillg Research, 25(2), 186-92. Glaser B & Strauss A (1967), TI,e Disccuerq of Groullded Tlreory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine. Gorsuch RL (1983), Factor Analysis, 2\"\"ed, Hillsdale N]: Lawrence Erlbaum. Gaulding C (2002), Groullded 71lcory: A Pmctical Guide for Mallagemellt, Business alld Markel Researchers, Landon: Sage. Green S6 (1991), I low many subjects does it take to' do a regressian analysis?, Multivariate Behtnnora! Research, 26(3), 499-510.

ni li~udii,I~n 631 Greenbaum TL (1998), The Handbook for Focus Group Research, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Creence jC & Caracelli V) (2003), Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice, trong Hnnttbook of Mixed Methods ill Social alld eBehauiora! Research, Tashakkori A & Teddlie (eds), Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 91-111. Greene WI I (2003), Econometric Analysis 5'''ed, Upper Saddle River Nj: Prentice-Hall. Griffith DA & Lusch RF (2007), Getting marketers to invest in firm-specific capital, JOllrnal of Marketillg, 71 january, 129-45. Hunt, S.D. (2000), A General Theory of Competition, Sage, Guba EG & Lincoln YS (2005), Paradigmactic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, rrong The Sage Hanbook of Qllalitative nesearcll, 3\"'cd, Dcnzin NK & Lincoln YS (eds), Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 191-215. Hair Jr, Black we, Babin BJ, Anderson RIO, & Tatham RL (2006), MII/lival'iale Data Allalysis, 6\"'ed, Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice- Hall. Hardy MA (1993), Re/lressioll with Dummy Variables, Newbury Park CA: Sage. Hart C (2009), Doing. a Literature R,'view: Releasing ti,e Social Science Research Imngination, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Hart S], Webb J R & Jones MY (1994), Export marketing research and the effect of export experience in industrial SMEs, International Marketillg Review, 11(6),4-22. Hattie J (1985), Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items, Applied Psychological Measllflmlelll, 9(2), 139-64. Hendrickson A E & White PO (1964), Promax: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure, British /01lrlla1 of Mathematical alld Statistical PsycJlology, 17, 65-70.

632 Phuong phap nghien ciru khoa hoc trong kinh doanh Ho R (2006), Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation witfl SPSS, Boca Raton FL: Chapman &< Hall. Huber GP ('1991), Organisational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, Organisational Science, 2(1),88-115. Hunt SO (1991), Modem Marketillg Theoru: Critical Issues ill the Philosopflyof Marketilrg Science, Cincinnati OH: South-Western. Huynh H &; Feldt LS (1970), Condition under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F distributions, /ournal of tire Americall Statistical Association, 65, 1582-89. Huynh H &< Feldt LS (1976), Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs, /oumal of Educational Statistics, 1,69-72. Iversen GR &< Norpoth H (1987), Analysis of Variance, Newbury Park CA: Sage. Jaccard J, Turrisi R & Wan CK (1990), Interaction Effects ill Multiple Regression, Newbury Park CA: Sage. Jack EP & Raturl AS (2006), Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research, Management Research News, 29(6),345-57. Jackson GB (1980), Methods for integrative reviews, Review of Educational Research, 50(3), 438-60. Jaynes ET (2003), Probability Theory: The Logic of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ick TO (1979), Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-11. Io M-S (2000), Controlling social-desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirec t questioning in structural equation models, /)sychology & Marketing, 17(2),137-48. Johanson J &< Vahlne J-E (1977), The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign

TM li~lIdo d~n 633 market commitments, jOIlr11alof International Business Studies, 8(1),23- 32. Johnson P & Ouberley J (2000), Urrderstandi,rg Management Research: All tntroauction to Epistemology, London: Sage. Johnson RE, Rosen CC & Ojurdjevic E (2011), Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs, lormral of Applied Psychology, 96(4),744-61. Johnston Wj, Leach MP & Liu AH (1999), Theory testing using case studies in business-to-business research, Industria! Marketing Manllgement, 28, 201-13. [oreskog KG (1971), Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests, Psyclromet ricn, 36(2), 109-33. [oreskog KG (1974), Analysing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices, trong COiltemporary Developments ill Mnthe,uatical Psychology, Krantz OH, Atkinson RC, Luce RD & Supes P (eds), 2, 1- 56. joselyn RW (1977), Des,g,lillg tire Marketing Research Project, New York: Mason-Charter. Kaiser l If (1958), The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis, Psycirometric{J, 23, 187-200. Kaiser H1\"(1974), An index of factorial simplicity, I'sycliomelrica, 39,31-36. Kalton G (1983), introduction 10 Survey Samplillg, Beverly Hills CA: Sage. Kaplan A (1964), Tire Conduct of Inquiry, New York: Harper & Row. Kazdin AE (1980), Researcli Design ill Clinical Psychology, New York: Harper & Row. Kelseman HJ, Algina J & Kowalchuk RK (2001), The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review, BritisJr [oumal of MatJrematical lind Statist ical PsycJrology, 54, 1-20. Kerlinger FN (1986), Forllldations of BeJravioural Research, 3\"'ed, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

634 Plwong phap nghien cuu khoa hoc trong kinh doanh Kline TJB, Sulsky LM & Rever-Moriyama SO (2000), Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection, The [ournul of Psychology, 134(4),401-21. Kim j-O & Mueller CW (1978a), Introduction /(J Factor Analysis: What 11Is alld Hoto to Do It, Beverly Hills CA: Sage. Kim j-O & Mueller CW (1978b), Factor Allalysis: Statistical Methods (/lid Practical lssues, Beverly Hills CA: Sage. Kish L (1965). SlIrtl(!Y Sompling, New York: Wiley. Kitzinger J (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research partipants, Sociology of Health and Illness. 16(1), 103-21. Kline RB (2004). Beyolld Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods ill Behauiora; Research, Washington: American Psychological Association. Kline I~B(2011), Prillciples alld Practice afStructural Equation Mode/i\"g, 3'\\~ed, New York: Guilford. Kraemer He & Thiemann S (1987), How Mnny Subjects? Statistical Power AI1!IIysis in I~esl'flrch,Newbury Park CA: Sage. Krueger RA ('19980), Focus Grollp Kit 4: Moilernting Foucus Groul'S, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Krueger RA (1998b), Focus Grollp Kit 3: Developing Questions for Focus GrOllps,Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Krueger RA (1998c), Focus Grollp Kit 6: Analysing & Reporting FOIICltsGroup Results, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Kuehl RO (2000), Design of Experiments. Pacific Grove: Thomson Learning. Kuhn MH & McPartland TS (1954), An empirical investigation of self- attitudes, American Sociological Review. 19(1).68-76. Kuhn T (1970). The Structure of SCIentific Revolutions, 2nded. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Talli~ll et5 dAn 635 Langley A (1999), Strategies for theorizing form process data, A((tdemy of Malln8e\",ellt/~eviL~(),24(4), 691-710. Lee TW (1999), USillg Qua/itatiue Mel/lOds in Organiuuiona! Research, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Lehtonen R & Pahkinen E (2004), Practical Methods for Design and Analysis of Complex SlirveyS, 2oJcd, Chichester: Wiley. Lewin K (1945), The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sociometry, 8(2), 126-36. Lewis MW & Grimes AJ (1999), Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms, At:ademy of Management Review, 24(4), 672-90. Likert RA (1932), A technique (or the measurement of attitudes, Arc/liues of Psycilology, 140, 5-53. Lindell MK & Whitney DJ (2001), Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs, Journal of Applied Psyrilo/(18Y, 86( 1), 114-21. Lord I'M & NOVIck MR (1968), Statistical Theories of Mellial Test Scores, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. Louvier JJ, Hensher I)A & Swait JO (2000), Stated Choice Met.hods: Analysis ami ApplicatiollS, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Lynham SA (2002), Quantitative research and theory building: Dubin's method, Adr.mnces ill Developillg Hllman Resources, 4(3), 242-76. Mackinnon 01', lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG & Sheets V (2002), A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects, PsyclroJogicaJMethods, 7(1),83-104. Malhotra NK, Kim SS & Patil A (2006), Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research, Mnllngrlllmt Scumce, 52(12), 1865-83_ Marshall CM & Rossman GB (1999), Deugning Qllalitntive Research, 3,deu, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

636 Phuong philp nghh1ncuu khoa hoc trong kinh doanh McAdnrn R, Leonard 0, Henderson J & Hazlett 5-A (2008), A grounded theory research approach to building and testing TQM theory in operations management, Omega Tile lniernational loumal of Managemetlt Science, 36, 825-37. McClave JT & Benson PC (1990), Statistics for Business and Economics, 4'ned, Singapore: Dellen. McCullagh P & Neider JA (1989). Gelleralized Lillear Models 2nded. London: Chapman & Hall. Michell J (1999), Measurement ill Psychology: Critical History of a Methodological Concept, New York: Cambridge University Press. Miller I & Miller M (2004), ,01111 C, Freund's Mathematical Statistics with Applications, 7'ked, Upper Saddle River NJ, Prentice Hall. Mintzberg H (1979), An emerging strategy of 'direct' research. Admillistrative Science Quarterly, 24, 580-89, Montgomery DC (2005), Desig» and Aualysis of Experiments, 6\"'ed, Hoboken NJ: Wiley, Morgan DL (1996), pocus groups, I1l1l1ualRevielVofSociology, 22, 129-52, Muthen B & Kaplan D (1985), A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables, Britisu Journal of Mathematical mId Statistical Psye/lologtj, 38 May, 171-80. MRSA (1994), Qualitative Recruiters' Handbook, 2nded, North Sydney, NSW: Market Research Society of Australia Limited. Myers JL & Well AD (2003), Research Design alld Statistical Arralysis, 2nded, Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Narver JC & Slater SF (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. JouTllal of Marketirrg. 54 July, 20-35. Neale JM & Liebert RM (1973). Science and Behavior: Arr introduction to Methods of Research, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall. Nevid JS & Maria NLS (1999), Multicultural issues in qualitative research, Psychology If Marketillg, 16(4),305-25.

637 Newbold P (1991), Slalistics for Business and Economics, 3thed, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Nguy~n Dinh ThO (2007a), (fng dung phuong phap nghien ciru dinh tucng t\\li Trucng DH Kinh te TPHCM, Plui! lrie'n Kinll Ie; 17 thang 3, 17-20. Nguy~n Dinh Tho (2007b), Mot sO gQi Y de thuc hi~n nghien ciru cho lu~n an tien si nganh qulin tri kinh doanh, Pllallrien Killil Ie; 17, thang 6, 7- 10. Nguy~n Dinh ThO (2008), Nghiell crtlt cho luQII viill /Ot nghifp IIgallll QTKD; Thut: trqng vil gitil plrtip, TPHCM: NXB \\/lin hoa-Thanh nien. Nguy~n Dinh Tho & Nglly~n Th] Mai Trang (2008a), Mot so yeu to chinh ulc dong vso xu hU'ang tieu dung hilng nQi ella ngttoi Viet, trong Nglrii!n el(1Ikl,on JrC)cmarketing: (fllg rl!wg mil Itlllh call tnic tllyerl iinh SEM, NSl-ly~n Dinh ThQ & Nguy~n Thj Mai Trang (cb), TPHCM: NXe DH Quoe gia TPHCM, 161-242: caNguyen Dlnh Tho & Nguy~n Thj Mai Trang (200Bb), Canh tranh nhan Ievb X~I Imang tieu clung thuong hi~u quoe ella nguOi Vi~t Nam, trong Nglliell elhl klwlI h9C marketing: lrllg d!lI1g m6 It/nlr call tnic luylifl tlnh SEM, Nguy~n Dmh Tho & Nguy&n Thj Mai Trang (cb), TPHCM: NXB DU QlIClCgia TP1ICM, 243-99. Nguy~n Dinh ThO & NgllY~11Thj Mal Trang (2010), Nang luc canh tranh dong cua doanh nghi~p Vi~t Nam, trong Nghii!n dru kho« 119Cqlllill tri killil donllJr, Nglly~n Dlnh ThO & Ngt,y~n Thi Mai Trang (cb), TPHCM: NXB Thong ke, 153-243. Nglly~n Dlnh ThO, Nguy~n Th] Mai Trang & Tilln 111i Kim Dung (2010), Ly thuyet rin hi~u va gia rr] chuang trinh cao hoc quan rri kinh doanh, Irong NgJrieli Clnl kiron hoc qllrill IT! killJr dOG/tit, Nguy~n Dlnh Tho & Nguy~n Thj Mai Trang (cb), TPHG\\!{: NXB Thong ke, 245-309. Nguy~n Dinh ThO, Pharn Xuan Lan, \\lguy~n Thi Bich Cham & Nguy~n Thj Mai Trang (2010), Thu9c tinh dja phuong va sg hai long cua doanh nghi~p, rrong Nghi€Il CI(II khon h(lC qlltill trj killh doallh, Nguy~n Dinh Tho & Nguy@n Thi Mai Trang (cb), TPHCM: NXB Thong ke, 73-151.

638 Phuongphap nghienciru khanhoc trong kinh doanh Nguyen TO (2007), Factors affecting the utilization of the Internet by internationalizing firms in transition markets: Evidence from Vietnam, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 25(4),360-76, Nguyen TO (2009a), Place development: Attributes and business customer satisfaction in Tien Giang province, Vietnam, JOllrnal of Macrolllnrketing, 29(4),384-91. Nguyen TO (2009b), Signal quality and service quality: A study of local and international MBA programs in Vietnam, Quality Assllrallce ill Education, 17(4),364-76, Nguyen TO & Barrett NJ (2oo6a),Market and learning orientations and the adoption of the internet by firms in transitional markets, Asia Pacific lor/mal of Marketing alld Logistics, 18(1),29-42, Nguyen TO & Barret! NJ (2006b), The knowledge-creating role of the internet in international business: Evidence from Vietnam, [ournai of international Marketing, 14(2),116-47. Nguyen TO & Barrell NJ (2007),Internet-based knowledge internalization and firm internationalization: Evidence from Vietnam, Advances ill IlItCI'I1(1fiOlla/ Marketing, 17,369-94. Nguyen TO & Nguyen TTM (2011a), The WTO, marketing and innovativeness capabilities of Vietnamese firms, Mnnagemel1t Research Review, 34(6),712-26. Nguyen 1'0 & Nguyen TTM (2011b), Enhancing relationship value between manufacturers and distributors through personal interaction: Evidence from Vietnam, [oumal of Manogemellt Development, 30(4), 316-28, I\\!guyenTO & Nguyen TTM (2011c),An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand relationship quality in transition economies: Evidence from Vietnam, JOllmal a/Relationship Marketing, 10(1),43-56. Nguyen TD & Nguyen TTM (2011d), Firm-Specific marketing capital and job satisfaction of marketers: Evidence from Vietnam, TIle Learning Organization, 18(3),251-63. •

Ui li~u <15 d~\" 639 Nguyen TO & Nguyen TIM (2012),Psychological capital, quality of work life and quality of life of marketers: Evidence from Vietnam, iournot of Macromarkcting, 32(1),82·90. Nguyen TO, Barrett NJ & Fletcher R (2006), Information internalization and internationalization: Evidence from Vietnamese firms, international BIISillcss Review, 15(6),682·701. Nguyen to, Barrett NJ & Miller KE (2011), Brand loyalty in emerging markets, Mllrketil/g Illtelligencc & Planning, 29(3),222·232,Emerald. Nguyen TO, Nguyen TIM & Barrett NJ (2006),Consumer choices based on signals: The case of mobile phone services in Vietnam, Asia Pacific Advances ill COllsllmer Research, 7, 395·99. Nguyen TO, Nguyen TIM & Barrett NJ (2008),Consumer ethnocentrism, cultural sensitivity, and intention to purchase local products: Evidence from Vietnam, Joumal or COl/SImler Behaviour, 7(1),88·100. Nguyen TD, 5h\"lt7. Cj & Westbrook DM (2012),Psychological hardiness in learning and quality of COllegelife of business students: Evidence from Vietnam, JOl/malor Happiness Studies, 13(6), 1091-103. Nguyen TrM & Nguyen TO (2010a), Determinants of learning performance of business students in a transitional market, Qttality Assurance in Educa!ion, 18(4),304- I6. Nguyen TIM & Nguyen TO (2010b), Learning to build quality business relalionships in export markets: Evidence from Vietnamese exporters, Asia Pari/ic Business Review, 16(1&2),203·20. Nguyen TIM, Barrett NJ & Nguyen TO (2004), Cultural sensitivity, information exchange, and relationship quality: The case of Vietnamese exporters and their Asian vs European importers, jOllmal of Customer BeltaVlOllr,3(3), 281·303. Nguyen 'ITM, Barrett NJ & Nguyen TO (2007), The role of market and learning orientations in relationship quality: Evidence from Vietnamese exporters and their foreign importers, Advanccs in Intematlonnl Marketing, 17, 107·33.

640 Phuong phap nghiell cuu khoa hoc rrong kinh doanh Nguyen TIM, Nguyen TD & Barrett NJ (2007), Hedonic shopping motivations, supermarket attributes and shopper loyalty in transitlonal markets: Evidence from Vietnam, Asia Pacific Journal of Mnrkelillg and Logistics, 19(3), 227-39. Norusis MJ (1994), SPSS Professional Statislics 6.1, Chicago LI, SPSS Inc. Nunnally JC & Bernstein 11-1 (1994), Psychomelric Theorv, 3Rfed, New York: McGraw-I IiII. O'Conner GC, Rice M, Peters L & Veryzer RW (2003), Managing mterdisciplinary, longitudinal research teams: Extending grouded theory-building methodologies, Orgallizatioll Science, 14(4), 353-73. O'Leary Z (2004), The Essential Guide 10'Doillg Research, London: Sage. Orlich DC (2002), Designing Successfill Grallt Proposals, Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Osgood CE (1952), The natu re and measurement of meaning, Psychological (JIll/elirl, 49(3), 197·237. Osgood CE, Succi Gj & Tannenbaum PI] (1957), The Measuremelll of MCtlllillg, Urbana, III: University of Illinois Press. Overton RC (2001), Moderated multiple regression for interactions involving categorical variables: A statistical control for heterogeneous variance across two groups, Psychological Mel/lods, 6(3),218-33. Pallant J (2001), SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Dala Allalysis Using SPSS1'for Windows (Version 10), Chicago Il: Allen & Unwin. Patzer GL (1996), Experiment-Research Methodology in Marketing: Types and Applicalions, Westport 0: Quorum Books. Pedhazur EJ (1982), Multiple Regressun: 1/1 Behavioral Research: £xplallalion and Prediction, 2\"\"cd, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Perry C (1998), Precesses of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785· 802.

64.1 Ping RA (1995), A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables, /ofmml of Marketing Research, 32 August, 336-47. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie S6, Lee, J-Y &< Podsakoff NP (2003), Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, /Ollrnal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. Ramanathan R (2002), Introdflctory econometrics with Applications, 5\"'ed, Fort Worth PA: Harcourt College. Reichenbach H (1938), Experience and Prediction, Chicago 1Il: University of Chicago Press. Rosenthal R (1991), Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, Newbury Park CA: Sage. Rusenthal R &< DiMatteo MR (2001), Meta-analysis: Recent' developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews, Amlflal Reuicw oj PsycllOlogy, 52(J), 59-82, Ryan TP (2007), Modem Expel'imcffllli Design, Hoboken NJ: Wiley. Saris wn &< Callhoffer IN (2007), Dcsig«, Evaluation, and Auall/sis of QurstiulIIlllIrcsfor SlIruey Researclt, Hoboken NJ: Wiley. Saunders DR ('1956), Moderator variables In prediction, Educational and PsycilOlogical Measurement, 16,209-22. Scheaffer RL, Mendenhall W &< Ott L (1990), Elementary Suruey Sampling, 4lhed, Boston: f'WS-KenL Schriesheim CA, Eisenback RJ &< Hill KD (1991), The effect of negation and polar opposite item reversals on questionnaire reliability and validity: An experimental investigation, EduClltiolfal alld Psyclrological MeaslIremellt, 51, 67-78, Schostak J (2006), lllferuicwillg and Represelltatioll in Qllalitatitlf! Research, New York: Open University Press. Schuman H & Presser S (1981), Questions alld Answers ill Attitude SJlrueys, London: Academic Press.

642 PI'U'<lngphap nghien cuu khoa hoc trong kinh doanh Schwab DP (2005), HI'search Mrtllods fOT Organizationai Studies, 2\"\"ed, Mahwad NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Shah SK &: Corley KG (2006), Building better theory by bridging the qualitative quantitative divide, [ournnl of Mallagement Studies, 43(8), 1821-35. Sharma 5, Durand RM &: Cur-Arie 0 (1981), Indentification and analysis of moderator variables, !Dllmal of Marketing Research, 18 August, 291- 300. 5hekedi A (2005), Mllltiple Case Narrative: A Qllalitative Approach 10 Stlldyillg Mlliliple Populations, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Sirnsex Z &: Veiga JF (2000), The electronic survey technique: An integration and assessment, Organisnriona! Research Methods, 3( I), 92- 114. Singh J (1995), Measurement issues in cross-national research, [ourna! of lnternntionn! Business Studies, 26(3), 597-619. Slnkula JM, Baker WE &: Noordewicr TG (1997), A framework for market- based orgenizationnl learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. /OJIrlIflI of tue Academy of Mnrketing Science, 25(4), 305-18. Sirgy MJ, Efrety D, Siegel \" &: Lee D-L (200'l), A new measure of quality of work lifc (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories, Scciol lndtcator» Research, 55, 241-302. Spector PI! (2006), Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? OrglJlJiznliolJal Research Methods, 9(2), 221-32. Steenkarnp J-BEM &: van Trijp I (CM (1991), The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs, lnternational [ourno! of Research ill MarkelilJg, 8(4), 283-99. Stenner P &: Rogers R5 (2004), Q methodology and quaJquantology: The example of discriminating between emotions, trong Mixillg MetJrods ill Psyclrology: TIre Interaction of Qualitative and Quantitative Metlrods ill TIreory alld Practice, Todd Z, Nerlich B, McKeown S &: Clarke DO (eds), New York: Psychology Press, 99-118.

643 Stevens} (2002),Applied Mliltivaritate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 4'''ed, Mahwah N}: Lawrence Erlbaum. Stevens SS (1951), Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics, trong lIalldbook of Experimenta! Psycllology, Stenvens 55 (ed), New York: Wiley, 1-49. Storberg-walker J (2007), Understandmg the conceptual development phase of applied theory-buildmg research: A grounded approach, Hllmall Resource Developmellt Qllarterly, 18(1),63-90. Strauss A & Corbin J (1998), Basics of QI/Il/itative Research, TecJllliql/l'S and Procedure» for Developillg Groullded Tlwory, 2N1ed, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Street DJ & Burgess L (2007), COllstruetioll of Optimnl Sialed Choice Expericntents: Theory alld Methods, Hoboken NJ: Wiley. Sudrnan S (1976), Applied Samplillg, New York: Academic Press. Sutton RI & Staw 13M(1995), Whal Lheory is not, Administrative Science Qllarterly, 40 September, 371-84. Tabnchnick DC & ridell LS (2007), Using Mltltivllriale Statistics, 5\"'ed, Boston: Pearson Education. Tashakkuri A & Tcddlie C (1998), Mixed Methodology: ComiJillillg Qllalitative anti Qlllltltitatiue /vpprnachc», Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Tashakkori A & Teddlie C (2003,eds), Handbook of Mixed Met/rods ill Socia! & Behavioral Research, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. '1cddlie C & Tashakkori A (2003),Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioural science, trong, /-Iamlbook of Mixed Methods ill Social & Behauioral Research, Tashakkori A & Teddlie C (eds), Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Train KE (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Wallace WL (1969), Sociological Tlreory, Chicago [1]: Aldine.

644 Phuong phnp nghien cU'U khoa hoc trong kinh doanh Weick KE (1995), What theory is not, theorizing is, Administratiue Science Qllarterly, 40, 385-90. Wernerfelt B (1984), A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Mallagement/orlflral,5,171-80. Whctten DA (1989), What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4),490-95. Williams LJ, Cote JA & Buckley MR (1989), lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? /Ollrnal of Applied Psychology, 74, 462-68. Winer 5j, Brown DR & Michels KM (1991), Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 3r<1edN, ew York: McGraw-Hill. Wise SL, Peters LH & O'Connor EJ (1984), Identifying moderator variables using multiple regression: A reply to Barrow and Kahl, lourna! of MO//(/gelllenl, 10(2),227-36. Wiscmon F & Billington M (1984), Comments on a standard definition of response rate, lournn! of Marketing Research, 21 August, 336-38. Yin RK (1994), Case Siudy Research: Design and MetluJlis, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Zedeck S (I 971), Problems with the lise of \"moderator\" variables, PsycltOlogicnl Bulletin, 76(4),295-310. Zaltman G, Lemasters K & Heffring M (1982), Theon; Construction in Mnrketilrg: Some Tlrollglrts Oil Thinking, New York: Wiley. Zeller AR & Carmines EG (1980),Measllrement ill tire Social Science: The Link betweell Theory alld Data, New York: Cambridge University Press.

/, /

GIAOTRiNH PHU'<YNGPH..\\P NGHrEN ciru KHOA HOC TRONG KJNH DOANH T_ NGUYEN DINH THQ (Clllj bien) lIA X ATnA TAl CniNH Chill trach Ilhi~1I1Xlial ball NGUYEN v). TOc Chill trtich nhiem n(Jidllng NGUY~N f.)iN II THO S,;a ball ill NGUYEN TH! rrru I-IA Vi tlnh W} Ihidl Id bia NOlJY EN KfM Au Don vi lien kGl ; !'InA sACH TuAN MINI! Co sa 1 : 23 1)110DlIYTir, Phuong 5, Quan 10, TP.HCM DT : (08) 38.531.424 Co s02 : 237 f)i~n Bien Phll, Phuong 6, Quan 3, TP.HCM D1': (08) 38.229.019 In 1000 cubn khb 16 x 24cm. S6 dang ky k€ hoach XU\"'I ban: I6-2013/CXB1280-160ITC - Qf) s6 I85/Qf)-NXB1'C ngay419/2013. In 1~1Cong Iy ('6 Ph,1nIn Thuong M{li1)ongDuong. In xong va nQPhru chi~u quy 1OIim 2014.



• TiM DOC NKA SACK KINK TE TUAN MINII Gi6: 168,OOOd CO sci 1 : 23 .AO OUYTIl. F.5. Q.l0. TP.HCM DT: 08.3&.531.424 CO... 2: 237 Oltn Biln ...... F.6, Q,3. TP.HCM OT: 08.3&.229.019